Jonathan Rosenblatt - "Regular" Pervert or Very Ill Psychopath Pervert? |
The Rosenblatt case: Mentorship or abuse?
Just like Barry Freundel, Jonathan Rosenblatt used his rabbinic role to get his congregants and disciples unclothed.
When the news came out that Washington rabbi Barry Freundel filmed women that he had encouraged to immerse in his private mikveh, the entire community was shocked. Yet when allegations emerged about the rabbi of the Riverdale Jewish Center, Jonathan Rosenblatt, inviting boys as young as 12, college students, and rabbinic interns to sit naked with him in the hot bath and sauna, the reactions were inconsistent.
"But
Rosenblatt himself, "Internet Idiot" argues, had a “blind spot.” He suggests that
if the allegations had been publicized sooner, the rabbi and the
congregation could have come to a “happy and healthy compromise,” with
the rabbi avoiding censure and retaining his job. Relatively speaking, this is a “mild” case of
abuse. We don’t know of any sexual touching. And there is no proof about
his intentions being nefarious."
This means little, though, as only in rare cases do we have videotape. But two elements of this case make it clear that Rosenblatt’s case stepped over the line from bad judgment to malicious intent.
The presence of both allows us to distinguish between appropriate mentorship and abuse.
This means little, though, as only in rare cases do we have videotape. But two elements of this case make it clear that Rosenblatt’s case stepped over the line from bad judgment to malicious intent.
The presence of both allows us to distinguish between appropriate mentorship and abuse.
The first involves the sexually charged nature
of the encounters, as described in the New York Times article: “. . .
the rabbi openly gawked at a naked 12-year-old. He invited a 15-year-old
over for intimate nighttime conversations, during which he frequently
put his hand on the boy’s leg. He invited himself into a 17-year-old’s
living room and tried repeatedly to persuade him to change into a
bathrobe.” The descriptions of the encounters show the discomfort felt
by these children.
The second element is the abuse of authority.
The rabbi used his position as rabbi in order to arrange the sexually
charged meetings.
Both elements are required to make the case against Rosenblatt, or any other perpetrator. You can have naked men (or women) sitting around together in a neutral situation, like the mikveh (Jewish ritual bath) or sauna. That in itself doesn’t make it sexual. There is a religious or practical reason for being there. The men come on their own initiative, and can leave when they like.
But when you have an authority figure inviting younger boys and men to sit naked with him for long periods, you have malfeasance.
The Bronx District Attorney’s office agrees, asking others to come forward. Former sex crimes prosecutor Linda Fairstein told the New York Times
that “similar conduct could be construed as endangering the welfare of a
minor, a misdemeanor that includes knowingly acting ‘in a manner likely
to be injurious to the physical, mental or moral welfare of a child
less than 17 years old.'”
The law recognizes that an adult spending time
naked with children is a form of grooming. This erasure of boundaries
desensitizes them to the inappropriateness of the situation, and makes
children vulnerable to more harmful forms of sex abuse—whether by that
adult or someone else.
Either Rosenblatt’s actions, as he himself
claims, were unusual but innocent—or the actions were innately loaded
with sexual messaging and significance, thus sexually inappropriate. In
the latter case, the sauna invitations were not merely a matter of bad
manners or judgment. If that were the case, he would have stopped
when this was pointed out to him by his congregation.
He didn’t.
He didn’t.
If there was no sexual intent, it makes sense
for the synagogue to have kept a popular and learned rabbi on its
payroll. Yet look at how the Rabbinical Council of America recently
expelled Rabbi Marc Schneier for committing adultery. The rabbinical
board determined that extramarital sexual relations are not becoming for
a rabbi, at least once the fact was revealed in court after the breakup
of his fourth marriage. But Rosenblatt’s continued sexually charged
behavior with teens, and later young adults including rabbinic interns,
remained an open secret for many years with no official action taken.
The ones harmed saw their complaints ignored
and the perpetrator remain in his position. Meanwhile, the damaging
behavior continued. Unfortunately, similar scenarios takes place not
only in all branches of Judaism, but in every type of secular and
religious institutions. The modus operandi is generally the same:
Protect, defend, and excuse the leaders; silence the critics; ignore the
victims; and put future children at risk.
Just like Barry Freundel, Jonathan Rosenblatt
used his rabbinic role to get his congregants and disciples unclothed.
Can we really imagine a scenario in which Rosenblatt thought the only way to get through to his young charges was by sitting next to them with no clothes on? That makes as much sense as saying that Barry Freundel’s “practice dunks” in the mikveh were a necessary preparation for conversion, and not a pretext for videos to be viewed on a home computer.
Can we really imagine a scenario in which Rosenblatt thought the only way to get through to his young charges was by sitting next to them with no clothes on? That makes as much sense as saying that Barry Freundel’s “practice dunks” in the mikveh were a necessary preparation for conversion, and not a pretext for videos to be viewed on a home computer.
Perhaps one reason so many are willing to find
Rosenblatt innocent of abuse has to do with the Orthodox community’s
taboo against homosexuality. Although progress has been made in the
Jewish community toward accepting homosexual tendencies, we may not be
quite ready to recognize them in rabbinic leaders such as Rosenblatt or convicted offender Moti Elon.
It’s easier for 'Internet Idiot' to talk about a “blind spot.”
It’s easier for 'Internet Idiot' to talk about a “blind spot.”
We must not look for compromise when the
welfare of children are at stake, nor can we risk a “healthy and happy”
relationship with a community leader who has used his position to see
naked boys and be seen by them. Make no mistake. This isn’t an issue of
informal mentoring gone wrong.
Intentions matter. There are times to give the
benefit of the doubt, but when it comes to manipulation of innocent
children, we must keep our eyes wide open. A community that truly cared
about its members would see Rosenblatt’s abuse of power for what it is.
http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/the-rosenblatt-case-mentorship-or-abuse/