US said pushing Israel to transfer parts of West Bank to PA administrative rule
Economic incentives insufficient; Americans reportedly want Netanyahu to do more to revive peace talks; PMO denies TV report

A
 red sign on the side of a road warns Israeli citizens from entering the
 West Bank city of Nablus on July 29, 2015. 
The administration of US 
President Donald Trump is said to be pressing Israel to transfer parts 
of the West Bank to Palestinian administrative control as a goodwill 
gesture to help revive peace talks between the two sides.
Despite a series of economic incentives approved on Sunday
 by the Israeli cabinet, the US wants to see greater concessions to the 
Palestinian Authority and views the recent measures as insufficient, 
Channel 10 reported Wednesday. 
Specifically they have asked for areas in the 
northern West Bank to be transferred from Area C to Area B, according to
 the report.
Under the Oslo Accords, Area C of the West 
Bank (60%, where most of the settlements are located, and some 150,000 
Palestinians live) is under full Israeli administrative and military 
control, while in Area B (22%), administrative control is the 
responsibility of the PA while the IDF is in charge of security. Area A 
(18%, encompassing the major Palestinian cities) is under the full 
administrative and military control of the Palestinian Authority.
The Prime Minister’s Office later denied the Channel 10 report.
It was not immediately clear when the US supposedly made these demands, but US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson told reporters on Wednesday
 aboard Air Force One that Trump “pressured” both Netanyahu and PA 
President Mahmoud Abbas during his meeting with the two leaders this 
week to return to the negotiating table.
It was also not known what concessions the US 
sought from the Palestinians during Trump’s trip to help restart the 
peace process.
During his visit to Israel and the West Bank 
on Monday-Tuesday, Trump repeatedly emphasized his desire to help broker
 a peace agreement between Israelis and Palestinians, but offered little
 in how he would encourage the two sides to revive peace talks.
Trump has repeatedly said he was looking to 
broker the “ultimate deal” with Israelis and Palestinians and is 
convinced he could do so. Trump has tasked his son-in-law Jared Kushner,
 and former real estate lawyer Jason Greenblatt with charting a course 
forward. Still, White House officials had downplayed the prospects for a
 breakthrough on this trip, saying it was important to manage their 
ambitions as they wade into terrain that has tripped up more experienced
 diplomats.

US President Donald Trump delivers a speech at the Israel Museum in Jerusalem on May 23, 2017. (AFP Photo/Menahem Kahana)
In a speech Tuesday at the Israel Museum, the 
president heaped praise on Israel, while calling on both sides to make 
compromises toward peace. He urged them to put aside the “pain and 
disagreements of the past” and declared that both sides were ready to 
move forward.
The president notably avoided all of the 
thorny issues that have stymied peace efforts for decades. He did not 
mention Israeli settlements, the status of Jerusalem or even whether the
 US would continue to insist on a two-state solution giving the 
Palestinians sovereign territory.
In a meeting with opposition leader Isaac 
Herzog on Tuesday, Kushner said Washington intended to move fast to 
advance a renewal of peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians, a 
spokesman for Herzog said, with Trump’s envoy Jason Greenblatt 
reportedly set to return next week so as not to leave a “diplomatic 
vacuum.”
In a separate report Wednesday, Channel 10 
said that Israel’s National Security Council is currently considering a 
plan to transfer control of two East Jerusalem neighborhoods from the 
Jerusalem Municipality to a yet-to-be established local council.


1 comment:
Have no fear. The Arabs will never allow a peace deal of any meaning to go through.
Post a Comment