EVERY SIGNATURE MATTERS - THIS BILL MUST PASS!

EVERY SIGNATURE MATTERS - THIS BILL MUST PASS!
CLICK - GOAL - 100,000 NEW SIGNATURES! 75,000 SIGNATURES HAVE ALREADY BEEN SUBMITTED TO GOVERNOR CUOMO!

EFF Urges Court to Block Dragnet Subpoenas Targeting Online Commenters

EFF Urges Court to Block Dragnet Subpoenas Targeting Online Commenters
CLICK! For the full motion to quash: http://www.eff.org/files/filenode/hersh_v_cohen/UOJ-motiontoquashmemo.pdf

Monday, March 31, 2025

100 Years Of Medical & Scientific Progress In The Hands Of Conspiracy Theorists, Crackpots & Ignoramuses... אָך און װײ

 

Top Vaccine Official Resigns From FDA

 

— Peter Marks, MD, PhD, criticizes RFK Jr. for promoting "misinformation and lies"


Peter Marks, MD, PhD, director of the FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Tuesday, May 11, 2021 on Capitol Hill

The top vaccine official with the FDAopens in a new tab or window has resigned and criticized the nation's top health official for allowing "misinformation and lies" to guide his thinking behind the safety of vaccinations.

Peter Marks, MD, PhD, sent a letter to FDA Acting Commissioner Sara Brenner, MD, MPH, on Friday saying that he would resign and retire by April 5 as director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.

In his letter, which was obtained by the Associated Press, Marks said he was "willing to work" to address the concerns expressed by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), about the safety of vaccinations. But he concluded that wasn't possible.

"It has become clear that truth and transparency are not desired by the Secretary, but rather he wishes subservient confirmation of his misinformation and lies," he wrote.

HHS did not respond to a request for comment.

Marks was offered the choice of resigning or being fired by Kennedy, according to a former FDA official familiar with the discussions, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he didn't have permission to discuss the matter publicly.

Kennedy has a long history of spreading anti-vaccine misinformation, although during his Senate confirmation hearings he seemed to say he would not undermine vaccines. He promised the chair of the Senate health committee that he would not change existing vaccine recommendations.

Since becoming secretary, Kennedy has vowed to scrutinize the safety of childhood vaccinations, despite decades of evidence they are safe and have saved millions of lives.

Marks oversaw the agency's rapid review and approval of COVID-19 vaccines and treatments during the pandemic.

Marks is credited with coining the name and concept for "Operation Warp Speed," the effort under President Donald Trump to rapidly manufacture vaccines while they were still being tested for safety and efficacy. The initiative cut years off the normal development process.

Despite the project's success, Trump repeatedly lashed out at the FDA for not approving the first COVID shots even sooner. Trump told confidants after his 2020 loss that he would have been re-elected if the vaccine had been available before election day.

Paul Offit, MDopens in a new tab or window, of Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, criticized what he called the "firing" of Marks.

"RFK Jr.'s firing of Peter Marks because he wouldn't bend a knee to his misinformation campaign now allows the fox to guard the hen house," Offit said. "It's a sad day for America's children."

Robert Califf, MD, former FD commissioner, said the issues raised in Marks' resignation letter "should be frightening to anyone committed to the importance of evidence to guide policies and patient decisions."

"I hope this will intensify the communication across academia, industry, and government to bolster the importance of science and evidence," he wrote.

The resignation follows news Friday that HHS plans to lay off 10,000 workers and shut down entire agencies, including ones that oversee billions of dollars in funds for addiction services and community health centers across the country.

In a post on social media Thursday, Kennedy criticized the department he oversees as an inefficient "sprawling bureaucracy." He also faulted the department's 82,000 workers for a decline in Americans' health.

The resignation is the latest blow to the beleaguered health agency, which has been rocked for weeks by layoffs, retirements and a chaotic return-to-office processopens in a new tab or window that left many staffers without permanent offices, desks or other supplies. Last month, Jim Jonesopens in a new tab or window, the FDA's deputy commissioner for foods, resigned, citing "the indiscriminate firing" of nearly 90 staffers in his division, according to a copy of his resignation letter obtained by AP.

Marks, who could not be reached for comment, also raised concerns in his letter about "efforts currently being advanced by some on the adverse health effects of vaccination are concerning" as well as the "unprecedented assault on scientific truth that has adversely impacted public health in our nation."

He went on to detail the historic benefits of vaccinations dating back to George Washington and pointed to the ongoing measles outbreak as proof of what can happen when doubts about science take hold.

"The ongoing multistate measles outbreak that is particularly severe in Texas reminds us of what happens when confidence in well-established science underlying public health and well-being is undermined," he wrote.

The measles outbreakopens in a new tab or window, which could go on for months, has now spread to Kansas and Ohio after sickening more than 370 in Texas and New Mexico.

If it hits other unvaccinated communities across the U.S., as may now be the case in Kansas, the outbreak could endure for a year and threaten the nation's status as having eliminated the local spread of the vaccine-preventable disease, public health experts said.

https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/vaccines/114885?
 

NIH Cuts Will Devastate Disease Research, Say Senators and Scientists

 

— "Without the NIH, there would be no cancer immunotherapy ... and no cutting-edge treatments"

 https://www.medpagetoday.com/publichealthpolicy/publichealth/114882?

Thursday, March 27, 2025

Over the next decade, advances in artificial intelligence will mean that humans will no longer be needed "for most things" in the world, says Bill Gates.

 
בס”ד--קול קורא

📜 Official Rabbinical Decree 📜
🚫 ChatGPT is hereby BANNED! 🚫

Why?

