There is no rational discussion. When a woman says she's pro-choice, she doesn't want to hear anything from someone who's pro-life. Subject closed. They're wrong. She's right. The latest thing on social media is a poster that says any man who gets a woman pregnant but doesn't want her to abort must commit to paying the expenses for that child. But when you point out that this means he will get a say in that child's life including where it will live (which means he gets a say in where the mother can live) the immediate response is "No, money doesn't give you any rights, just responsibilities". No rationality there.
The Court ONLY said --- pshuto k'mashmuo --- You have up to 15 weeks for non-Jews to abort the fetus - after 15 weeks (2nd trimester) the fetus is considered a person...Jews of course would follow the halacha ...
Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, No. 19-1392, 597 U.S. ___ (2022), is a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court held that the Constitution of the United States does not confer any right to abortion, and overruled both Roe v. Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992).
The case was about the constitutionality of a 2018 Mississippi state law that banned most abortion operations after the first 15 weeks of pregnancy where Jackson Women's Health Organization, Mississippi's only abortion clinic, had sued Thomas E. Dobbs, state health officer with the Mississippi State Department of Health in March 2018. Lower courts had prevented enforcement of the law with preliminary injunctions. The injunctions were based on the ruling in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, which had prevented states from banning abortion before fetal viability, generally within the first 24 weeks, on the basis that a woman's choice for abortion during that time is protected by rights of privacy under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
THANK YOU FOR POSTING THIS.
ReplyDeleteThere is no rational discussion. When a woman says she's pro-choice, she doesn't want to hear anything from someone who's pro-life. Subject closed. They're wrong. She's right.
ReplyDeleteThe latest thing on social media is a poster that says any man who gets a woman pregnant but doesn't want her to abort must commit to paying the expenses for that child. But when you point out that this means he will get a say in that child's life including where it will live (which means he gets a say in where the mother can live) the immediate response is "No, money doesn't give you any rights, just responsibilities". No rationality there.
The Court ONLY said --- pshuto k'mashmuo --- You have up to 15 weeks for non-Jews to abort the fetus - after 15 weeks (2nd trimester) the fetus is considered a person...Jews of course would follow the halacha ...
ReplyDeleteDobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, No. 19-1392, 597 U.S. ___ (2022), is a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court held that the Constitution of the United States does not confer any right to abortion, and overruled both Roe v. Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992).
The case was about the constitutionality of a 2018 Mississippi state law that banned most abortion operations after the first 15 weeks of pregnancy where Jackson Women's Health Organization, Mississippi's only abortion clinic, had sued Thomas E. Dobbs, state health officer with the Mississippi State Department of Health in March 2018. Lower courts had prevented enforcement of the law with preliminary injunctions. The injunctions were based on the ruling in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, which had prevented states from banning abortion before fetal viability, generally within the first 24 weeks, on the basis that a woman's choice for abortion during that time is protected by rights of privacy under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.