Hosting Illegal Yeshiva in his Basement – Response
A couple weeks back, Forward.com posted an op-ed by an Orthodox Jewish father explaining why he is risking a fine by hosting a yeshiva in his basement. The article can be found here: https://forward.com/scribe/457121/why-im-risking-a-15-000-fine-by-hosting-a-yeshiva-in-our-basement/. Comments responding to his post were, to put it mildly, negative and accusatory. I would like to suggest that we read his account a little more carefully and empathetically. It provides insight into the pressures and dynamics of the current circumstance in which so many parents find themselves. It is a very sad article, yet it is good to have it out in the open. I encourage you to read his article before you read my response.
* * *
It is extremely difficult to raise children, especially during hard times. The author (“Anonymous”) describes experiencing a significant parenting challenge. His response is to accept the offer of a workaround that frees him from having to confront this challenge and that absolves him from the parental responsibility to work at solving it. Unfortunately, that workaround is both illegal and dangerous. The school should never have offered him this option.
Rather than judge Anonymous and condemn him as a public health menace, it would be more constructive to analyze the situation that led to his dilemma and to unpack it, with empathy, since he certainly represents thousands of other parents experiencing a similar parenting challenge. His experience reveals some of the gaps and failures in our communal and educational systems – specifically in supporting and educating parents – that require attention and ought to be addressed.
School-Parent Expectations and Support
Anonymous is not the first person to discover that it is hard to motivate children to daven[1]. Parents and educators struggle with this challenge. It is the subject of countless parenting seminars, educator conferences, research articles in Jewish education journals, even doctoral dissertations.
In our Orthodox communities, parents are able to mostly offload this responsibility onto schools and camps. Some of these institutions are more successful than others at tefila[2] education. Parents are generally not confronted with our struggles with tefila education. But once schools closed for the pandemic, many parents like Anonymous had a rude awakening.
Anonymous tells us that during the months school was closed, his children “had nothing to drive them to get up” on time. His son “had been neglecting his prayers.” That is to say, Anonymous expected his 11-year-old son to be motivated and disciplined enough to perform the sort of davening at home – on time – that he was able to do (or that Anonymous imagined he was able to do) at yeshiva. When his child failed to meet these unrealistic expectations, Anonymous and his wife felt helpless and inadequate. He contrasts this with the “enormous sense of pride and accomplishment” he had felt back when his son was small and the expectation was “simply repeating a single sentence that he had heard every day since he was born.”
Where did Anonymous acquire these expectations? How much did the school educate the parents about home davening expectations for one’s children in general? Is it fair to ask teachers to provide realistic guidance and expectations to parents when they, themselves, elicit davening behavior through methods unavailable at home?
This father focused his article on his son, and on davening[3]; but parents have been struggling with various behavioral expectations, both religious and non-religious. What sort of support did schools provide parents during the months school was closed? Merely sending home star charts with lists of daily tasks for tracking children’s successes and failures, compliance and non-compliance, is not only woefully insufficient; in many families during the recent shut-downs, it became a source of stress and feelings of inadequacy, a brightly colored rebuke hanging on the refrigerator.
In what ways could the school – and other communal institutions – have tried to help Anonymous to feel proud and accomplished as a parent by providing the requisite skills and guidance? Is the yeshiva inadvertently conveying the message that a full and healthy Judaism isn’t possible for children if they are at home with their parents and not in school?
I ask these rhetorical questions not to criticize but to encourage schools to think about their chinuch[4] partnership with parents in a new way. But it is not only on schools. Our communities should be able provide the sort of parenting support and training that goes beyond hiring a speaker to give a 7-part lecture series. The experience of parents like Anonymous exposes one of the gaps in our communal support[5] for families, upon whom there are so many stresses, even without the extra stress imposed by Covid19.
“This seven-month layoff has been more than trying for my children,” Anonymous writes. Based on his article, it has certainly been at least as trying for him and his wife. Is it possible that the school in the basement exists for their benefit at least as much as for the benefit of their children?
Remote Learning: Schools and Parents Balancing Risks
Davening was not the only concern Anonymous expressed when contemplating another extended school closing. Anonymous is not the only parent in New York concerned that his children are falling behind educationally due to school closing or reliance on distance learning during this pandemic. I assure Anonymous that his children are not the only ones who experienced a pandemic-setback in mood, social skills, and self-regulation as well. These are indeed serious concerns.
I am not sure what effort his children’s school was making to address these concerns, however, because Anonymous declares that the school rabbis and principals “understand that remote-learning does not work.” As an educator, I find that statement very troubling, and not least because I have recently heard it elsewhere, bandied about as an axiom. Remote learning is not ideal as an all-day, long term approach. Most of us are not that great at it yet. But there are competent and creative ways to provide effective remote learning, and it is the responsibility of schools to find out about them and prepare themselves to deploy them should it be necessary. There are technologies that can be used without exposing children to the internet.