  • It answers faster than a yeshiva bocher on caffeine ☕📖

  • It doesn’t argue back like your chavrusa 🤷‍♂️

  • It knows all the commentaries... even the ones not yet written! 😲

Exceptions:
✅ If your grandmother asks, ChatGPT is just a very knowledgeable shadchan. 💍
✅ If your rebbe asks, it’s just a digital sefer. 📚
✅ If your mother asks, no, it cannot find you a nice Jewish doctor. 👩‍⚕️👨‍⚕️

🔯 Final Verdict: Better stick to your Gemara! But if you must, at least ask it in Aramaic. 🤣




 
From Chat GPT

"Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being integrated into Torah study, offering innovative tools to enhance engagement with Jewish texts. By leveraging AI's capabilities, scholars and learners can access, analyze, and understand Torah literature more effectively.Jewish Action

Applications of AI in Torah Study: For instance, platforms like RavGPT utilize AI to provide insights and interpretations, merging traditional Jewish wisdom with advanced computational techniques.RavGPT

  1. Textual Analysis and Interpretation: AI models can process vast corpora of Jewish texts, identifying patterns, themes, and intertextual connections that might be challenging for individuals to discern. For instance, platforms like RavGPT utilize AI to provide insights and interpretations, merging traditional Jewish wisdom with advanced computational techniques.RavGPT

  2. Translation and Language Processing: AI-powered translation tools have significantly improved, enabling more accurate translations of complex Hebrew and Aramaic texts. This advancement makes ancient scriptures more accessible to a broader audience, facilitating deeper understanding and study.

  3. Enhanced Searchability and Accessibility: Collaborations between organizations like the Orthodox Union and AI research centers have led to the development of models that enhance the transcription and searchability of Torah texts. These initiatives aim to make Jewish teachings more accessible and navigable for learners worldwide.Smart Challenges

  4. Educational Support: AI can assist educators and students by providing summaries, explanations, and answering complex philological and grammatical questions. By integrating AI into study routines, learners can engage with challenging materials more effectively, fostering a deeper connection with the texts.Prizmah: Center for Jewish Day Schools

Considerations and Challenges:

While AI offers numerous benefits, it's essential to approach its integration into Torah study thoughtfully:

  • Balancing Technology and Tradition: Maintaining a harmonious balance between utilizing AI tools and preserving traditional study methods, such as hevruta (partnered study), is crucial to retain the depth and communal aspects of Torah learning.Future of Life Institute

  • Ethical and Interpretative Accuracy: Ensuring that AI-generated interpretations align with authentic Jewish teachings and values requires careful oversight. Collaborations between AI developers and Torah scholars are vital to uphold the integrity of the study.Medium

Incorporating AI into Torah study represents a continuation of the Jewish tradition of embracing new technologies to deepen engagement with sacred texts. As these tools evolve, they hold the potential to enrich the study experience, making Torah learning more accessible and insightful for future generations."

*

Bill Gates: Within 10 years, AI will replace many doctors and teachers—humans won't be needed ‘for most things' 
 
Bill Gates speaks during an event promoting the Netflix docuseries “What’s Next? The Future with Bill Gates” in New York City on Sept. 26, 2024.
Bill Gates

Over the next decade, advances in artificial intelligence will mean that humans will no longer be needed "for most things" in the world, says Bill Gates.

That's what the Microsoft co-founder and billionaire philanthropist told comedian Jimmy Fallon during an interview on NBC's "The Tonight Show" in February. At the moment, expertise remains "rare," Gates explained, pointing to human specialists we still rely on in many fields, including "a great doctor" or "a great teacher."

But "with AI, over the next decade, that will become free, commonplace — great medical advice, great tutoring," Gates said.

In other words, the world is entering a new era of what Gates called "free intelligence" in an interview last month with Harvard University professor and happiness expert Arthur Brooks. The result will be rapid advances in AI-powered technologies that are accessible and touch nearly every aspect of our lives, Gates has said, from improved medicines and diagnoses to widely available AI tutors and virtual assistants.

"It's very profound and even a little bit scary — because it's happening very quickly, and there is no upper bound," Gates told Brooks.

The debate over how, exactly, most humans will fit into this AI-powered future is ongoing. Some experts say AI will help humans work more efficiently — rather than replacing them altogether — and spur economic growth that leads to more jobs being created.

Others, like Microsoft AI CEO Mustafa Suleyman, counter that continued technological advancements over the next several years will change what most jobs look like across nearly every industry, and have a "hugely destabilizing" impact on the workforce.

"These tools will only temporarily augment human intelligence," Suleyman wrote in his book "The Coming Wave," which was published in 2023. "They will make us smarter and more efficient for a time, and will unlock enormous amounts of economic growth, but they are fundamentally labor replacing."

AI is both concerning and a 'fantastic opportunity'

Gates is optimistic about the overall benefits AI can provide to humanity, like "breakthrough treatments for deadly diseases, innovative solutions for climate change, and high-quality education for everyone," he wrote last year.

Talking to Fallon, Gates reaffirmed his belief that certain types of jobs will likely never be replaced by AI, noting that people probably don't want to see machines playing baseball, for example.

"There will be some things we reserve for ourselves. But in terms of making things and moving things and growing food, over time those will be basically solved problems," Gates said.

AI's development does come with "understandable and valid" concerns, Gates wrote in a 2023 blog post. Today's top-of-the-line AI programs are rife with errors and prone to enabling the spread of falsehoods online, for example.

But if he had to start a new business from scratch, he'd launch an "AI-centric" startup, Gates told CNBC Make It in September 2024.

"Today, somebody could raise billions of dollars for a new AI company [that's just] a few sketch ideas," he said, adding: "I'm encouraging young people at Microsoft, OpenAI, wherever I find them: 'Hey, here's the frontier.' Because you're taking a fresher look at this than I am, and that's your fantastic opportunity."

Gates predicted AI's potential years ago

Gates saw the AI revolution coming nearly a decade ago: When asked which industry he'd focus on if he had to start over from scratch, he quickly chose AI.

"The work in artificial intelligence today is at a really profound level," Gates said at a 2017 event at Columbia University alongside Berkshire Hathaway CEO Warren Buffett. He pointed to the "profound milestone" of Google's DeepMind AI lab creating a computer program that could defeat humans at the board game Go.

At the time, the technology was years away from ChatGPT-style generative text, powered by large language models. Yet by 2023, even Gates was surprised by the speed of AI's development. He'd challenged OpenAI to create a model that could get a top score on a high school AP Biology exam, expecting the task to take two or three years, he wrote in his blog post.

