EVERY SIGNATURE MATTERS - THIS BILL MUST PASS!

EVERY SIGNATURE MATTERS - THIS BILL MUST PASS!
CLICK - GOAL - 100,000 NEW SIGNATURES! 75,000 SIGNATURES HAVE ALREADY BEEN SUBMITTED TO GOVERNOR CUOMO!

EFF Urges Court to Block Dragnet Subpoenas Targeting Online Commenters

EFF Urges Court to Block Dragnet Subpoenas Targeting Online Commenters
CLICK! For the full motion to quash: http://www.eff.org/files/filenode/hersh_v_cohen/UOJ-motiontoquashmemo.pdf

Wednesday, December 03, 2014

And on the Third Day....God said It Was Good (Ki Tov) ...Twice! Freundel's Blind Eye Was Never Turned

 December 2 at 2:35 PM  
A lawsuit filed Tuesday against a Georgetown synagogue and others accuses the sanctuary’s authorities of covering up a series of unusual practices of an influential rabbi, which the suit says allowed his alleged secret recordings of women in a ritual bath to go unchecked.



The lawsuit was filed by a Georgetown University Law School student, who accuses the rabbi, 62-year-old Barry Freundel, of luring her to the bath as part of her studies at the school. Among the unusual customs, the suit alleges, were the use of practice dunks before the bath, known as a mikvah, and encouraging non-Jews, unmarried women and students to use the bath as part of their studies, which runs counter to accepted Jewish practices.
Also named in the suit are the National Capital Mikvah, where the baths took place, and Georgetown University Law School, where Freundel taught.
Filed in D.C. Superior Court, the lawsuit seeks class-action status and identifies the plaintiff only as a third-year law student. “This case involves an unfathomable breach of trust by a Georgetown professor and religious leader and defendants’ utter failure to prevent and/or stop it,” Baltimore attorney Steven D. Silverman said in the lawsuit. He also said, “Defendants’ turned a blind eye to obvious signs of Freundel’s increasingly bizarre behavior, ignoring the bright red flags that Freundel was acting inappropriately with women subjected to his authority.”
The suit comes as the board that runs Kesher Israel synagogue and the National Capital Mikvah, the adjacent but separately administered bath, announced that they have terminated their contracts with Freundel, a nationally known arbiter of religious laws and a leader in conversions. He has been asked to vacate the rabbinic residence in Georgetown by Jan. 1. A mikvah is primarily used by people converting to Judaism and by religious women and men observing Jewish laws of ritual purification.
















D.C. police arrested Freundel in October and charged him with six counts of voyeurism. Police said they found a camera hidden in a clock radio pointed at a shower in the mikvah. Authorities said that an aide to the bath found the hidden camera. Police seized numerous computer storage devices but have not said if more women have been identified as victims.
Freundel is scheduled for a hearing in D.C. Superior Court Jan. 16.
Rachel Pugh, director of media relations for Georgetown University, declined to comment on the lawsuit. But she said in a statement: “We are horrified by the behavior reported to have taken place at the mikvah. The University is cooperating fully with law enforcement authorities on their investigation, as well as conducting our own investigation of Rabbi Freundel’s conduct.”
The suit alleges that Kesher Israel knew about past complaints but “simply passed” them to the Rabbinical Council of America — a major group of Modern Orthodox rabbis in which Freundel had been a leader — even though Freundel headed that group’s “protocol and standards” committee for conversions. The law student alleges that Georgetown “undertook no investigation into Freundel’s background prior to hiring him” and accuses the school of acting with “willful blindness.”
Religious experts have said that Freundel’s alleged practice of asking conversion students to take “practice dunks” in the ritual bath, before their actual conversion, was a problem. The concept has no basis in Jewish law and the Rabbinical Council of America said in a statement shortly after Freundel’s arrest that had they known of the dunks, it “would have engendered a more severe response.”
The Council was made aware in 2012 of complaints from conversion students who said Freundel was pressuring them to donate money and to do clerical work, but the board simply admonished him to stop.
Police say “many” women have come forward since Freundel’s arrest to say they used the bath and have declined to confirm an exact number. In many cases the women have no idea whether they were recorded. Silverman, the Georgetown law student’s attorney, said his client also does not know if she was recorded. He said she has not been given any updates from D.C. police, although she gave them a statement and a picture of her face so they can try to match it to images they may find on computer drives seized in searches of the rabbi’s home and synagogue.
Several students from Towson University have come forward to police to say Freundel took them to the synagogue and that some accepted his invitation to use the bath. Police searched Freundel’s office at Towson, where he was a tenured professor, and reported finding, in a bag, numerous cameras hidden in everyday household items, such as a tissue box and a key chain.
The lawsuit describes the Georgetown law student as “devoted to her Jewish faith” but chose to study at the Catholic University for its “reputation for excellency and diversity.”
The student says in the suit that Freundel invited her to services at Kesher Israel and that she joined his family for religious dinners at his home.

