Pundits have a lot to say about Boaz Arad's
death in the wake of a report detailing his sexual misconduct, and it's
almost all in defense of the real victims and the fourth estate
Days after artist, teacher and accused sex offender Boaz Arad
ended his life following a news report about his alleged misdeeds, there
is the appearance of hand-wringing in the press, though it all leads to
the same conclusion: The journalists who outed him did nothing wrong.
The Arad suicide makes the front page of all three major dailies
Sunday morning, and is accompanied by a goodly amount of commentary over
the “hard questions” that followed, in Israel Hayom’s language.
Yedioth Ahronoth leads off with the story, which
takes up almost the whole front page and the next three pages of the
tabloid. One might think that the prominence the paper gives to what
amounts to a very personal and domestic story is indicative of it seeing
a larger scandal within, but the paper makes clear it has no truck with
sympathy for the devil.
“Crime and punishment,” reads the headline of the paper’s main news
story, which is accompanied by self-portraits from Arad of him shooting
himself. The story notes that he was the third teacherin the Telma
Yellin school in Givatayim to be accused in just two weeks, but mostly
focuses on Arad and how the story on him led to his death. (Two
complementary stories from the paper delve into the allegations of a
wider harassment culture at the art school.)
As for the supposed hard questions, two of the papers’ commentators
come to the same conclusion: He’s not a victim and the journalists were
doing their job.
Artist Boaz Arad
“The media did its job and uncovered. Arad was the one who was quick
to pass judgment, to convict and sentence himself to death,” Ra’anan
Shaked writes.
At the same time, the paper’s Hen Arzi-Srour links the death to the #MeToo movement.
“The level of suicide and physical and emotional damage among the
victims of violence is unbearable. They, unlike those who hurt them,
have no power or standing. They are the ones who are taken advantage of
and always brought down. They cry in the dark, alone, out of sight. The
victims die in secret. They have no name or face or identity,”she
writes. “This isn’t shaming here since the article was well-founded,
truthful and to the point: a man who admitted to his deeds. The time has
come to say that in the age of #MeToo, the rules have changed. The
victim has a voice, and the voice will no longer be quiet.”
Haaretz relegates most of its coverage of the
suicide to its arts section, but the same general gist as in Yedioth
comes through, including columnist Roni Bar calling the death a tragedy,
but one that should not be on the head of Mako, the website that
published the allegations.
“Mako journalists did their jobs and gave a voice to victims of
sexual misconduct. From reading the investigation and without knowing
what went on behind the scenes, it seems they worked carefully, in a
well-founded and professional way. Once they became worried over Arad’s
mental state they even sent a police car to his house. It’s easy to
judge off the cuff, but they could not have known he would actually
follow through with his threats,” Bar writes.
But in the same paper, Doron Koren writes that the journalists were
out of line and too zealous in trying to join the #MeToo crowd, listing
as their sins the fact that the sexual misdeeds were 25 years old and
involved a consensual relationship, in his telling. “The media is still not built to differentiate the severity of
different sexual misdeeds,” he writes. “So maybe they will be more
careful next time.”
The Arad suicide makes the front page of all three major dailies Sunday morning, and is accompanied by a goodly amount of commentary over the “hard questions” that followed, in Israel Hayom’s language.
Yedioth Ahronoth leads off with the story, which takes up almost the whole front page and the next three pages of the tabloid. One might think that the prominence the paper gives to what amounts to a very personal and domestic story is indicative of it seeing a larger scandal within, but the paper makes clear it has no truck with sympathy for the devil.
“Crime and punishment,” reads the headline of the paper’s main news story, which is accompanied by self-portraits from Arad of him shooting himself. The story notes that he was the third teacher in the Telma Yellin school in Givatayim to be accused in just two weeks, but mostly focuses on Arad and how the story on him led to his death. (Two complementary stories from the paper delve into the allegations of a wider harassment culture at the art school.)
As for the supposed hard questions, two of the papers’ commentators come to the same conclusion: He’s not a victim and the journalists were doing their job.
At the same time, the paper’s Hen Arzi-Srour links the death to the #MeToo movement.
“The level of suicide and physical and emotional damage among the victims of violence is unbearable. They, unlike those who hurt them, have no power or standing. They are the ones who are taken advantage of and always brought down. They cry in the dark, alone, out of sight. The victims die in secret. They have no name or face or identity,” she writes. “This isn’t shaming here since the article was well-founded, truthful and to the point: a man who admitted to his deeds. The time has come to say that in the age of #MeToo, the rules have changed. The victim has a voice, and the voice will no longer be quiet.”
Haaretz relegates most of its coverage of the suicide to its arts section, but the same general gist as in Yedioth comes through, including columnist Roni Bar calling the death a tragedy, but one that should not be on the head of Mako, the website that published the allegations.
“Mako journalists did their jobs and gave a voice to victims of sexual misconduct. From reading the investigation and without knowing what went on behind the scenes, it seems they worked carefully, in a well-founded and professional way. Once they became worried over Arad’s mental state they even sent a police car to his house. It’s easy to judge off the cuff, but they could not have known he would actually follow through with his threats,” Bar writes.
But in the same paper, Doron Koren writes that the journalists were out of line and too zealous in trying to join the #MeToo crowd, listing as their sins the fact that the sexual misdeeds were 25 years old and involved a consensual relationship, in his telling.
“The media is still not built to differentiate the severity of different sexual misdeeds,” he writes. “So maybe they will be more careful next time.”
https://www.timesofisrael.com/expose-leads-to-suicide-but-media-wont-play-blame-game/?utm_source=The+Times+of+Israel+Daily+Edition&utm_campaign=049f02dd32-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_02_04&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_adb46cec92-049f02dd32-55186525