Besides, the choice isn’t either 100% remote learning done poorly or stuffing a teacher and 27 kids (above age 10 especially) into an enclosed basement without social distancing or souped-up ventilation. Masks are good, for sure; but even surgical masks are inadequate protection[6] for this set-up 6.5 hours a day at a time of community spread. Why did they not at least hold these classes in the back yard, which would reduce risk significantly and be legal, for as long as weather permitted? There are great personal microphones for teachers, usable with masks. Why no dividing kids into smaller “pods” to minimize risk?
Let us continue to read carefully, because Anonymous does not seem to have come up with this outrageous plan by himself. He is thankful to the school for “decid[ing] to set up classrooms in people’s homes,” and for refusing to accept the “edict” of the duly elected governor.
The school has given Anonymous more than a solution to his parenting challenges; they have also provided him a familiar Jewish narrative in which to embed and thus justify his action. We are resisting the evil edict of a Jew-hating tyrant in order to save our children and our religion! It is easy to slip this on and feel as virtuous as a Maccabi, especially if one is risking substantial financial loss. This school has unethically placed a michshol[7] before struggling, stressed-out parents. Will the Board of Directors cover the fine if it is levied? Insurance, legal fees? Can they absolve him and his wife of guilt feelings if ch”v someone sickens or worse as a result of this stunt? Are they even paying to clean Anonymous’ basement floor? Anonymous doesn’t say; but he is grateful to the school for putting him and his wife in this position.
Meanwhile, the school as an organization has seemingly been too inflexible to rise to the challenge or to productively adapt to changing circumstances. Why bother to train teachers in new instructional strategies that would make them successful in a situation that school districts across the country are also confronting? Why bother to work with communal organizations to provide parents with tools and support that would free them of some of their dependency and make them better partners in the chinuch of their children? Why bother with these when one can simply flout the law (turning otherwise law-abiding parents into calculating, garbage-shlepping scofflaws) and get away with doing exactly what one has always done?
I believe Anonymous truly has been convinced that he is doing what is best for his children’s “spiritual, mental, and physical health.” No longer is he helpless; now he is “moser nefesh[8]” for his children and his faith. He is proving to all that, in his words, “our teachings mean more to us than money.”
This mesiras nefesh, however, does not strengthen his family or make them more skillful parents. It does not push his kehillah[9] to do a better job of stopping the virus’ spread so that schools can open and stay open. It does not push them to address the stresses of today’s Orthodox families. It is an escape to a pretend world in which we can imagine ourselves heroic martyrs battling an old, familiar enemy. It is an indulgence in the fantasy that financial martyrdom is the sufficient and laudable response to whatever problems we face.
As a mechaneches[10] I feel obligated to remind us that there is actually a very real world with very real dangers and challenges, and the Torah places upon us the very real responsibility to face them without flinching and to identify new solutions in accordance with Torah values. The Neviim[11] were actually very explicit that merely sacrificing huge quantities of expensive property at the Bais Hamikdosh[12] is the easy way out; changing our ways, as individuals and as communities, is the hard work that the Creator values. To paraphrase them, we ought to be prioritizing the needs of the most vulnerable; conducting ourselves with utmost integrity; valuing justice over power; and having the courage to face adversity without turning to the nevi’ei sheker[13] telling us what we wish to hear. To save lives rather than to risk them. To take responsibility rather than to shift blame. To honor our elders rather than put them in danger. To conduct ourselves honorably rather than draw the ire of public officials upon ourselves. These are standards to which we should hold ourselves and one another.
Anonymous, by the way, is not the first father to commit an illegal and highly irresponsible action when an opportunity arises to do what he perceives to be in the best interest of his children. The school unethically used its perceived moral authority to convince him to ignore his conscience. His choice can be understood, but not justified, and certainly not emulated. This is all very, very not okay.
—
[1] Pray (Yiddish)
[2] Prayer
[3] This focus is itself worth exploring.
[4] Education
[5] Imagine if the model of chosson or kallah classes were adapted as parent classes for couples blessed with their first child. What an additional blessing if it became the norm for first time parents to learn from a non-judgmental teacher about basic principles like a child’s need for attachment, love, security, and structure, especially if that person were available over the years to coach and support them.
[6] Plexiglass does not replace social distancing and is ineffective against aerosolized droplets.
[7] Stumbling block
[8] Self-sacrifice
[9] Community
[10] Jewish educator
[11] Prophets
[12] Temple
[13] False prophets
Heck, I would try out a yeshiva, a bee it's in a basement!