LOS ANGELES (AP) — A SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WOMAN HAS SUED BILL COSBY, CLAIMING THE COMEDIAN MOLESTED HER AROUND 1974...

Woman sues Bill Cosby, claiming underage abuse




LOS ANGELES (AP) - Bill Cosby was sued Tuesday by a Southern California woman who claims the comedian molested her in a bedroom of the Playboy Mansion around 1974 when she was 15 years old.
Judy Huth's sexual battery lawsuit does not specify how much she is seeking from Cosby, who has been accused by multiple women of sexual misconduct in recent weeks.
Huth's lawsuit filed in Los Angeles Superior Court, however, is the first time that a woman has claimed she was underage when she was abused, and it is the first lawsuit Cosby has faced claiming sexual abuse since 2005.
Huth's lawsuit states that she and a 16-year-old friend first met Cosby at a Los Angeles-area film shoot and the comedian gave them drinks a week later at a tennis club.
The lawsuit states that Cosby took them to the Playboy Mansion after several drinks. Her lawsuit states Cosby forced her to perform a sex act on him with his hand.
An email message sent to Cosby's attorney Martin Singer was not immediately returned.
Huth claims she suffered severe emotional distress and that she discovered its impact on her within the past three years, which allows her to file the lawsuit under California law.
"This traumatic incident, at such a tender age, has caused psychological damage and mental anguish for (Huth) that has caused significant problems throughout her life," the lawsuit states.

Tuesday, December 02, 2014

Following accusations of sex assault and fraud, four religious seminaries in Jerusalem have agreed to refund tuition to 13 American families.