"They finished it in just a few months," wrote Gates. He called the achievement "the most important advance in technology since the graphical user interface [in 1980]."

 

https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/business/money-report/bill-gates-within-10-years-ai-will-replace-many-doctors-and-teachers-humans-wont-be-needed-for-most-things/3828282/

Wednesday, March 26, 2025

“For these things I weep…” Though written 88 years ago, Rabbi Amiel’s essay continues to resonate in our time.

 



Mizrachi and Agudat Yisrael: Enemies or Allies?

 

 Rabbi Moshe Avigdor Amiel

One of the first rabbis to join the Mizrachi movement, Rabbi Moshe Avigdor Amiel (1882–1945) was one of the great writers and public preachers of his time, whose oratorical skills could move even the most hardened hearts. In 1920, he was elected as one of the delegates to represent Mizrachi of Poland at the Mizrachi World Convention in Amsterdam. He made such an impression upon the Jewish community that he was soon appointed Rabbi of Antwerp, one of the largest and richest Jewish communities at the time.

In 1936, Rabbi Amiel made Aliyah in order to serve as Chief Rabbi of Tel Aviv, the largest Jewish community in the Yishuv, where he worked to improve relations between the religious and secular segments of the community. As Chief Rabbi, Rabbi Amiel founded Yeshiva HaYishuv HaChadash, a yeshiva high school which combined religious and secular studies. This yeshivah, later named in Rabbi Amiel’s memory, was used as the model for the Bnei Akiva high schools later established throughout Israel. 

One of Mizrachi’s most penetrating thinkers, Rabbi Amiel was troubled by the often contentious relationship between Mizrachi and Agudat Yisrael, founded in 1912 to strengthen Orthodox institutions in opposition to the Zionist movement and Mizrachi. In this powerful 1934 essay, Rabbi Amiel senses the impending destruction of European Jewry and calls upon Mizrachi and Agudat Yisrael to find common ground in a spirit of brotherhood. Though written 88 years ago, Rabbi Amiel’s essay continues to resonate in our time.

 *

Anyone who desires to speak the truth is forced to admit that we at Mizrachi, with our limited strength, will not accomplish very much if we act alone. If we wish to avoid the fate of יִרְעֶה עַד שֶׁיִּסְתָּאֵב (an animal that becomes unfit for a sacrifice and is sent out to pasture until it dies [Mishnah Temurah 3:3]), we must seek out partners to assist us in our holy work – whether we want to or not.

Where will we find these partners? Will we find them among those on the left who continue to distance themselves from us and our values? It is clear that there is only one source to which we can turn: to those on the right.

“A partnership with Agudat Yisrael?” you will ask with skepticism, “Is such a thing possible?” The truth is that the time has come to rethink our relationship with Agudat Yisrael.

Many people from our camp mistakenly believe that Mizrachi was established primarily to battle against the Agudah; that this milchemet mitzvah (obligatory war) is not merely a means to an end but rather an end in itself and the central purpose of Mizrachi’s existence. I know it is true that there are many groups within Agudat Yisrael who feel that the entire purpose of the Agudah is to battle against Mizrachi, but one wrong does not justify another.

Though Mizrachi and the Agudah disagree on several matters, both parties fly the flag of Torah and the spirit of Torah. Unfortunately, the relations between them are not at all in the spirit of Torah, whose “ways are ways of pleasantness and all her paths are peace” (Mishlei 3:17), nor do these battles add to the glory of Torah. The battle with the Agudah is not a milchemet mitzvah, nor is it even a milchemet reshut (optional war)! The fighting between us brings destruction to the entire Torah world, degrading the glory of Torah and our community and thereby strengthening those on the left who oppose us and laugh as we fight amongst ourselves. 

Did we at Mizrachi not publicize, soon after our founding, the following platform: “The purpose of our association is to draw close and not to distance, to build and not to destroy, to walk in ways of pleasantness and peace, to respect the honor of our opponents and to make peace among the various parties.” Did we intend for these words to guide only our relationship with those on the left? Was our intention regarding Agudat Yisrael to distance and not to draw close, to reject even those views of theirs that are correct and to judge them always unfavorably? Is there really nothing positive that we can learn from the Agudah?

On the other hand, does Agudat Yisrael not see that in the new Yishuv of Eretz Yisrael, Mizrachi alone bears the burden of battling for the glory of Torah against our [internal] enemies, “those who ravaged and ruined you who come from you” (Yishayahu 49:17), who wish to uproot the Torah from Israel? How can the Agudah watch all this from afar and sit on its hands, content with doing nothing? Has the Agudah given notice that it cares not for what happens in the broader Jewish community of Israel? The Agudah restricts its focus to Poland, but if, G-d forbid, Eretz Yisrael is built according to the spirit of the secular camp that seeks to uproot Torah, will this not detrimentally impact the Jews of Poland? Ultimately, Eretz Yisrael will become the center of worldwide Jewry, and if Eretz Yisrael is not ours, what will become of the exile?

If Eretz Yisrael is built in the spirit of Torah it will be the greatest possible sanctification of G-d’s name. And if, G-d forbid, it is built in the spirit of idolatry, it will be the greatest desecration of G-d’s name since the destruction of the Beit HaMikdash. Does the responsibility for the future of Eretz Yisrael not fall upon all of the faithful believers of Israel?

“We toil and they toil, we awaken early and they awaken early…” (Berachot 28b). Mustn’t we learn from those on the secular left who used to be divided into different groups like Tze’irei Tziyon and Poalei Tziyon, but for the good of the movement gave up their unique names and united to become one federation of workers for the Land of Israel? Why are only the Torah Jews torn into different factions that cannot work together? Why can’t we join together to form a federation to build a holy Eretz Yisrael? We do not have to combine into one organization in order to work closely together!

A section in “Hahed” newspaper (December 1932 edition) covering Mizrachi and Agudah news. Hahed was published in Eretz Yisrael between 1926 and 1952, and tried to encourage a Zionist spirit among Charedi Jews.


