Da’as Torah and Anti-Vaxxers
In a recent article in the Forward,
Rabbi Avi Shafran, the spokesman for Agudath Israel of America, the
umbrella organization of American Charedi Jews, complained that the
media was singling out the ultra-Orthodox as the prime culprits
responsible for the measles outbreak in the United States. He implied
that what underlay these media reports was not only anti-Charedi
sentiment but actually unvarnished anti-Semitism. He pointed out that on
the one hand there are many “anti-vaxxers” who are not Jewish, much
less Charedim. On the other hand, what he called the “vast majority” of
Orthodox Jews do have their children vaccinated.
On its face, Shafran is not incorrect. The problem is that
he simply is not telling the whole truth.
Indeed, it is the very
leaders of his own organization who are telling their followers not to
vaccinate their children if, for whatever reason, they don’t want to.
Even more troubling, these same leaders are forbidding schools under
their religious aegis to deny attendance to unvaccinated children.
Although ground zero for the outbreaks in America have
been the Chasidic strongholds of Brooklyn’s Williamsburg and Borough
Park neighborhoods, it is the non-Chasidic leaders of Agudath Israel who
not only have justified opposition to vaccinations, but explicitly
condemn schools that require vaccines as a prerequisite for attendance.
They draw upon on mostly discredited studies and argue that the risk of
complications from measles is minimal. They overlook the fact that the
saving of life (pikuach nefesh) applies even in cases where the
risk of death is minimal. Yet the risk is very real. I should know. Many
years ago, my younger brother nearly died from complications of
measles. It was only thanks to the proximity of a talented and energetic
doctor that he survived the trip to the hospital.
The risk is very real. I should know. Many years ago, my younger brother nearly died from complications of measles.
And yet these rabbis assert their opinion is nothing less than what has come to be called da’as Torah,
or Torah authority, elevating their erroneous and dangerous views to
the level of near prophesy. No wonder ordinary Charedim are loathe to
challenge the views of their respected leaders. To do so would be to
risk expulsion from their tightly-knit communities.
Who are the men issuing these
pronouncements? Two of them lead the Beis Medrash Govoha of Lakewood,
N.J.: Rabbi Malkiel Kotler, its chancellor or Rosh HaYeshiva, and Rabbi
Matisyahu Solomon, its moral tutor (to borrow a term employed at
Oxbridge colleges) or mashgiach. They lead a yeshiva that is the most
prestigious and the wealthiest school of its kind in the United Stares —
in effect, the Harvard of yeshivas. No wonder their word is taken as
law.
But these men are not alone among the rabbinical
anti-vaxxers. Rabbis Shmuel Kamenetsky and Aaron Schechter are, like
Rabbi Kotler, members of the Moetzes Gedolei HaTorah — the Committee of
Torah Sages — that dictates Agudah’s religious and secular policies.
Rabbi Chaim Kanievsky, a leading Israel-based decisor for thousands of
Charedim worldwide, has also, in the words of Rabbis Kotler, Solomon and
Kaminetsky, “explicitly ruled that schools cannot refuse such
[unvaccinated] children.” These rulings are not merely flouting science;
their da’as Torah is endangering hundreds, perhaps thousands of younger
children and older people who are especially vulnerable to
complications from measles.
In the previous century, Agudah’s rabbis invoked da’as
Torah to urge Europe’s Orthodox Jews not to emigrate to America or
Israel in order to escape the Nazi onslaught. Until May 1948, they
invoked the same principle to oppose the creation of the State of
Israel. In the 1970s and ’80s, they invoked da’as Torah again to counsel
against public demonstrations on behalf of Soviet Jewry. Now they
invoke it to oppose vaccinations. And once again, as before, they find
themselves on the wrong side of history.
Dov S. Zakheim was Under Secretary of Defense
in the George W. Bush administration and Deputy Under Secretary of
Defense in the second Ronald Reagan administration. He holds a doctorate
from Oxford.
Lubavitch [aka Chabad] often claims that their most
ReplyDeleterecent leader, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson,
was a prophet [navi], in addition to being the messiah.