Pninim - Jerusalem
The four girls seminaries — Pninim, Binas Bais Yaakov, Chedvas Bais Yaakov and Keser Chaya, which are located in Jerusalem and have a large number of American students — were sued in August in Chicago in a class action suit filed by families demanding their money back for the current academic year, after they became aware of sexual assault allegations against the rabbi who was running the seminaries at the time.
The plaintiffs, who did not claim Rabbi Elimelech Meisels had assaulted their daughters but who pulled their daughters from the seminaries after allegations by other girls surfaced, reached an out-of-court settlement with the seminaries last month. The seminaries agreed to refund tuition fees for the current academic year, the plaintiffs’ attorney Shneur Nathan confirmed to Haaretz.
Meisels, who is described in the suit as an American with a residence in Jerusalem, was accused by plaintiffs of sexually assaulting an undetermined number of American and Canadian girls at the seminaries between 2004 – around the time he "founded or co-founded" the seminaries – and 2014. Meisels has denied the allegations, according to an August article by JTA. Through his attorney, Meisels declined to comment to Haaretz.
According to the seminaries, Meisels is no longer in charge of operations.
In addition to Meisels, three other individuals, all of them American citizens, were also named as defendants - Yaakov Yarmish, a member of the seminaries’ management, who is based in Israel; Rachel Slanger, who according to the suit is Meisels’ sister and is based in the U.S.; and Rabbi Tzvi Gartner. According to the suit, Yarmish and Gartner were “believed to be in control of Peninim of America Inc.," the non-profit that handles financing for the institutions in the U.S., along with Meisels. Gartner is also a member of an Israeli beit din, or rabbinical court, established in wake of the accusations.
The other defendants named in the suit were the seminaries themselves; Peninim of America, Inc.; and “as yet unknown co-conspirators.” All defendants were accused by plaintiffs of fraud. Meisels is the only defendant against whom allegations of sexual assault have been made in the lawsuit.
'Under the radar'
No arrests have been made in the Meisels case in Israel, the only country with jurisdiction to prosecute.
David Morris, the head of Magen, an Israeli nonprofit that specializes in the prevention of child abuse and which has reached out to possible victims, told Haaretz that as far as he knows no complaints have been made to the police in Israel and that "to the best of my knowledge there is not yet a police investigation."
The case has slipped "under the radar" in Israel, says Morris.
When asked whether Israel Police are investigating or have investigated allegations of sexual assault by Meisels, police spokesman Mickey Rosenfeld told Haaretz, "No information on this matter was available from police." Asked whether anyone had lodged any complaints against Meisels to the Israel Police, Rosenfeld said only that "no information on this matter was available."
According to plaintiffs in the U.S. civil suit, Meisels used the seminaries as a "front" to "fraudulently and unlawfully take thousands of dollars from each of these parents and to induce these girls, by telephone, mail, wire and other means, to travel thousands of miles outside the United States and away from their parents for the purpose of sexually assaulting these vulnerable young girls.” The suit also alleged that students’ reputations were threatened - something that would jeopardize future marriage prospects in Orthodox circles - in order to keep them quiet.
In addition, in the suit the plaintiffs accused certain seminary staff members of complicity in defrauding parents of fees, and “as yet unknown co-conspirators” of “actively and passively concealing the assaults,” and of continuing to “cover up defendant Meisel’s sexual assaults and fraud by failing to report the assaults to the authorities.”
READ MUCH MORE:
http://www.haaretz.com/jewish-world/jewish-world-news/1.629377

Rabbi Heineman Calls For Seminary Girls To Stay In Baltimore For Seminary 


"Rabbi Heinemann was very clear, he does not think that Seminary in Eretz Yisroel is a good thing" ...

Rabbi Heinemann's letter minces no words. He notes the spiritual and physical risks associated with having one's daughter alone in Eretz Yisroel and writes that Ain Ruach Chachamim Nocheh Mizeh. He bemoans the terrible financial burdens these seminaries cause with their high costs and financial policies....
"....As Seminary has become more popular some remarkable developments have occurred. Many of the seminaries are businesses, they are set up as income generating tools to support the owners and the teachers. There is no fundraising arm, "scholarships" are really just discounts. There is no community Rabbinic or lay oversight either. These are dramatically different "Mosdos" than the ones we are accustomed to  supporting.
In many or even most cases they do not offer three meals a day or Shabbos meals. Girls are "placed" for these meals by families. Of course, efforts can be made that these placements are appropriate, but ultimately there is no way for anyone to take responsibility for this massive undertaking.  Obviously no Jewish community can expect all of its girls to fit into this mold B'ruchniyus or B'Gashmiyus. And Mechanchim agree, many girls are hurt in Israel irreparably, many girls waste their year with an inappropriate seminary and no way to change or deal with their problems. The only answer is local seminaries and there are options in many communities for these exact reasons...."


 MOREhttp://baltimorejewishlife.com/news/news-detail.php?SECTION_ID=1&ARTICLE_ID=54886

Monday, December 01, 2014

Disappointing US Orthodox Response to Har Nof Massacre -- The Orthodox community in the US has the ability to demand action when American citizens are murdered.