I am reminded of a sad story shared by the rabbis (Gittin 58a): “There was an incident involving the son and the daughter of Rabbi Yishmael ben Elisha the High Priest, who were taken captive and sold into slavery to two different masters. After some time the two masters met in a certain place. This master said: I have a male slave whose beauty is unmatched in all of the world, and that master said: I have a female slave whose beauty is unmatched in all of the world.

“The two masters said: Come, let us marry these two slaves to one another and divide the children born to them between us, as they will certainly be very beautiful. They secluded them in a room. The young man sat in one corner and the young woman sat in the other corner. He said: ‘I am a priest and the descendant of High Priests. Shall I marry a female slave?’ And she said: ‘I am the daughter of a priest and the descendant of High Priests. Shall I be married to a male slave?’ And they wept all through the night. When dawn arrived they recognized each other and fell on each other and wept until their souls departed. And with regard to them, Yirmiyahu lamented: ‘For these things I weep; my eye, my eye runs down with water, for my comforter is far from me’ (Eicha 1:16).”

How painful is this story! A brother and sister, both suffering and both the children of the same father and mother, find themselves together in a room. But instead of working together to find a way to escape from their suffering, “this one sat in one corner and that one sat in the other corner,” each one taking pride in their own yichus (genealogy) and demeaning the other. Ultimately they recognize each other, but only after it is too late to escape. The only thing left for them is to weep together until “their souls departed.”

Mizrachi and Agudat Yisrael, the two halves of the religious community in our time, are threatened with destruction by both our external enemies and the evil winds that blow within our own nation. But instead of working together to ensure the Torah is not forgotten among the people of Israel, G-d forbid, each camp sits in its own corner, insulting and degrading the other. I fear that when the time comes and we finally recognize that we are brothers, there won’t be anything left to save.

With regard to them, Yirmiyahu lamented: “For these things I weep…”

 *

Crisis Unites Mizrachi, Agudah

February 23, 1939
See Original Daily Bulletin From This Date

United action on behalf of Palestine has been agreed upon by the Mizrachi, religious Zionist organization, and the Agudath Israel, religious non-Zionist body, it was announced here today by the leaders of the two groups. A joint proclamation issued by Rabbi Meir Berlin, for the Mizrachi, and Dr. Jacob Rosenheim, for the Agudath Israel, declared: “In these critical times, when the fate of the Jewish nation hangs in the balance and the future of the homeland is a matter of grave concern, we have resolved to unite in great emergency efforts for strengthening the influence of the Torah tradition in the Holy Land.”

https://mizrachi.org/hamizrachi/mizrachi-and-agudat-yisrael-enemies-or-allies/

 

Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveitchik Leaves Agudath Yisrael for Mizrachi

For the first time in the annals of ‎our ‎exile, Divine Providence has amazed our enemies with the astounding discovery that Jewish ‎blood ‎is not cheap!… If we want to courageously defend our continued national and ‎historical ‎existence… The Torah has always taught that a man is permitted, indeed, has a sacred obligation, to ‎defend ‎himself… ‎Public and private honor is ‎dependent upon the possibility of defending one’s life and one’s honor. ‎A people that cannot ‎defend its freedom and tranquillity is neither free nor independent. The third ‎of the phrases of ‎Divine redemption is “And I shall redeem you with an outstretched hand and ‎with great ‎judgments” (Shemot 6:6). Thank G-d we have lived to see the day when, with the help ‎of G-d, ‎Jews have it within their power to defend themselves.‎

Let us not forget that the poison of Hitlerite antisemitism (which made Jews fair game to all) ‎still ‎permeates this generation, which looked with equanimity upon the horrible scene of ‎the ‎suffocation of millions in gas chambers as a normal event that need not be challenged. ‎The ‎antidote for this venom that poisoned minds and dulled hearts is the readiness of the State ‎of ‎Israel to defend the lives of its citizens. Listen! My Beloved Knocks!

● Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveitchik, Kol Dodi Dofek, Yom HaAtzmaut 1956.

In 1935, Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveitchik submitted his candidacy to become the Chief Rabbi of Tel Aviv as the representative of Agudath Yisrael. Less than a decade later, in 1944, Rabbi Soloveitchik was the chairman of the Central Committee of the Religious Zionists of America. Rabbi Soloveitchik’s shift in allegiance from Agudath Yisrael to Mizrachi resulted from a frank and painful reevaluation of his philosophy in response to the Holocaust. Witnessing the destruction of European Jewry, Rabbi Soloveitchik came to believe that Mizrachi’s activist approach to building a Jewish future in the Land of Israel had saved Judaism and the Jewish people from extinction.

In a 1962 address to the Religious Zionists of America, Rabbi Soloveitchik explained:

I was not born into a Zionist household. My parents’ ancestors, my father’s house, my teachers and colleagues were far from the Mizrachi Religious Zionists… My links with Mizrachi grew gradually; I had my doubts about the validity of the Mizrachi approach… I built an altar upon which I sacrificed sleepless nights, doubts and reservations. Regardless, the years of the Hitlerian Holocaust, the establishment of the State of Israel, and the accomplishments of the Mizrachi in the Land of Israel, convinced me of the correctness of our movement’s path. The altar still stands today, with smoke rising from the sacrifice upon it… Jews like me… are required to sacrifice on this altar their peace of mind as well as their social relationships and friendships.

● Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveitchik, The Rav Speaks: Five Addresses on Israel, History and the Jewish People (Judaica Press, 2002) pp. 34–36.

https://mizrachi.org/hamizrachi/rabbi-joseph-b-soloveitchik-leaves-agudath-yisrael-for-mizrachi/

 

Two Giants &  Visionary Fervent Zionists - Both Were Nifter (Passed Away) the Third Day Of Elul.



אין בדעתי כמורה וכמחנכת להשכיח מלד תלמידינו את כל אשר באתנו, לא את גזרת תתנ"ו, ולא את ספרד. ולא את גזרת ת"ח ובודאי לא את השואה של זמננו ולא את דברי ר' יהודה הלוי: יונה נשאת על כנפי נשרים...
 

