EVERY SIGNATURE MATTERS - THIS BILL MUST PASS!

EVERY SIGNATURE MATTERS - THIS BILL MUST PASS!
CLICK - GOAL - 100,000 NEW SIGNATURES! 75,000 SIGNATURES HAVE ALREADY BEEN SUBMITTED TO GOVERNOR CUOMO!

CLICK!

Monday, May 06, 2019

And yet these rabbis assert their opinion is nothing less than what has come to be called da’as Torah, or Torah authority, elevating their erroneous and dangerous views to the level of near prophesy.....

Da’as Torah and Anti-Vaxxers



In a recent article in the Forward, Rabbi Avi Shafran, the spokesman for Agudath Israel of America, the umbrella organization of American Charedi Jews, complained that the media was singling out the ultra-Orthodox as the prime culprits responsible for the measles outbreak in the United States. He implied that what underlay these media reports was not only anti-Charedi sentiment but actually unvarnished anti-Semitism. He pointed out that on the one hand there are many “anti-vaxxers” who are not Jewish, much less Charedim. On the other hand, what he called the “vast majority” of Orthodox Jews do have their children vaccinated.

On its face, Shafran is not incorrect. The problem is that he simply is not telling the whole truth. 

Indeed, it is the very leaders of his own organization who are telling their followers not to vaccinate their children if, for whatever reason, they don’t want to. Even more troubling, these same leaders are forbidding schools under their religious aegis to deny attendance to unvaccinated children.

Although ground zero for the outbreaks in America have been the Chasidic strongholds of Brooklyn’s Williamsburg and Borough Park neighborhoods, it is the non-Chasidic leaders of Agudath Israel who not only have justified opposition to vaccinations, but explicitly condemn schools that require vaccines as a prerequisite for attendance. They draw upon on mostly discredited studies and argue that the risk of complications from measles is minimal. They overlook the fact that the saving of life (pikuach nefesh) applies even in cases where the risk of death is minimal. Yet the risk is very real. I should know. Many years ago, my younger brother nearly died from complications of measles. It was only thanks to the proximity of a talented and energetic doctor that he survived the trip to the hospital.
The risk is very real. I should know. Many years ago, my younger brother nearly died from complications of measles.
And yet these rabbis assert their opinion is nothing less than what has come to be called da’as Torah, or Torah authority, elevating their erroneous and dangerous views to the level of near prophesy. No wonder ordinary Charedim are loathe to challenge the views of their respected leaders. To do so would be to risk expulsion from their tightly-knit communities.

Who are the men issuing these pronouncements? Two of them lead the Beis Medrash Govoha of Lakewood, N.J.: Rabbi Malkiel Kotler, its chancellor or Rosh HaYeshiva, and Rabbi Matisyahu Solomon, its moral tutor (to borrow a term employed at Oxbridge colleges) or mashgiach. They lead a yeshiva that is the most prestigious and the wealthiest school of its kind in the United Stares — in effect, the Harvard of yeshivas. No wonder their word is taken as law. 

But these men are not alone among the rabbinical anti-vaxxers. Rabbis Shmuel Kamenetsky and Aaron Schechter are, like Rabbi Kotler, members of the Moetzes Gedolei HaTorah — the Committee of Torah Sages — that dictates Agudah’s religious and secular policies. Rabbi Chaim Kanievsky, a leading Israel-based decisor for thousands of Charedim worldwide, has also, in the words of Rabbis Kotler, Solomon and Kaminetsky, “explicitly ruled that schools cannot refuse such [unvaccinated] children.” These rulings are not merely flouting science; their da’as Torah is endangering hundreds, perhaps thousands of younger children and older people who are especially vulnerable to complications from measles.

In the previous century, Agudah’s rabbis invoked da’as Torah to urge Europe’s Orthodox Jews not to emigrate to America or Israel in order to escape the Nazi onslaught. Until May 1948, they invoked the same principle to oppose the creation of the State of Israel. In the 1970s and ’80s, they invoked da’as Torah again to counsel against public demonstrations on behalf of Soviet Jewry. Now they invoke it to oppose vaccinations. And once again, as before, they find themselves on the wrong side of history.


Dov S. Zakheim was Under Secretary of Defense in the George W. Bush administration and Deputy Under Secretary of Defense in the second Ronald Reagan administration. He holds a doctorate from Oxford.