When American-born Orthodox rabbis are massacred by Palestinian Arab terrorists in a Jerusalem synagogue, one would expect at least American Orthodox leaders to respond vigorously. And the Orthodox Union this week did indeed issue a strongly worded statement condemning "incendiary rhetoric" and "demonization.”

 But contrary to what one might have thought, the statement was directed not at Palestinians but at Jews.

... So what should American Orthodox Jews be doing in response to the killings? So far, most Orthodox responses have focused on the need to pray with more sincerity or to more carefully obey halakhic strictures. We suggest an additional avenue.

They should inundate the White House, the State Department, and their Members of Congress, demanding action:

  *  Punish the Killers:  The Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, the second largest faction of the PLO, claimed responsibility for the massacre. Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas is chairman of the PLO. The U.S. should demand that he expel the PFLP.

  *  Pursue the Accomplices:  The State Department offers rewards for information leading to the capture of terrorists who kill Americans abroad. They should offer rewards to help capture the organizers and financiers of the Jerusalem massacre.

  *  Help the Families:  The Israeli government should not have to pay the medical and related expenses for Americans killed or wounded by Palestinian terrorists. Those costs should be deducted from the $500-million the U.S. gives to the Palestinian Authority each year.

So by all means--repudiate the words of a few Jews who, in their grief, say extreme or irresponsible things. But then focus the Orthodox community's attention and energy on practical steps that can make a real difference.

There is a time for prayer, and there is a time for action. The time for action is now.

Sunday, November 30, 2014

40,000,000 ---- 40 Million - AWESOME! THANK YOU ALL!

CLICK:
https://plus.google.com/106580239978263655484/posts

Why Israel Needs a Sex Offender Registry

Identify Sexual Offenders
In Your Area
 at the
Click of a Button
: http://www.kidslivesafe.com/signup/default.aspx?c=19&scn=adwordsKLS&sca=Master&vid=eb963a90c6604e9b81f7826956c0de1e



In 1989, a young boy named Jacob Wetterling went missing in St. Joseph, MN in the United States. A  massive search was conducted and numerous leads were generated and logged. These leads became the foundation of a massive database that brought about the development of a sex offender list in Minnesota.
Ever since then, every state in the United States has instituted a Sex Offender Registry that is open to the public. The contents of such a registry make public offenders names, pictures, form of offense, jail time and–most importantly–where they live. You might think that once a person has been convicted, let’s say, of pedophilia, he or she will find a hole to crawl into and not see the light of day again. Wrong! They move into communities, “normal” every-day communities. If neighbors are unaware of the presence of a pedophile in their neighborhood, there is nothing that they can do to protect themselves or their children. (There are over 750,000 [!] registered sex offenders in the USA; granted not all of them are predatory).
Over the years, since this move was taken of building such national and international databases, there have been arguments both in favor of and against such a registry. Before speaking about Israel, let’s take a brief look at some of the arguments, in general, both pro and con.
THE DEBATE IN THE UNITED STATES
  • PRO:
    Awareness of who is in your neighborhood and one can be careful and warn others.Registries are for protection. They let you know if there is anybody in your area who you need to watch out for.
  • They let people know what the person looks like and whom they target as victims. (If they target four year old girls, and you have a four year old girl, you know to take even greater precautions)
  •  Acts as a possible deterrent to future crimes.
  •  More easily monitored by Law Enforcement officials

CON:
  • It is a form of dehumanization and becomes a self-fulfilling prophesy
    People who read the list, fearful and ignorant, ostracize the offenders, mock them, drive them away. Society shuns the offenders and hurts them emotionally. Their offense becomes a scar FOR LIFE.
  •  For no other crime  does there exist a similar registry of offenders.
  • Often individuals take it upon themselves to eradicate these offenders. There are numerous cases where sexual offenders, even years after their crime, get murdered by their neighbors because they saw the offender’s name in an online registry.