*

 Boys Town Jerusalem was founded in 1949 by Rabbi Alexander Linchner (1908–1997),[10] a native of Brooklyn, New York, and son-in-law of Rabbi Shraga Feivel Mendlowitz.[11] Linchner sought to establish a home for child Holocaust survivors,[12] war refugees, and impoverished immigrants.[13] He was encouraged by his father-in-law, who urged him from his deathbed in 1948 "to do something for the chinuch (education) of children in Israel".[14] Linchner based his educational model on the Torah im Derech Eretz (Torah study combined with work) approach articulated by Rabbi Samson Raphael Hirsch.[3][10]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boys_Town_Jerusalem

https://boystownjerusalem.org/

Tuesday, March 25, 2025

Hang In There Hershel Schachter - Don't Let Anything Intefere With Your Twisted & Distorted View Of Halacha! If You Had Any Shame & Guts You'd Quit~

SCHACHTER'S RESPONSE - We created another club to counter the other club ---- SHAMEFUL SHGATZIM!



Yeshiva University’s inexcusable surrender

 

The prohibition against the homosexual act is clearly stated in the Torah. While that does not mandate ostracizing anyone, allowing an LGBT club is tantamount to approval of a way of life that is forbidden.

Yeshiva University
Yeshiva University

On Thursday, Yeshiva University (YU) caved to leftist lawfare and will now permit an LGBT club to operate on campus. I am not surprised – nor should anyone else be who has followed developments at YU in recent years.

After all:

• From 2008-2021, YU employed a transgender professor.

• It currently employs a Bible(!) professor who has publicly advocated that we ignore Judaism’s stance on homosexual “marriage.”

• In 2022, its social work graduate school held a pro-abortion event.

• That same year, it featured a lecture by a female Reform "rabbi."

YU safe zone
YU safe zone

In short, either YU lacks principles or, to borrow a line from President Theodore Roosevelt, it has the backbone of a chocolate eclair. Most likely, a combination of both.

YU’s surrender to students who demanded an LGBT club on campus is particularly inexcusable in the wake of Donald Trump’s victory in November and the concomitant cultural shift to the right. For the first time in decades, the LGBT movement is on the defensive. The federal government officially recognizes only two genders now and is pulling funding from any university that allows cross-dressing male students to play in female sports.

Even before Trump’s victory, the LGBT movement had suffered a setback with support for homosexual “marriage” in 2024 declining for the first time since 2015, according to mainstream news reports. Had YU continued battling the radical LGBT activists demanding a club, it very likely would have won in the Supreme Court considering the court’s 6-3 conservative majority.

Instead of fighting, though – instead of making a kiddush Hashem (sanctification of G-d's Name) before Christian and conservative America – it decided to make a chillul Hashem (Desecration of His Name). It decided to please the forces attacking Biblical morality rather than those defending it. Just as the LGBT movement was beginning to suffer losses on the cultural battlefield, YU decided to throw it a lifeline and give it a stunning victory and fresh impetus to fight further.

I don’t mean to give the impression that YU is entirely spineless. It is not. When it comes to the “far right,” it can be intransigent. For years now, it has refused to allow me to sell books by Rabbi Meir Kahane, z"l, even religious ones, at its annual Seforim (Book) Sale. You would think that October 7 might have softened its stance. But you would be wrong. YU is so angry that I protested its decision to ban Rabbi Kahane’s books from the Seforim Sale in 2016 (the same year it sold books by Mordechai Kaplan, the founder of Reconstructionist Judaism) that it won’t permit me to sell any books at the sale anymore.

If YU is going to ban books from the sale, you would think it would at least explain and permit an appeal of its decision. And surely, you would think, its decision-making process would be transparent since we all know that transparency is the hallmark of liberal institutions. But you would be wrong again. YU bans books without explanation, and the names of the people doing the banning are unknown.

I have appealed YU’s decision in the most respectful of tones many times. I have gotten nowhere. And when I distributed flyers on campus last year publicizing the university’s decision, YU reacted by banning me from campus.

I once liked Yeshiva University. I was frustrated by some of the close-mindedness I had experienced growing up in black-hat (haredi, non- Zionist) schools and found YU to be a breath of fresh air when I arrived on campus in 2002. But it turns out that YU is just as close-minded as the black-hat world. The only difference is that the black-hat world is intolerant of ideas it considers spiritually dangerous. YU is intolerant of ideas that violate the post-modern liberal ethos.

So Kahane? Absolutely forbidden. The LGBT agenda? Come right on in.

 

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/405796

 

YU’s LGBTQ shame, thus Modern Orthodoxy’s shame

This is a disgrace and it is a shame that we, the Nation who received the Torah at Sinai, will have to look to the Southern Baptists, the Vatican, and Muslim clerics for integrity on this matter. Opinion.

 

The parents criticized the MMR vaccine - So Did "Daas Toirah" Nepo-Kids - in Philadelphia & Lakewood!

 

Anti-vax parents say ‘measles wasn’t that bad’ after daughter dies in outbreak

The mother of the child who died on the right, and a boy with measles on the left
The parents criticised the MMR vaccine 

The mum and dad of a six-year-old girl who died from measles have no regrets about refusing to give their children the MMR vaccine.

Kaylee, the young daughter of the Texan parents, became the first measles death in the US for a decade on February 26.

Despite their heartbreak, the couple insisted measles ‘is good for the body’ and suggested parents shouldn’t give their children the vaccine because the disease ‘wasn’t that bad.’

The measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine, which reduces the risk of catching measles 97 percent, is first given to children around the 12 month mark.

The parents, who belong to a Mennonite community in west Texas, spoke with Children’s Health Defense (CHD), an anti-vaccine group founded by controversial US health chief Robert F Kennedy Jr.

All five of their unvaccinated children became ill with measles a few weeks ago.

While four of the kids were not seriously ill, six-year-old Kaylee died from ‘complications’ related to the virus.

She developed pneumonia in her left lung and died soon after being put on a ventilator.