ReplyDeleteThe Bechofers have the same krank as Gilligan Student with his "assur but necessary" garbage regarding outing child molesters. They straddle all sides of the fence, trying to be all things to everyone. Except they make zero sense. It's usually because they are tortured by a krum personal agenda they don't like to admit.
ReplyDeleteCompare this to when Yosef Gavriel Bechofer got bent out of shape when an old Rav Elyashev teshuva from 1965 was discovered that lowered the threshold on raglayim ledavar for molesters. Or how he was bellyaching for years he "can't make up" his mind, and is likely still stuck there, because he doesn't want to admit he likes Leftist feminist shitos that are gorem mamzerus.
And there's that Bechofer shvantz in Passaic, a miserable kaful shmoyna Yekke, who should keep his warped, arrogant opinions to himself.
Two more relatives of Shani Bechofer to round them out. One of them plays potential employers pretending to be seriously interested & then rudely ghosts them.
A branch of the Bechofer family own a women's clothing store in Monsey. County agents were trying to nail them for sneaking in customers during the pandemic's Spring peak.
Hey Shani, we didn't hear any tzedreite pshettlach from you about the clothing store? Cat got your tongue back then?
I don't bother with the paywalled NY Times but Ich hub gehert that the newspaper of wreckers' dean of Liberal shvantzes Thomas Friedman is advocating Democrats commit fraud by going to Georgia in droves to flip the Senate seats (& America as you know it) from the Republicans.
ReplyDeleteI found old announcements placed in newspapers & decree wall posters from the 1918 Spanish Flu pandemic.
ReplyDeleteGovernment officials ordered houses of worship closed for pikuach nefesh.
The Agudas Harabbonim who were all talmidei Volozhin, Slabodka, Kovner Kollel, Mir deLita, etc, did not make one peep of protest, nor did they start publicly hurling insults at powerful figures in golus, like the Agudah Baboons are doing 102 years later under Philly's spell.
As per R' Shmuel, you are not to listen to Chazal & Shulchan Aruch unless he gives the go ahead
ReplyDeleteOur Rabbis taught: When there is an epidemic in the town keep your feet inside your house. (Bava Kama 60b)
Our Rabbis taught: When there is an epidemic in the town, a person should not walk in the middle of the road, for the Angel of Death walks in the middle of the road… (did Tischler get the memo?)
Our Rabbis taught: When there is an epidemic in the town, a person should not enter the synagogue alone, because the Angel of Death deposits his tools there… (Bava Kama, ibid.)
In addition, it has been written that one should flee from a city in which there is an epidemic. You should leave the city as soon at the start of the outbreak, rather than at the end. All these issues are a matter of life and death. To save yourself you should stay far away. It is forbidden to rely on miraculous help or to endanger yourself… (Yoreh Deah 116:5)
Ner Israel henchman Avi Berkowitz is now heading the US delegation to Bahrain for 1st commercial flight to Israel!!!
ReplyDelete!الله خير لليهود! الله خير لليهود! الله خير لليهود!
!الله خير لشفتل! الله خير لشفتل! الله خير لشفتل!
There are misleading headlines including on Matzav.com, co-owned by Pinny Lipschutz & CEO Aaron Kotler, that SCOTUS refused to hear the case of Pennslyvania ballots.
ReplyDeleteThat's not what happened. Yesterday the highest court announced they are taking certain cases & certain cases not. They simply haven't decided on the Pennsylvania ballots yet.
“We Can’t Feed Everyone Every Day”
ReplyDeleteAmnesty International tells the Associated Press that authorities in Belgium abandoned 1000s of elderly people to die in nursing homes in the pandemic following an investigation into a series of inadequacies described as human rights violations.
One of the hardest-hit countries in Europe, Belgium has 531,000+ virus cases & 14,000+ deaths. During the 1st wave last spring, the country of 11.5 million recorded a majority of its COVID deaths in care homes.