What about Israel?
These are merely a small sampling of the various arguments on both sides of the issue. When you are speaking about Israel and Jewish neighborhoods, there are additional “negatives” that are raised:
  • It’s Lashon Hara (evil speech)
  • It will hurt a family’s chance for a shidduch (match) for their child
  • You are not providing a chance for the offender to do Teshuva (repent).

And yes, this list also can be longer.
Before addressing the need in Israel for such a registry, I want to address that last list of negatives. In the Halachot of Lashon Hara, one has the right (obligation) to protect his fellow man from injury, both physical and monetary. If, for example, you know an electrician does shoddy work or cheats, and a friend of your’s is going to use this individual, you have the right/obligation to inform him. (You may not exaggerate, but must just state the facts.) It is the same in this case: a pedophile can NEVER be rehabilitated…never. Therefore, that individual has put him/herself in the situation wherein the public may be informed of their presence.
The next argument against such a registry is it will make it more difficult to get a shiduch for the family members. This old canard has been brought out nearly any time there is an issue regarding “sex.” Be it child sex abuse, spousal sex abuse, etc. there are always those wishing to sweep it under the rug so as not to make it difficult to get that shiduch. While I GREATLY sympathize with the sentiment (after all, the offender’s daughter was not at fault!), we need to look at the ramifications: If a community is unaware of an offender for this reason and the individual continues to offend, he/she has created more and more VICTIMS, who will carry that with them for the rest of their lives! Balance that injury, pain and suffering with the difficulty in getting a shiduch to reportage and it seems to me that the solution is obvious.
As far as Teshuva–no one is beyond Teshuva and it eludes NO ONE. Every single Jew can repent. While the offender can not be cured, he can be monitored and can protect not only society, but also himself on his quest to do Teshuva.
So, why does Israel need a National Sex Offender Registry? Many reasons: Due to the taboo of the subject in so many circles (shiduch talk, etc)  it will finally bring the offenders out to the public eye and BY LAW require information to be public knowledge. The wrong of damaging someone’s ability to find a shidduch is much less than the damage done by a sex offender.
This is not a small, minor problem. There are weekly reports of new allegations, charges and convictions all the time against offenders.  As of 2009, there were 1300 sex offenders IN PRISON in Israel with no real numbers as to how many were not in prison. [See the formal website of the Israeli Prison Service. Available atwww.ips.gov.il (in Hebrew).] About 60 percent of convicted sex offenders in Israel have committed offenses against children under the age of 13. (ibid.)
It would give law enforcement officers a better handle on their ability to protect the public as the monitoring and reporting system would require compliance from the offenders. It helps to inform on a suspect pool in a certain area, in case of (G-d forbid), an attack. [While much of the above information relates to pedophilia, there is an equal amount of information regarding rape in Israel and the numbers continue to climb. As of 2007, the amount of rapes reported per year was over 3,000. (http://www.1202.org.il/English/template/default.asp?siteId=1&maincat=18)]
A brief article such as this is in no way meant to be an all-encompassing article to present all the arguments for such a registry. It is meant to raise a level of awareness and hopefully bring a dialogue on the subject to the Knesset. Remember, much of what has happened over the last 66 years in the Knesset has been due to social action and raising consciousness levels.
It is my hope that there are others out there who will read this, agree with it and be willing to also make the effort that this topic become part of the national agenda.
We need to protect our citizens from known terrorists, from unknown terrorists and from all other forms of violence. This is one area that has gone long enough with no “official” methods of protecting our citizens.
It is time to change that!


Read more: Why Israel Needs a Sex Offender Registry | Zev Shandalov | The Blogs | The Times of Israel http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/why-israel-needs-a-sex-offender-registry/#ixzz3KP3BIpHH
Follow us: @timesofisrael on Twitter | timesofisrael on Facebook

Wednesday, November 26, 2014

DISGRACEFUL!