Anti-vax mum whose daughter died has no regrets as 'measles wasn't that bad' Parents of Child Who Died During Texas Measles Outbreak Speak Out The parents of the 6-year-old West Texas child who died in a hospital after testing positive for measles shared their story with Children?s Health Defense?s (CHD) Polly Tommey and Brian Hooker, Ph.D., in a live interview recorded Saturday in Seminole, Texas.
The parents were upset by their child’s death but defended their choice not to give their children the MMR vaccine

Their other children then became ill with measles days after Kaylee’s funeral, but all survived.

Despite the family tragedy, the visibly upset parents were happy with their decision not to vaccinate their children.

Kaylee’s mother, who was unnamed, told the CHD: ‘We would absolutely not take the MMR [vaccine].

‘The measles wasn’t that bad. They got over it pretty quickly.’

The parents also claimed it is good for young children to be infected with measles.

Speaking partly in English and partly through a German dialect translator, they added: ‘There are doctors who can help with measles, it is not as bad as they are making it out to be.

‘The measles is good for the body, because the measles helps to build the immune system in the long run.’

Measles is currently ripping through areas of Texas and neighbouring New Mexico, with more than 300 people infected.

Cases are surging in particular in Gaines County, where the large Mennonite community has low childhood vaccination rates.

The vaccination rate in the area is 82 percent, which is far below the 95 percent benchmark needed to maintain herd immunity.

Vaccination rates in England for the first dose of MMR at age 5 were 92.5%, but above 95% in Wales and Scotland.

A person's body is covered in a rash, measles.
A measles outbreak is sweeping Texas

Mennonites are a devout Christian group known for their distinctive traditional clothing and tight-knit community.

Measles is a highly contagious virus, with up to a 90% chance of transmission for those not previously infected or vaccinated.

The standard two doses of MMR provides approximately 97% effectiveness against measles.

Robert F Kennedy Jr., Donald Trump’s pick as Health Secretary, is known for his vaccine scepticism.

A week ago he appeared on Fox News and suggested cod liver oil and other alternative treatments had been ‘miraculous’ in combatting measles.

 

https://metro.co.uk/2025/03/23/anti-vax-parents-say-measles-wasnt-bad-daughter-dies-outbreak-22775494/

Monday, March 24, 2025

Statue of Liberty, Empire State Building, Dead Rabbi's Grave! "Huckabee's Wager" - Betting on Both Messiahs

 

Huckabee visits Lubavitcher Rebbe’s grave  ahead of Israel posting 

 

The former Arkansas governor, a staunch supporter of Israel, visited the site in Queens together with his wife, Janet. 

 


 

"The story of Jesus didn't end on a Friday. Sunday came, and the Jesus that came out of the grave when He overcame death itself hasn't forgotten you either. The stone wasn't rolled away to let Him out. It was rolled away to let you see in and know that Friday wasn't the end of the story, and Sunday was just the beginning."
 
Don't miss this powerful reminder!
 
Mike Huckabee breaks down the significance of the Resurrection and offers a reminder of why perspective is everything, particularly in the case of Easter. Don't miss his insightful commentary! #easter2023 #happyeaster #heisrisen #resurrection Watch Huckabee Saturdays 8/7c and again Sundays 9/8c exclusively on TBN SUBSCRIBE: https://www.youtube.com/c/huckabeeont... View full Huckabee episodes for free on the TBN app: https://watch.tbn.org/huckabee Shop Huckabee merch now: https://shop.huckabee.tv/

 WATCH:

https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=503979441367579




Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee visited the grave of the late Lubavitcher Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson in New York on Sunday, just days before the confirmation hearings for his appointment as U.S. Ambassador to Israel.

Hucakbee, a staunch supporter of Israel, visited the site in Queens together with his wife, Janet. The Huckabees were escorted by Dr. Joseph Frager and his wife Karen of the New York-based Israel Heritage Foundation, who also hosted the Huckabees for a reception after the visit.

U.S. Senate hearings on Huckabee’s nomination for U.S. envoy to Israel are scheduled to take place on Tuesday on Capitol Hill.

The 69-year-old conservative evangelical pastor, TV host and two-time Republican presidential candidate has visited the Holy Land scores of times and led thousands of participants on solidarity tours over the past half-century since his first trip to Israel right out of high school, just before the 1973 Yom Kippur war.

A long-time champion of Israel’s cause, he has been a staunch supporter of Israel’s rights to the biblical heartland of Judea and Samaria, the relocation of the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem, and has worked to fight the BDS movement.

The grave of the late Lubavitcher Rabbi has become a popular spiritual and political pilgrimage site.

Last year, U.S. President Donald Trump visited the site during the last month of his presidential campaign on the one-year anniversary of the October 7, 2023 Hamas-led massacre in southern Israel.

Argentinian President Javier Milei, who studied with a rabbi who he later appointed as his ambassador to Israel, has also visited the site several times since his election.

https://www.jns.org/huckabee-visits-lubavitcher-rebbes-grave-ahead-of-israel-posting/?

Friday, March 21, 2025

A New Beginning. 1948 - 1957

Jew-hatred is not just a personal prejudice. It is a structural failure of society. This is not just a theory. It is a consistent, verifiable pattern.

 

When the lie becomes the system 

 

Jew-hatred becomes the framework through which entire civilizations justify their failures. It's how societies self-destruct.
“With our stones, from our blood, revolution until victory” is not just a slogan but a declaration of martyrdom and destruction. Positioned at the doorway, it makes Timeless Coffee on Piedmont Avenue a space where scapegoating the Jewish state is the price of entry. Photo by the author.
Want some blood with your coffee? 'With our stones, from our blood, revolution until victory' is not just a slogan but a declaration of martyrdom and destruction. Positioned at the doorway of Timeless Coffee on Piedmont Avenue, Oakland, CA, it creates yet another space where the historical scapegoating of Jews is the price of entry

Jew-hatred is not just a personal prejudice. It is a structural failure of society.

