
It’s been five years, and more than 20 million deaths globally. The first official case was in December 2019. The World Health Organization designated Covid-19 a public health emergency at the end of January 2020, the U.S. government declared it a national emergency on March 13, and every single state ordered or recommended schools close at some point between March 16 and March 27. What followed was trauma: years of mass mortality, inescapable infection and deep disruption, even to the lives of the relatively safe.
Next week I’ll be publishing an essay reflecting on where that world-historical whirlwind eventually left us, focused less on the emergency itself than on all the ways, both obvious and subtle, an unthinkable — even unbelievable — mortality event transformed our world. But today I just want to remind us where things started, half a decade ago now.
My first hint came via Twitter on Dec. 31, 2019, when I saw the health and medicine journalist Helen Branswell warning of “unexplained pneumonias” in China. The plot beats that would follow were, in certain ways, familiar enough, Hollywood and science fiction having taught us all about global health emergencies and what might be done to stop them. But although I could easily imagine a pandemic unfolding onscreen, I couldn’t really believe we’d end up living through one, so deep were my intuitions that plagues were — at least in the wealthy world — a thing of the past. Whatever I’d heard from scientists about the risks of this or that future outbreak, I was living firmly in epidemiological denial.
Two months later, in the first days of March, I found myself having dinner with an old friend who told me that he and his father had recently made a casual bet about how many Americans would ultimately die of the disease. His father had bet the total would be under 100,000; my friend had guessed more. “What do you think?” he asked me. I grimaced a little. “I’d take the over at a million,” I said.
I was reminded of this all recently when reading about a similar bet that the writer and podcaster Sam Harris said he made with his former friend Elon Musk at the beginning of the pandemic. (It’s ugly but perhaps illuminating to realize how many responded to the scary news by gambling on it.) Musk’s intuition was that the whole thing would just go away. On March 19, 2020, he tweeted that “on current trends,” the country was headed to no new cases sometime by the end of April, and he bet Harris that the outbreak would produce fewer than 35,000 cases in total. When the official count of Covid deaths passed 35,000 in April, Harris wrote to Musk to ask, cheekily, whether this meant he’d won the bet. Musk did not respond. In fact, to read Harris’s retelling of it, that was the end of their friendship and the moment he watched his old comrade disappear into a kind of alternate reality.
Today, the official Covid death toll in the United States stands at 1.22 million. Excess mortality counts, which compare the total number of all-cause deaths to a projection of what they would have been without the pandemic, run a little higher — about 1.5 million.
In other words, the alarmists were closer to the truth than anyone else. That includes Anthony Fauci, who in March 2020 predicted 100,000 to 200,000 American deaths and was called hysterical for it. The same was true of the British scientist Neil Ferguson, whose Imperial College model suggested that the disease might ultimately infect more than 80 percent of Americans and kill 2.2 million of us. Thankfully, the country was vaccinated en masse long before 80 percent were infected, but as early as March 2020 Donald Trump and Deborah Birx (who helped run the White House’s Covid response) appeared to be referencing Ferguson’s figure to claim credit for avoiding more than two million deaths — a success they explicitly attributed to shelter-in-place guidelines, business closings and travel restrictions.
Five years later, though the world has been scarred by all that death and illness, it is considered hysterical to narrate the history of the pandemic by focusing on it. Covid minimizers and vaccine skeptics now run the country’s health agencies, but the backlash isn’t just on the right. Many states have tied the hands of public health authorities in dealing with future pandemic threats, and mask bans have been implemented in states as blue as New York. Everyone has a gripe with how the pandemic was handled, and many of them are legitimate. But our memories are so warped by denial, suppression and sublimation that Covid revisionism no longer even qualifies as news. When I come across an exchange like this one from last weekend, in which Woody Harrelson called Fauci evil on Joe Rogan’s show, or this one from last year, in which Rogan and Tony Hinchcliffe casually attribute a rise in excess and all-cause mortality to the aftereffects of vaccination, I don’t even really flinch.
To be clear, their suggestion is spurious. (Ironically, the vaccines are the reason we can even entertain such speculation.) In some countries where vaccination was more universal than here, such as the U.K., shots effectively brought an end to the pandemic emergency. And as I wrote two years ago, total mortality through the pandemic has tracked so closely with known Covid waves — spiking when cases were also spiking, subsiding when the disease was also in retreat — it was disingenuous to pretend the “unexplained” death was driven primarily by something other than the disease itself. American contrarians have often pointed to Sweden to suggest a lighter-touch alternative was possible, but even the architect of that policy, who owes his global stature to the story of Swedish exceptionalism, has spent the five-year anniversary emphasizing, among other lessons, how similar his country’s approach was to the rest of the world.