OU Still Sponsoring Molester Defender Belsky in Passaic Thanksgiving Talk

Rabbi Yisroel Belsky
Yisroel Belsky
 Yisroel Belsky is notorious for collusion in kidnapping/torture, defending two generations of Kolko family molesters and Lawrence’s sex-abusing Rabbi (sic)Dovid Weinberger,  libeling parents of victims of abuse who report the crimes to the police, and issuing a kosher ruling that benefited his son-in-law. Nevertheless the OU retains him as a senior posek and is yet again sponsoring a talk in Passaic, NJ at 9:45 on Thursday, November 27. The event is co-sponsored by Passaic Clifton Community Kollel in the building of the more “modern” of Passaic’s two yeshivas, YBH (aka Hillel).

READ MUCH MORE:
http://frumfollies.wordpress.com/2014/11/25/ou-still-sponsoring-molester-defender-belsky-in-passaic-
thanksgiving-talk/

Modern Orthodox Day School, Kollel Invites Haredi "Protector Of Pedophiles" To Speak

Rabbi Yisroel BelskyThe Hillel Modern Orthodox day school in Passaic, New Jersey and its affiliated kollel (advanced yeshiva for married students, in this case, more of a community education and outreach organization rather than a traditional stand alone kollel) the Passaic Clifton Community Kollel (PCCK) has invited Rabbi Yisroel Belsky to speak and won't rescind the invitation, even though some parents complained.
READ MORE:
http://failedmessiah.typepad.com/failed_messiahcom/2014/11/modern-orthodox-day-school-kollel-invites-haredi-protector-of-pedophiles-to-speak-234.html

Tuesday, November 25, 2014

.....And Now The Bottom-Dwellers of Society --- Well, Reach For New Bottoms!

