EVERY SIGNATURE MATTERS - THIS BILL MUST PASS!

EVERY SIGNATURE MATTERS - THIS BILL MUST PASS!
CLICK - GOAL - 100,000 NEW SIGNATURES! 75,000 SIGNATURES HAVE ALREADY BEEN SUBMITTED TO GOVERNOR CUOMO!

EFF Urges Court to Block Dragnet Subpoenas Targeting Online Commenters

EFF Urges Court to Block Dragnet Subpoenas Targeting Online Commenters
CLICK! For the full motion to quash: http://www.eff.org/files/filenode/hersh_v_cohen/UOJ-motiontoquashmemo.pdf

Sunday, May 12, 2024

It is time to tell Rich Uncle Joe and Chuck the Schumer to take their money and stuff it. They can go take weapons and stuff it. They just gave us the excuse to flatten Rafah


The message of defeating Hamas in Rafah without Biden


13th Avenue Rafah

Have you ever personally been in a position in which you always relied on someone else’s financial support so that you could realize your goals and dreams? Like a father or mother or rich uncle. Or, let’s say, like a miserable dictatorial tyrannical father-in-law? (Just saying . . .)

And did that support sometimes come with strings? Strings that not only tied your hands but curtailed your dreams? (Just saying . . .)

Have you ever reached a moment in your life where you decided “Either I spend the rest of my life toeing to his every command, and later look back ruefully on my deathbed wishing I could go back in time and live the life I had wanted to live — or I tell him right now to stuff his money, and I will be liberated to return to living the life I was meant to live, to pursue my dreams? (Just saying . . . )

So you stopped being an attorney at a major law firm, where you were earning a boatload of money, and returned to being a rabbi because that was your calling? (Just saying . . .)

There is nothing in all the world that compares to standing on your own two feet, living the life you were called to live, the life you want to live, even though now struggling to make it work financially without that old standby monetary support you always had relied on, but now figuring out how to do it yourself, albeit with G-d’s primary help.

This is Israel’s moment right now.

It is time to tell Rich Uncle Joe and Chuck the Schumer to take their money and stuff it. They can go take weapons and stuff it. And then do what obviously must be done: go into Rafiach (Rafah) with guns blazing and aerial bombs dropping, and utterly eradicate Hamas, and — if necessary — flatten that region of Gaza like a tortilla. Indeed, as a humanitarian gesture after flattening the region like a pancake, drop gallons of maple syrup.

But what if innocent civilians are hurt?

First of all, which innocent civilians are we talking about?

-The ones who, in a free and democratic election supervised and validated by Jimmy Carter, elected Hamas to be their voice and actualize their dreams of wiping out Israel?

-Or are we talking about the innocent civilians who danced in the streets of Gaza every time Hamas started a war, Israel fought back until a ceasefire, Hamas declared victory, and the masses danced in the streets?

-Or the innocent civilians who danced in the streets and distributed candies to children when Bin Laden took down the Twin Towers on 9-11?

-Or the innocent civilians who crossed the border into Israel on Shabbat Shmini Atzeret of October 7 and also raped women, and also murdered babies, and also plundered every bit of merchandise from furniture to food in the refrigerators of the murdered Jews?

So which innocent civilians are we worrying about here?

-The ones who refuse to leave Rafah because Hamas wants them to stay as human shields?

-The ones who have lived for years in homes throughout Gaza with entrance points to Hamas underground tunnels etched into the floorboards of their homes, in their children’s bedrooms, under cribs and beds?

Well, here’s the thing. Uncle Joe and Chuck the Schumer won’t give Israel the precision weapons that Congress authorized, capable of pinpointing targets. So Israel will just have to make do with older weapons that sort of come close to their targets, give or take a few buildings or blocks. In the end, it’s like what my Mom of blessed memory would say when, as a finicky boy, I complained that, although I like peas and I like carrots, I don’t like it when the can contains a mixture of peas and carrots together. “David,” she z"l would say, “What’s the difference? Mixed or separate, it’s all going to end up in the same place.” Words to live by (though I still don’t like them mixed).