The pandemic response wasn’t perfect. But the pandemic itself was real, and punishing. Above all, it revealed our vulnerability — biological, social and political. And in the aftermath of the emergency, Americans have largely looked away, choosing to see the experience less in terms of death and illness than in terms of social hysteria and even public health overreach. For many, the main lesson was that in the world of humans, as in the world of microbes, it’s dog-eat-dog out there.
But the consequences and aftershocks were also more subtle and diffuse: it isn’t easy to live in isolation and in fear, often largely online and surrounded by exceptional illness and mortality, as we watched aspects of the world and our own lives we’d long taken for granted be withdrawn or torn apart. And it isn’t easy to get over all that, however eager we thought we were to “return to normal.” We lived through as many deaths as some of the worst-case scenarios predicted, and without an initial spasm of inspiring solidarity and miraculous biomedical intervention, it could have been worse.
But when we came out the other side — 1.5 million fewer of us — we were, as a country, exhausted, resentful, deluded and distrustful. A huge amount of the world in which we now reside was formed in that crucible. I will write more about that next week.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/26/opinion/covid-fifth-anniversary.html
Say what you will about Netanyahu (I personally have major league issues (plural) with him); he understood very early on the necessity of involving the military and intelligence establishments in dealing with it, and not leaving it all to the healthcare system.
ReplyDelete{I got all of the jabs; the second one (as with them all for me) was in my left arm, and the next 3 days I felt a pain in my right arm.}.
The problem was that the pandemic was politicized quite early on and that understandly created doubters.
ReplyDeleteIn Canada we had the spectable of having the chief Public Health physician admit that Taiwan had called early on to warn us but she refused to take the call because the government didn't want to offend China by accepting Taiwan's warning.
We had Trump claim it was a lab leak only to have Fauci et al jump all over him and shout that there was no chance it was, only to later learn that there was plenty of evidence for it and that Fauci himself helped fund that very lab, something he never mentioned. And then the minute Trump lost power, those same people suddenly admitted that it was likely a lab leak but China says it wasn't and we must believe them
Even after most people were vaccinated and the strains started become far less lethal, we were told to still act as if we weren't vaccinated and maintain all restrictions. Schools stayed closed by order of the unions even after everywhere else in the world reopened.
And if anyone questioned the "We must completely shut down everything and put everyone on government payments and wear masks even when alone" they were demonized as if they were religious heretics.
So while I got all my shots (and even snuck a couple extra into myself, shhhhhh!), I understand why people are now skeptical.
I trusted the Science, even though by definition it is imperfect. mRNA has been developing since the 1980s - some of my healthy acquaintances started dying, I got all the shots!
ReplyDeleteAll the noise was politics and insanity which had nothing to do with the efficacy of mRna.
ReplyDeletesci·ence
ReplyDelete/ˈsīəns/
noun
noun: science
1.
the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation, experimentation, and the testing of theories against the evidence obtained.
"the world of science and technology"
What is the original meaning of science?
ReplyDeleteknowledge
In English, science came from Old French, meaning knowledge, learning, application, and a corpus of human knowledge. It originally came from the Latin word scientia which meant knowledge, a knowing, expertness, or experience. By the late 14th century, science meant, in English, collective knowledge.
There's science and there's scientism
ReplyDeleteOne is objective, the other is subjective.
One looks at the data, the other takes the data it wants to prove a point.
And that's why the CoVID response was so faulty. The science wasn't the issue, it was the scientists willing to adjust their message to satisfy a political position and everyone seeing it.
I'll give you an example. If you actually followed the scientific literature, at no time did anyone say that a CoVID vaccine was amazing for preventing CoVID. It was good at reducing the risk of getting it and if you got it, it was good for reducing the severity of the illness. That was it but the press, quoting scientist, promised a miracle and when that didn't happen people spoke up about their doubts.
Not to name-throw --- I was in direct contact with Drs. Aron Glatt, Paul Offitt, Jonathan Reiner and Nachum Klafter.
ReplyDeleteSince I am no longer in Balto, I have just now found out about the sentencing of William Zev Steen, that you, UOJ, once wrote about: 23 years in prison – http://hareiani.com/tag/william-zev-steen/. The interesting info I did not know: rabbi Shraga Neuberger (Ner Israel) officially knew Steen was a pedophile since at least 2013 (!) and did nothing to stop him, rabbi Mordechai Shuchatowitz (also of Ner Israel), the leader of Baltimore rabbinical court, said Steen just had an "addiction" to porn, and the petition to free Steen received 364 signatures. What can be done about that, UOJ? How do we Make Jewish America Great Again?
ReplyDeleteAfter watching the way President Trump and VP JD Vance publicly berated Zelenskyy, a courageous leader trying to save his nation from the aggression of a much stronger country Russia run by a bully and thug like Putin, who clearly started the war, I must say I’m ashamed to be an American.
ReplyDelete