Ohioan, 57, directed woman to perform sex acts

Attorney Probed For Hypnotizing Female Clients
Hypnosis

View Document

Hypnotizing Attorney

  • Hypnotizing Attorney
NOVEMBER 19--An Ohio lawyer is under criminal investigation for hypnotizing a female client during meetings and directing her to engage in a series of sexual activities while in a trance and under his control, police report.
The probe of Michael Fine, 57, was detailed yesterday in an emergency court motion filed by the Lorain County Bar association, which is seeking an immediatesuspension of the lawyer, who has been practicing for more than 30 years.
According to the court records, a second woman recently told police that she believed that Fine sought to hypnotize her during meetings in his office (where the pair discussed the woman’s divorce case).
As detailed in an affidavit prepared by an investigator with the Lorain County prosecutor, “Jane Doe” hired Fine last year to represent her in a child custody matter. The woman recently contacted cops to report that she had “strange memories and feelings” after a series of meetings with Fine that occurred in his office and in a conference room at the county courthouse.
“She would be unable to recall substantial portions of the meetings, and afterwards she would realize her clothes and bra were out of place and moved, and her vagina was wet,” reported investigator Richard Thomas.
After being told by cops that “more definite evidence” was needed, the woman recorded her next two telephone conversations with Fine, and provided the tapes to police. As described by Thomas, one of the October recordings begins with a discussion of the woman’s court case, “but when Fine learns she is alone, he places her in a trance.” What follows, Thomas noted, “is of an explicit sexual nature, wherein he induces her into multiple orgasms.”
The bar association motion charges that Fine (pictured above) used “code” words to induce “Jane Doe” to “enter a trance-like stage.” While his client was hypnotized, Fine told her that she was “being made love to by the world’s greatest lover” and that he was her “teacher.” The attorney also assured “Jane Doe” that she “will appear normal and only remember their discussions regarding legal matters,” Thomas stated.
An October 21 phone call followed a similar script, with Fine inducing “Jane Doe” into a trance after a “short conversation about her case.” During the call, Thomas reported, Fine told the woman he would cause her “horniness and arousal and excitement” and a “life-changing experience.” The bar association complaint adds Fine told the woman that their encounters were “a secret and no one’s going to know, right.” Fine, who directed the woman to bring a vibrator to their next office meeting, ended the call by saying, “You’ll only recollect what we were talking about your case until we see each other tomorrow. Do you understand?”
Armed with the audio recordings, criminal investigators fitted “Jane Doe” withaudio and video recording devices in advance of a November 7 meeting in Fine’s office.
As agents monitored the sting operation, Fine hypnotized “Jane Doe” and directed her to sit on a couch. “Fine begins sexual dialogue, explaining sexual acts that he will do for her,” Thomas reported. Cops busted into the room as Fine was seated next to the woman “holding and massages her hand and rubs her shoulders.”
As recounted in the bar association motion, Fine told the woman that “you will insist to me that I touch you in any way that brings you pleasure,” and that “you are free to touch yourself. To play with yourself. To get yourself off. Have every experience that you so crave and desire.” The lawyer also told “Jane Doe” that “you are going to demand that I touch you and you touch me. Do you understand?”
State investigators provided bar association officials with copies of telephone recordings made by “Jane Doe” and a DVD of her November 7 office meeting with Fine.
A second female client, identified in court filings as “Jane Doe 2,” has alleged that Fine “was attempting to hypnotize her” during meetings in his office. The woman, who hired Fine in September to represent her in a divorce action, told bar officials that he repeatedly discussed “relaxation and meditation techniques” with her.
During one meeting, “Jane Doe 2” recalled, Fine sat beside her and touched her fingers, forearm, and forehead. He asked if her arms felt “weightless” and directed her to “place her finger tips together and imagine two green dots coming together.” Fine then told her to focus on his voice while he counted down from ten, saying that she would experience a “wave of relaxation” that would cause leave her eyes feeling heavy. He added that she should “think of a happy place--the sounds, the smell, etc..”
The woman reported that in her after-hours meetings with Fine he would comment on “her looks and physical appearance” and asked about the nature of her sexual activity with her husband, including whether they had “rough sex.”
“Jane Doe 2” added that she “felt the loss of time during her meetings…as she cannot recall how so much time passed during the meetings for what she remembers discussing.”
After recently learning that Fine no longer worked at his law firm, “Jane Doe 2” told one of Fine’s former partners that she “felt as though she might have been hypnotized,” the attorney recommended that she contact the local prosecutor’s office (where she subsequently met with Investigator Thomas).
“Jane Doe 2” told bar association officials that she felt “creepy and disgusted” by Fine’s conduct, and was sick that he “picked her out” after she was “so upset and distraught about her marital situation when she went to him.”
In seeking Fine’s immediate suspension, the Lorain bar association argues in its Ohio Supreme Court that the attorney “poses a substantial threat of serious harm to the public.” Fine is married to a court reporter and is the father of two daughters. (13 pages)

Monday, November 24, 2014

"Through the years I’ve supported women who have had to sit and watch their rapists lead tefillot, or suffer as their abusers are celebrated as among the great Jewish leaders."...


Jewish Men Behaving Badly
By  | Tagged 

“Wear red lipstick when you meet with him,” warned a grad student. I only vaguely understood what she meant. The man in question was a revered academic scholar. His taking time to meet with a lowly undergraduate was an honor. His advanced years and disheveled fashion clouded my naïve ability to see him as a sexual predator. 

But after he began calling me sweetheart, asking me to sit up in the front row during class, and putting his hands on my thighs under the table, the meaning of her warning became crystal clear. I always wore lipstick and stopped going to closed door meetings.
The arrest and charging of Rabbi Barry Freundel was a terrible shock to most. But in reading some of the first-person accounts of encounters with Freundel, a pattern has emerged of a man whose abuse of power was not entirely unknown but never publicly challenged.

 From Toronto, in the county in which I grew up and love, similarly the story of Jian Ghomeshi, a former rock star turned popular radio host, has uncovered tales of years of abuse and exploitation spoken about quietly and never explicitly published or charged.
Reading these now public accounts has opened up floodgates of personal memory and laid open the implicit challenge that comes when men in power abuse or harass women, in particular young or vulnerable ones.