Same here. An embargo on precision weapons to avoid hitting unintentional targets? Eh, what’s the difference? Rafah needs to be flattened anyway.

Israel does not need America, Uncle Joe, or Chuck the Schumer. (Chuck always told American Jews that his last name means “Shomer” — Guardian of Israel. In reality, G-d Almig-ty, who never slumbers nor sleeps, is the Guardian of Israel. As we now know from Ancestry.com, “Schumer,” by contrast, means “Good for Nothing.”)

Israel has enough firepower to handle Rafah on her own. And the act of doing it without Biden and Chuck the Schumer will be liberating, as it was for that once-young man who finally broke from his controlling source of funds and determined to make it on his own. He was liberated, and the message was sent: “No one but G-d Almig-ty controls me or bosses me around anymore.”

Likewise here, too, the message it will send the Arab world is extraordinary: “If you think Israel needs America to wipe out enemies and flatten regions, think again. It’s just that we sometimes miss, now that we can’t get the precision stuff, so apologies in advance if we accidentally kill more of you and destroy more buildings than we intended.”

Israel had far fewer weapons in 1948 when Harry Truman, who gets far more credit than he deserves, imposed a brutal arms embargo on Israel as she was fighting for her life against seven Arab armies only a few years after Hitler had murdered six million. She had almost no weapons. The Guardian of Israel fixed that. The heck with Truman. Anti-Semitic Poland trained and armed the Irgun, the Lechi, and the Haganah. Czechoslovakia sent weapons. Italian American mafiosi and Irish American dockworkers colluded with young Jewish teens in running guns illegally to Israel. There was always someone.

In 1956, America again turned her back, this time under Eisenhower, so DeGaulle and France stepped in.

In 1967, France backed out, so others stepped in, and — in desperation — Israel defied the pressure of the Americans and launched the preemptive strike that beat the Arabs and liberated the rest of Jerusalem, Judea and Samaria, the Golan — and, yes, Gaza — in less than a week.

In 1973, Nixon — despite all the anti-Semitism expressed on his secretly recorded White House tapes — rushed to the rescue, even over the objections of the Schumer House Jew of that day, Heinz Kissinger. It’s always someone. Even a wild hotel-and-casino developer who came outta nowhere to recognize United Jerusalem as the capital and move the American embassy there, and recognize sovereignty over Golan and the legality of Jewish communities throughout Judea and Samaria, and who now has moved toward taking “The Two-State Illusion” off the table.

G-d always sends someone. Obama and Kerry left office by slashing Israel with a parting stab, refusing to veto U.N. Security Council resolution 2334, which declared even the Kotel (Western Wall) to be occupied Arab territory. Months later the American embassy in Israel was being opened to the public, moved from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, and Trump Administation officials were traveling to the Kotel, wearing kipot, putting notes in the Wall. G-d has an endless list of messengers.

It’s always someone. America pressed Ben-Gurion not to declare independence. Well, next week will be the 76th anniversary of his telling the U.S. to stuff it. Even dear Ronald Reagan pressed Israel not to go after Saddam Hussein’s nuclear reactor. So Menachem Begin did it anyway, with G-d’s primary help — and, even though Reagan condemned it at the time, Americans fighting years later in Kuwait against the same Saddam blessed Begin for it.

Biden does not matter. It does not take a prophet of G-d to prognosticate that Israel will outlive Biden. Kamala and her “Jewish husband” with his non-Jewish anti-Israel daughter do not matter. Throughout Jewish history: been there, done that. Rather, the blessing will be that, if Biden and Kamala no playa the game, they no make-a the rules.

Israel can go it alone, and it will be with the blessings of a majority of the American public. She will show that all the riots on American college campuses and the louts in the White House cannot tell her how to live. She will live very, very well despite them. She will earn another layer of international respect, as she did when she grabbed those five gunboats that France embargoed even though Israel had paid for them.