7 comments:

Mr. Cohen said...

Lubavitch [aka Chabad] often claims that their most
recent leader, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson,
was a prophet [navi], in addition to being the messiah.

There are three reasons why this cannot be true:

[1] Our Rabbis teach that prophesy ended with Malachi.

[2] Only THE SANHEDRIN has the authority
to officially recognize who is a prophet [navi].

Since wo have no Sanhedrin in our times,
nobody can be officially recognizes as a prophet.

[3] Except for Moshe and Aharon, a prophet [navi]
must begin his prophetic career in the Land of Israel.

Since Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson was NEVER
in the Land of Israel, not even for one day,
not even for one hour, not even for one second,
he could never be a prophet.

For decades, he never left New York City.
Except for cemetary visits, he never even left Brooklyn!

CONCLUSION:

Therefore, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson
could not have been a prophet.

But don't expect Lubavitch to accept logical proofs
where their precious and beloved Rebbe is concerned.

I give you my most unconditional guarantee
and my most sacred oath that they will NEVER
listen to you; never, NEVER, *** NEVER ***,
forever and ever and ever and ever and ever!!

Not only will logical proofs fail to change
their beliefs, but logical proofs will
also cause them to hate you and attack you.

How dare you critize the Rebbe, who we
accept as being above all criticism!!!

===================================
If you want the truth about Israel
and the Middle East, then do not waste
your time with the FAKE NEWS
of The New York Times and the
Israel-bashing mainstream-news-media.

Instead, visit these web sites:

www.jns.org

www.algemeiner.com

www.memri.org

www.aish.com

www.camera.org

www.UKMediaWatch.org

www.HonestReporting.com

===================================

Who are the Palestinians?

www.algemeiner.com/2019/02/14/the-invention-of-palestinians/

https://shilohmusings.blogspot.com/2018/06/who-are-palestinians.html

Ox Ferd said...

Dov Zakheim happens to be correct in his main points here but beware as he is a lay leader in the Open Orthodox movement.

I am from those who chant Moetzes Resign! together with UOJ, but Dov is wrong on at least 2 points.

There was a chiyuv for everyone to oppose the State before it was formed - think the pre-Moshiach Shalosh Shavuos. But that doesn't mean we have to be antagonistic to it now after it was done improperly. Dov seems to be conflating regular frum Jews with Satmar.

Even the real gedolim said quiet pressure on the Soviets would in most cases be more effective than rowdy street protests alongside hotheads trying to put themselves on the map, such as Avi Weiss. Remember that the Reform shvantz Wise ignored pleas to not organize a rabble against Hitler in the early days. Time Magazine reported Hitler's reaction to learning of the Jewish protest against him at Madison Square Gardens. He ran around on all fours taking bites out of the carpet in a rage then rose to his feet to give the go ahead for the Final Solution. If not for the pompous Wise who knows how many more Jews would have survived if say the decree was postponed by 6 months?

Paul Mendlowitz said...

There were visionaries like Rav Shraga Feivel Mendlowitz ZTL who understood that the State of Israel was a bracha from the RBSHO and did make a bracha with the Shem Havaya of Hatov V'hamaitev upon recognition of the State by the United Nations.

Ox Ferd said...

Is there a written teshuva with RSFM's reasoning on that? I am assuming he is going in the shitas haGr"a that what the freya did to be oyver on the Shavuah still results in a stage of bias Goel. But it doesn't mean we were allowed to facilitate it beyodayim beforehand.

Paul Mendlowitz said...

First - a b'feirush ArtScroll :-)...and my father
z"l and 3 uncles that were listening with him on a "borrowed" radio at the time of the UN announcement.

Methane Gas Scroll said...

Nosson Slurpman & Slopowitz published something that controversial in Artscroll? And you wouldn't believe how much benign stuff they classify as "controversial" to censor entirely or edit. Plus the chickens would have a practical reason in this case because Satmar nuts have been known to harass anyone publishing anything like that.

Paul Mendlowitz said...

RSFM was a pragmatist and a realist - the "aschalta d'geula" is different than the geula --- Yiden needed a safe haven --- Yes, him and R' Yoelish disagreed (almost) violently!