Until Oct, Amnesty says a staggering 61.3% of all COVID deaths took place in care homes. The group said authorities didn’t implement measures to protect care home residents, hence failing to protect their human rights
Amnesty said one reason so many people died in homes is because residents infected by the deadly virus weren’t transferred to hospitals for treatment
“Our investigation allows us to affirm that care home residents were abandoned by authorities until this tragedy was publicly exposed” said Philippe Hensmans, director of Amnesty Belgium
Belgium was unprepared & faced with a critical shortage of PPE. As infections surged, care homes were quickly overwhelmed by the frenetic pace of contamination as municipal authorities even requested support of the Belgian Army to tackle the worrying situation
Belgium had one of the highest death rates worldwide during the 1st wave. But while nursing home staff were overwhelmed, hospitals weathered the crisis as its ICUs never reached capacity. Vincent Fredericq, the general secretary of care homes federation Femarbel, told Amnesty many residents in need of medical assistance were left behind
“Everyone was struck by the images of Italian & Spanish hospitals. These had great impact on our federal decision-makers, who said from the outset it's absolutely necessary to avoid overloading ICUs. Nursing homes were relegated to 2nd class & residents are the victims”
Amnesty based its investigation on testimony from care home residents, staff, NGOs, nursing home directors & families of the elderly
Doctors Without Borders said only 57% of seriously ill in care homes were transferred to hospitals due to “harmful interpretation of 'sorting' guidelines”
The prime minister’s office didn’t respond to request for comment from The AP
More than half of care providers quizzed in the investigation said they didn’t receive training to use PPE & weren’t informed about the virus. Amnesty said systematic testing of employees wasn’t introduced before Aug, even then with only 1 test a month
“Every time a care worker came in my room to help me wash, I was afraid. I wondered if COVID's coming in with her” nursing home resident Henriette told Amnesty
“It's very difficult for my husband to eat alone. As time went by, he lost weight” the resident's wife said. “When I asked staff about it, a care worker told me: ’We can’t feed everyone every day”
Former Lt-Gov Betsy McCaughey is mefarsem that the Agudah Fressers have appealed 2 of their court losses to Cuomo. She doesn't specify but probably means to the Federal Court of Appeals. I guessed that because in the same column she says that the Fressers' Vatican buddies have appealed against Cuomo directly to SCOTUS, one of Zweibel's pals with an oversize tzeilem.
ReplyDeleteThe money quote she's got from the Fressers is almost as comical as it is pathetic. The Fressers whine to the Court that Cuomo has made it "impossible to follow their own religion"
McCaughey thinks SCOTUS would have told all these idiots to take a hike a month ago, but now that the pandemic may chalila keep going like a seasonal flu even post vaccine, she thinks they might be willing to take the case.
President Trump today fired the director of the federal agency that vouched for the 2020 election
ReplyDeleteTrump fired Christopher Krebs, tweeting that his statement defending the security of the election is “highly inaccurate”
Terminating Krebs, a Trump appointee to director of the Cybersecurity + Infrastructure Security Agency, comes as Trump builds a case of Democrat vote fraud & is removing high-level officials seen as unloyal. He fired Defense Secretary Mark Esper on Nov 9, part of a broad shakeup to put Trump loyalists in senior Pentagon positions
Krebs, a former Microsoft executive, ran the agency, known as CISA, from inception in the wake of Russian interference in the 2016 election. He won bipartisan praise as CISA coordinated federal, state & local efforts to defend electoral systems from foreign or domestic sabotage
In recent days, Krebs repeatedly pushed back against evidence the 2020 election was tainted. Earlier Tues, he tweeted a report citing 59 biased experts claiming there's no credible evidence of fraud
Trump fired back on Twitter: “effective immediately, Chris Krebs is terminated as Director of Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency”
Krebs, from his personal Twitter responded: “Honored to serve. We did it right. Defend Today, Secure Tomrorow” He closed with the phrase “Protect 2020” the agency’s slogan
Officials with CISA & parent agency DHS, had no comment
Rep Adam Schiff, Democrat chair of the House intelligence committee & constant thorn in Trump's side, hailed Krebs & assailed Trump for “retaliating against Director Krebs & other officials doing their duty. Pathetic, but sadly predictable that protecting democratic processes is cause for firing”
Krebs has been directly repudiating Trump, a surprising move from a Trump employee, in an agency closely allied with Trump political goals. Krebs even had CISA issue statements disputing evidence of dead persons vote impersonations & other fraud despite Trump having evidence to those ends. Krebs even distributed a statement from a rabidly anti-Trump coalition of federal & state officials concluding there's "no evidence" votes were altered & that the vote was the "most secure in American history"
Krebs was having trouble keeping his own word when he had said - on the eve of the election - “it’s not our job to fact check the president”
CISA works with state & local officials as well as private companies that supply voting equipment to address threats while monitoring balloting-tabulation from a control room at its HQ near Washington. It also works with industry & utilities to protect the nation’s industrial base & power grid from threats
Amid reports Krebs feared he'd be fired, Rep Bennie Thompson, chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, was concerned & texted the director to ask if he's OK. The response was, “for now”
“It’s a shame someone with his talent is suddenly muzzled” Thompson said
Rep Jim Langevin, Rhode Island Democrat who focuses on cybersecurity, called to stand up for Krebs before he could be removed from his post
“Chris Krebs & CISA have done so well under his leadership because his team have done the job they were tasked with doing”
The agency has rocky beginnings. Just before Obama left office, he designated election systems as critical national security infrastructure, like power plants, as a result of interference by Russia, which included penetration of elections systems
Some state officials & Republicans, suspicious of Obama intrusion in their turf, were opposed to the designation. The National Association of Secretaries of State adopted a resolution opposing the move