And Arabs will watch and take notice. They will see that Gaza has been bombed into the Stone Age, and they will contemplate how their own countries and landmarks would look if converted to dust and rocks. And especially in Judea and Samaria, where Abu Mazen (Mahmoud Abbas) still presides, the message will be even more clear: “Talk and bombast all you want. But if you cross a line, the same destiny will unfold in the rest of Judea and Samaria as unfolded in 1967 when Jordan overplayed their hand. Jericho, Shechem (Nablus), Bethlehem — we hear them calling, Mother Rachel crying for her sons because they are not there. Our hope is not lost, and the sons will return to their true borders. Just give us an excuse, chabibi (pal).”

It all is a blessing.

To receive Rav Fischer’s Weekly Extensive Torah Commentaries or to attend any or all of Rav Fischer’s weekly 60-minute live Zoom classes on the Weekly Torah Portion, the Biblical Prophets, the Mishnah, Rambam Mishneh Torah, or Advanced Judaic Texts, send an email to: shulstuff@yioc.org

His 10-part exciting and fact-based series of one-hour classes on the Jewish Underground liberation movement (Irgun, Lechi, and Haganah) and the Rise of Modern Israel can be found here. In it, he uses historic video clips of Irgun, Lechi, and Haganah actions, decades of past Arab terrorist atrocities, as well as stirring musical selections from the Underground and video’d interviews of participants, to augment data, statistics, maps, and additional historical records to create a fascinating, often gripping, and scholarly enriching educational experience about issues that remain deeply relevant today as Israel engages in an existential war in Gaza against Hamas terrorism.

His latest deeply moving weekly series of informational and inspirational programs on the Hamas Gaza war may be found here.

His 40-part Bible Study series covering all of I Samuel (First Samuel) intensively with Talmudic and Midrashic commentaries is now up here.

Thursday, May 09, 2024

The character of presidential candidates, shown in their treatment of others, should matter greatly to voters. We don’t know how every member of the jury will vote, but regular American voters will have an opportunity to show that basic decency still matters.


The Tawdry Decade of Trump Could Desensitize Any Juror



Not long after Donald Trump was criminally charged in four state and federal cases last year, many people who want to see the former president held to account expressed an understandable fear: A MAGA mole would sneak onto the jury and then refuse to vote guilty, no matter how damning the evidence.

The resulting hung jury would be just the vindication that Mr. Trump needs. But following Stormy Daniels’s dramatic testimony on Tuesday in Mr. Trump’s New York hush-money case, which delved into graphic detail about what she said was a brief, unpleasant encounter with Mr. Trump in 2006, I am inclined to worry about a more mundane but similarly grave threat: call it the Desensitized Juror.

This person, a decent and upstanding citizen who treats his or her duty with appropriate gravity, could nevertheless decide that all of this tawdriness — cheating on his new wife, seducing Ms. Daniels with false promises of reality-TV stardom and so on — is just Mr. Trump being Mr. Trump. Even if hiding the purpose of the $130,000 payoff to Ms. Daniels violated New York law, the juror might think, so what? 

Everyone already knows Mr. Trump is a liar and a cad, a womanizer and a cheat. Is this really a serious crime or is it, like so much connected to the Trump lifestyle, just one big tabloid joke?

The tabloid element of the case has been there all along, of course, but it was never more evident than on Tuesday. Again and again, Ms. Daniels testified in much greater detail, and with more editorializing, than was asked of her. Mr. Trump’s lawyers objected often, and when they didn’t, Justice Juan Merchan stepped in himself, testily warning Ms. Daniels more than once to “just answer the questions.”

Prosecutors, who made a calculated and possibly dangerous bet in calling her to the stand, could not have been happy to watch one of their star witnesses get reprimanded over and over by the court. But the judge’s frustration was no surprise; salacious details like the ones Ms. Daniels kept offering can be especially prejudicial to a defendant. In response, the former president’s lawyers requested a mistrial. Justice Merchan denied the request, although he agreed that numerous parts of Ms. Daniels’s testimony were “better left unsaid.”