There are three reasons why this cannot be true:
[1] Our Rabbis teach that prophesy ended with Malachi.
[2] Only THE SANHEDRIN has the authority
to officially recognize who is a prophet [navi].
Since wo have no Sanhedrin in our times,
nobody can be officially recognizes as a prophet.
[3] Except for Moshe and Aharon, a prophet [navi]
must begin his prophetic career in the Land of Israel.
Since Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson was NEVER
in the Land of Israel, not even for one day,
not even for one hour, not even for one second,
he could never be a prophet.
For decades, he never left New York City.
Except for cemetary visits, he never even left Brooklyn!
CONCLUSION:
Therefore, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson
could not have been a prophet.
But don't expect Lubavitch to accept logical proofs
where their precious and beloved Rebbe is concerned.
I give you my most unconditional guarantee
and my most sacred oath that they will NEVER
listen to you; never, NEVER, *** NEVER ***,
forever and ever and ever and ever and ever!!
Not only will logical proofs fail to change
their beliefs, but logical proofs will
also cause them to hate you and attack you.
How dare you critize the Rebbe, who we
accept as being above all criticism!!!
===================================
If you want the truth about Israel
and the Middle East, then do not waste
your time with the FAKE NEWS
of The New York Times and the
Israel-bashing mainstream-news-media.
Instead, visit these web sites:
www.jns.org
www.algemeiner.com
www.memri.org
www.aish.com
www.camera.org
www.UKMediaWatch.org
www.HonestReporting.com
===================================
Who are the Palestinians?
www.algemeiner.com/2019/02/14/the-invention-of-palestinians/
https://shilohmusings.blogspot.com/2018/06/who-are-palestinians.html
Dov Zakheim happens to be correct in his main points here but beware as he is a lay leader in the Open Orthodox movement.
ReplyDeleteI am from those who chant Moetzes Resign! together with UOJ, but Dov is wrong on at least 2 points.
There was a chiyuv for everyone to oppose the State before it was formed - think the pre-Moshiach Shalosh Shavuos. But that doesn't mean we have to be antagonistic to it now after it was done improperly. Dov seems to be conflating regular frum Jews with Satmar.
Even the real gedolim said quiet pressure on the Soviets would in most cases be more effective than rowdy street protests alongside hotheads trying to put themselves on the map, such as Avi Weiss. Remember that the Reform shvantz Wise ignored pleas to not organize a rabble against Hitler in the early days. Time Magazine reported Hitler's reaction to learning of the Jewish protest against him at Madison Square Gardens. He ran around on all fours taking bites out of the carpet in a rage then rose to his feet to give the go ahead for the Final Solution. If not for the pompous Wise who knows how many more Jews would have survived if say the decree was postponed by 6 months?
There were visionaries like Rav Shraga Feivel Mendlowitz ZTL who understood that the State of Israel was a bracha from the RBSHO and did make a bracha with the Shem Havaya of Hatov V'hamaitev upon recognition of the State by the United Nations.
ReplyDeleteIs there a written teshuva with RSFM's reasoning on that? I am assuming he is going in the shitas haGr"a that what the freya did to be oyver on the Shavuah still results in a stage of bias Goel. But it doesn't mean we were allowed to facilitate it beyodayim beforehand.
ReplyDeleteFirst - a b'feirush ArtScroll :-)...and my father
ReplyDeletez"l and 3 uncles that were listening with him on a "borrowed" radio at the time of the UN announcement.
Nosson Slurpman & Slopowitz published something that controversial in Artscroll? And you wouldn't believe how much benign stuff they classify as "controversial" to censor entirely or edit. Plus the chickens would have a practical reason in this case because Satmar nuts have been known to harass anyone publishing anything like that.
ReplyDeleteRSFM was a pragmatist and a realist - the "aschalta d'geula" is different than the geula --- Yiden needed a safe haven --- Yes, him and R' Yoelish disagreed (almost) violently!
ReplyDelete