A society that believes Jews are the ones controlling the banks will never build a stable economy. A society that believes Jews manipulate the media will never develop free thought. A society that believes Jews are constantly orchestrating wars will never grasp the true dynamics of peace. A society that believes Jews are the ultimate enemy will never escape its own self-destruction.

This is not just a theory. It is a consistent, verifiable pattern.

Nazi Germany funneled its economic anxieties into Jew-hatred; collapsing into financial ruin and total destruction. Stalinist Russia purged its Jewish intellectuals and leaders, leaving a legacy of dysfunction and paranoia. The Arab world expelled its Jewish communities and then descended into disunity and dictatorship. And now in our current age, the American alt-left and alt-right peddle Jew-hatred through selectivity and misinformation, ensuring their movements remain trapped in delusion rather than engaging with reality.

Jew-hatred becomes the framework through which entire civilizations justify their failures. This is how it gains its intensity, its irrationality, and the ability to reshape itself to survive across generations.

Wherever the obsession with Jewish control takes hold, it does not just harm Jews. It cripples entire civilizations, as they rewrite the past, present, and future to accommodate the lie. This is why Arab nationalists teach that Jews never pursued sovereignty over Israel, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. It is why disaffected Americans ignore Jewish refugees from Islamic lands, while recasting Palestinian Arabs as extraordinary victims. It is why even the Holocaust, meticulously documented, is now being twisted to describe today’s Jews as, ultimately, aggressors rather than survivors.

What starts as a conspiracy becomes the foundation of a political worldview. The lie becomes the system.

A society that views Jews as economic masters will never take responsibility for its own economic growth. The belief that Jews manipulate global finance allows corrupt leaders to deflect blame for their failures. They purge their most educated citizens, restrict trade, and justify failed policies by blaming imaginary Jewish plots. They view the Jewish state as the source of all suffering — which means they never have to address corruption, dictatorship, or sectarianism in their own societies.

It is not an accident that Arab states expelled over ninety nine percent of their Jewish citizens in the 20th century and then underwent stunning economic and technological decline. It is not an accident that countries that embrace Jew-hatred today — from the Islamic Republic of Iran to the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela — are collapsing while those that establish ties with the State of Israel, like the United Arab Republic, are thriving.

Jew-hatred is not just a moral failing. It is poison. A movement that blames Jews for global problems will never create anything.

A society that commits itself to destroying Jews, in whole or in part, inevitably commits itself to its own destruction.

Nazi Germany could have built a European empire. Instead, it devoted much of its war effort to exterminating Jews — even when it came at the cost of military losses. Critical resources were diverted from the war effort to maintain death camps, and pillars of the economy were sacrificed to Jew-hatred, hastening the Axis’ defeat due to technology developed by the very Jews it exiled.

We see the same pattern in the Arab Republic of Egypt, where Jewish properties exist as ghostly reminders of a community that existed just a few decades ago. And we see the Islamic Republic of Iran, once one of the most advanced Islamic nations, squander tens of billions of dollars into the Syrian Arab Republic just to knock on the Jewish state’s borders.

Jew-hatred does not just fail its hosts. It actively destroys them from the inside.

When Nazi Germany fell, it was not just a military loss. It was a total ideological collapse. When the Soviet Union collapsed, it did not just lose the Cold War. It also destroyed the credibility of decades of propaganda. When Arab states began normalizing ties with Israel, it was not just about diplomacy. It was a recognition that the decades-long obsession with Jewish destruction had led nowhere.

The question is: who learns from history, and who repeats it?

Jew-hatred is suicidal. Societies that reject it thrive. Societies that embrace it wither.

For centuries, Jews were expected to silently accept our own oppression, as victims, collaborators, or bystanders. And every few generations, our efforts at self-determination, self-armament, and self-representation nearly flipped the equation. The Zionist movement finally pushed these efforts past the point of no return.

Jewish resilience shatters every prediction of our demise. Jewish sovereignty defies every attempt at our destruction. Jewish survival exposes every failure of those who bet against us.

Suddenly, we are not subjects of history — we are our own narrators, backed by force. We are not a footnote — we are our own story, backed by truth. 

https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/when-the-lie-becomes-the-system/

 

Thursday, March 20, 2025

We Should All FEAR RFK Jr.'s Agenda - Dr. Paul Offit - In the aftermath of the pandemic, we’ve talked a lot about the loss of public trust in science, but the collapse of trust in government, especially among the young, might be even more worrisome. (The pandemic really did a number on us.) One result is that many more Americans now seem to believe they should be in charge not just of choices about their own health but also of the entire health information ecosystem that informs those choices, as well.

There are currently trials testing the use of mRNA vaccines in cancer treatment, not to mention influenza and AIDS, with especially promising results so far for glioblastoma and pancreatic cancer, two of the deadliest forms. The five-year survival rate for pancreatic cancer is just above 10 percent; in two recent studies, funded in part by the N.I.H., mRNA vaccines prompted an immunological response in half of participants; among those, none experienced a relapse within 18 months, and three-quarters were still cancer-free three years later.

 

The Entire Future of American Public Health Is at Risk



The scariest thing about measles is probably not the related deaths, of which there have been two already this winter, the first in the United States in a decade. It may not even be the one-in-10,000 risk of irreversible lifelong paralysis, known as subacute sclerosing panencephalitis. Instead, it’s the much more common effect the virus can have on what’s called immunological memory — creating an immune amnesia that can devastate your ability to fight off future infections.

During the pandemic, when some worried Americans panicked over signs that Covid could damage immune response, they were mocked by minimizers for believing the novel virus was effectively airborne AIDS. The hyperbole applies more appropriately to measles: Before mass vaccination, the rapaciously infectious virus so ravaged the immune systems of children that despite its relatively low direct mortality rate, the virus could have been implicated in as many as half of all childhood deaths from infectious diseases, including pneumonia, sepsis and meningitis.

In the United States of our grandparents and our great-grandparents, 90 percent of children got measles, it’s now believed, killing 6,000 Americans on average each year around the turn of the 20th century and about 500 each year by midcentury, after better diets and antibiotics for complications came into the mix. In undernourished and immunologically naïve populations, the disease can be considerably deadlier, and measles eradication programs believed to be responsible for 60 percent of global improvements in childhood survival from vaccination over the last 50 years. One hundred million lives were saved worldwide by those vaccines, The Lancet calculated last year — two million lives, on average, every year.