 And having grown up in and become a professional in the inner circles of the Jewish community, the memories and stories come from inside our “kodosh kodoshim,” our holiest of places and institutions.
When I was 19, I was invited to a high-level meeting of my student group being held in the Old City in Jerusalem. As Shabbat descended, I found myself in a small private bedroom where the only other female leader was sleeping soundly.

 I was flattered that our executive director had sought me out to discuss some of the upcoming business; I was political, ambitious and believed in the causes we were activists for. But at some point he began undoing the zipper on my dress and pushing me down on the bed. I told him to cut it out but that was only mildly effective. I remember my confusion. Young and sexually inexperienced, I was not attracted to this man. He was someone I respected. I did not want to wake my roommate.

 He told me not to fuss. The Shabbat siren wailed; my roommate woke and we went to pray. Over the mechitzah, he continued to leer at me and my confusion turned to anger.
At dinner, I made sure not to be seated with him, but at some point when he made a comment about changing that, I stood up and said before all assembled that I had not come to be physically or religiously pressured. All conversation stopped. I looked a fool, I am sure, but the harassment stopped there.
I was proud of myself. I felt empowered. But it was no easy feat. No one, not even the other female on the board, ever asked about my outburst. This was not surprising. At other retreats I had seen board members stick their penises in the faces of sleeping friends, and others prey on underage girls.

Sexualization and harassment were part of the culture, and if I wanted to play in the big leagues I had to be strong enough to deal with it. So as hard as it was, I internally spun the story as one of pride for my ability to talk up, playing down the utter humiliation and isolation.
My brashness came in no small part from an understanding of my self worth (thanks to my ima for that) and the Jewish values that were part of the same education package the men I knew had grown up with. But there was also a piece that I would come to understand only with time. The stakes were low and the violation, while upsetting, relatively minor. I had little to lose by speaking up.

 The harassment, while troubling, had not crossed in my mind that imaginary line that often makes the shame too hard to overcome for the sake of reporting. This man, while in a position of power, was of increasingly little consequence in my life and I did not worry about direct retribution. And finally, I was young and still not fully aware that holding men accountable for abuse of power could and often does have repercussions that can add layers of trauma.
I wish I could say that that is the end of this story. Through the years I’ve supported women who have had to sit and watch their rapists lead tefillot, or suffer as their abusers are celebrated as among the great Jewish leaders. I personally have had to face inappropriate behavior from men in the Jewish community. Sometimes I’ve spoken out, and sometimes not. I’ve avoided some very bad situations because even when women don’t speak up publicly they share information quietly. With the help of this informal network, I’ve avoided getting into elevators alone with particular men. I’ve chosen not to engage in conversations with certain men or pursue specific opportunities.
The good men of the Jewish world far outweigh those who abuse their power. But abuses, small and large, exist and come at a cost. Women rarely have the opportunity to speak up and push back, for when we do, we risk at best being told that we are too sensitive (what I was once told by a colleague when I objected to being told to “stop acting like a wife”) or at worst that we brought it on ourselves (what I was told when I recounted the Old City story to a loved one). We risk being labeled as difficult, getting a reputation as too outspoken or jeopardizing employment if we challenge the wrong people.

Sometimes we walk away from the Jewish world, because it is just too hard to live in close quarters with those who betray our trust or because the values that are supposed to come from the holiest place are the same ones that are used to overlook deplorable behavior.
As I watch a new generation of young women begin to take their places in the Jewish world, I wish for them more safety and less exploitation. But barring that, I pray that they have the strength to find the support that they need when they need it, so that they remain safe and holy in body and spirit. In lieu of protection I cannot guarantee, I offer this advice: take the rumors to heart.

No level of observance, power, or privilege is immune to men who exploit their manhood. And if bad things happen, do not blame yourselves. It is not your fault. You did not bring it on yourselves. You are holy, created in the image of God. No one has the right to treat you otherwise.