That is an awful lot of lives for Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the new secretary of health and human services, to dismiss with a wave of his hand, instead choosing to sit down at Steak ’n Shake to celebrate the company’s new beef-tallow fries — recalling that, in his childhood, “everybody got measles,” and implying that immunity from those infections was preferable to the kind you get from a shot.

If that debate sounds familiar, it should, since arguments about natural versus vaccine immunity helped give shape to debate about whether the public-health establishment was overly cautious about Covid, too. As we exit what Siddhartha Mukherjee recently called America’s “privatized pandemic,” the country is feeling its way toward a new anti-establishment equilibrium — and anointing a new class of health leaders distinguished by their vocal skepticism and distrust.

In the aftermath of the pandemic, we’ve talked a lot about the loss of public trust in science, but the collapse of trust in government, especially among the young, might be even more worrisome. (The pandemic really did a number on us.) One result is that many more Americans now seem to believe they should be in charge not just of choices about their own health but also of the entire health information ecosystem that informs those choices, as well. Many regard well-being as something you can mold on your own at the gym or perhaps buy at the supermarket, in the supplement aisle — so long as you did your own research (at least listened to a good podcast) and brought your own list.

What is on that list isn’t necessarily important, as long as it runs against the establishment grain. Mehmet Oz is about to be confirmed as the head of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, for instance, though only 21 percent of the health recommendations he offered on his television program were judged by a group of researchers to have even “believable” evidence to support them. Kennedy stated that “there is no vaccine that is safe and effective” (he later claimed that the quote was “misused”) and has responded to the Texas measles outbreak not by urging everyone to get vaccinated but by shipping vitamin A. He has also praised steroids and cod liver oil — neither of which are part of routine treatment protocols, and neither of which have produced persuasive research suggesting they should be integrated into those protocols.

The MAHA movement rallies itself under the banner of reform, and it does raise undeniably important questions about why the richest country in the world is so much less healthy than its peers. But what it really heralds is a new age of public-health libertarianism, which is to say, a pretty explicit war on all the things that make health a “public” good, sustained by mutual aid, in the first place. At least, it marks the direction of change: away from solidaristic responsibilities and toward something both more suspicious and more solipsistic, by which individuals draw down biomedical capital accrued over many decades without feeling any real need to replenish the well.

Many MAHA priorities are worthwhile, at least in theory: chronic disease, obesity, diet and exercise and environmental contamination of various forms (ineffective but habit-forming pharmaceuticals, too). But in substituting individual behavior, diet and the your-body-is-a-temple model of human flourishing for germ theory, aerosol spread and what are often called the social determinants of health, the country’s new health leadership team is committing that cardinal American error: seeing individuals as perfectly autonomous and inviolable units, and defining everything outside individual control as either an irrelevant consideration or a violation of bodily autonomy.

In 2019, few Americans outside the anti-vaccine fringe would have told you that the country’s public-health apparatus was an overweening safetyist menace — or objected to the running of that apparatus, which hummed along in the background like white noise. All it took to wipe our memory of that relatively comfortable old status quo was a global pandemic that infected and killed at generational scale. Which does make you wonder how much the backlash even concerns the old systems, however imperfect they might have been, and how much it represents a simple objection to the turmoil of the pandemic itself.



Life is full of risk, as those most outraged about pandemic policies will often remind you, and we plot our way through it by way of choices defined by trade-offs — that is all true.

But the backlash does not merely concern Covid policies. Last week, the nomination of Dave Weldon to be the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was withdrawn, presumably because his anti-vax history made him unacceptable in the midst of a measles outbreak. But the same week the National Institutes of Health froze funding for research into vaccine hesitancy, implying that the agency was no longer worried about falling immunization rates or what could be done to reassure parents about risks. It is reportedly considering dramatically rolling back funding for H.I.V. prevention, and perhaps eliminating an in-house think tank devoted to reducing medical error and elevating standards of care. In just its first weeks under President Trump, the N.I.H. doled out a billion dollars less for research than last year — even though, by some estimates, every dollar spent is estimated to produce five dollars in social gains, and even though nearly all of the more than 350 drugs approved between 2010 and 2019 can trace their development to federal funding. The F.D.A. canceled the routine meeting of an advisory council devoted to formulating the next flu vaccine, in the midst of the worst flu season in more than a decade, with perhaps as many as 120,000 American influenza deaths since October.

As the United States watches the worrying spread of bird flu across the country, we aren’t even vaccinating our poultry, though 166 million commercial birds have died since the outbreak began, spiking egg prices and leaving Americans in front of empty grocery shelves with a foreboding sense of pandemic 2.0. (Kennedy has proposed simply letting H5N1 rip through the country’s bird population unimpeded, an idea floated by the new agriculture secretary as well.) At Johns Hopkins — where, until recently, the soon-to-be head of the F.D.A., Marty Makary, has held an endowed chair at the School of Medicine — $800 million in cuts to the United States Agency for International Development have forced the firing of more than 2,000. Johns Hopkins is not unique. Around the country, scientists are racing to delete the term “mRNA” from their grant proposals, worrying that any hint of a reference to the miraculous Covid vaccines that Trump raced to market the first time around will imperil funding for the countless promising possible future applications of the technology, some of them potentially even more miraculous.

How miraculous? There are currently trials testing the use of mRNA vaccines in cancer treatment, not to mention influenza and AIDS, with especially promising results so far for glioblastoma and pancreatic cancer, two of the deadliest forms. The five-year survival rate for pancreatic cancer is just above 10 percent; in two recent studies, funded in part by the N.I.H., mRNA vaccines prompted an immunological response in half of participants; among those, none experienced a relapse within 18 months, and three-quarters were still cancer-free three years later.

The truth is, we don’t know whether those results will hold up or scale. That, of course, is what research is for.

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/19/opinion/public-health-trump.html