Even when she left out the details, Ms. Daniels was not always consistent in her testimony. She insisted, for example, that she was not motivated by money and only wanted to tell her story, a less-than-convincing claim given her decision to accept Mr. Trump’s payoff to keep her mouth shut. Mr. Trump’s lawyers took every opportunity they could to highlight these inconsistencies and poke holes in Ms. Daniels’s credibility.

The prosecutors no doubt made their risky decision because it would have been quite strange if they had not brought in Ms. Daniels to testify. Their whole theory of the case is based on Mr. Trump’s reaction to a few minutes with her in a Lake Tahoe hotel room. Jurors are human, and they have common-sense human reactions. What would they think if one of the two central characters in the story didn’t show up to confirm the underlying conduct?

This brings us back to my concern about the impact of Ms. Daniels on the jury. Remember, the prosecution needs all 12 jurors to agree to convict; the defense needs only one to disagree to produce a hung jury and thus a mistrial. So far, the prosecutors have presented a very strong case centered on financial documents and testimony from the people who helped Mr. Trump arrange the payoff. But they have also had to do a lot of explaining about how it all fits together and why it all matters, which risks confusing and exhausting the jurors. Now, with the most garish part of the case front and center, it’s not so hard to imagine one or more jurors throwing up their hands and letting the tabloids sort it out.

I continue to believe strongly in the jury system as a core institution of American self-government and in the integrity of this group of 12 regular New Yorkers. The problem is the damage done to American society over the past nine years, a sense of lowered expectations about politics that affects all of us, including those of us selected for jury duty.

During that period, Mr. Trump upended every reasonable expectation of how a presidential candidate, a president and then an ex-president should behave. In the process, he managed to do exactly what many farsighted people warned he would: inure large parts of the public to his depredations against honesty, integrity and decency. He has, in effect, increased our tolerance for inexcusable behavior by our leaders.

That is a tragedy on several levels. It can be easy to forget how shocking it was when, in October 2016, a tape emerged on which Mr. Trump could be heard years before bragging about grabbing women’s genitals. Top Republicans withdrew their support for their party’s nominee only weeks before the election, and the G.O.P. came achingly close to extracting itself from Trump mania. In that light, it makes sense that Mr. Trump would do whatever he could to keep the Stormy Daniels story out of the news. At the time, it really could have been a death blow.

And that would have been the proper outcome. Mr. Trump was seeking the highest office in the country, the most important position of public trust we have. Ms. Daniels’s story, which she would have told at the time but for the payoff, has offered yet another window into his awful treatment of other people, especially women, and the manner in which he sought to keep Americans from knowing about it.

It is essential to remember the unspoken premise underlying the hush-money trial: As even Mr. Trump appeared to understand in 2016, the character of presidential candidates, shown in their treatment of others, should matter greatly to voters. We don’t know how every member of the jury will vote, but regular American voters will have an opportunity to show that basic decency still matters.

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/08/opinion/the-tawdry-decade-of-trump-could-desensitize-any-juror.html

Wednesday, May 08, 2024

TORAH UMESORAH BREAKING NEWS - STORMY DANIELS TAKES THE STAND!


וְלִמַּדְתֶּ֥ם
אֹתָ֛ם אֶת־בְּנֵיכֶ֖ם לְדַבֵּ֣ר בָּ֑ם בְּשִׁבְתְּךָ֤ בְּבֵיתֶ֙ךָ֙
וּבְלֶכְתְּךָ֣ בַדֶּ֔רֶךְ וּֽבְשָׁכְבְּךָ֖ וּבְקוּמֶֽךָ׃
 

Ms. Daniels, who received $130,000 in hush money to keep silent about her account with Donald J. Trump, is the biggest witness to testify so far in the case.


ON THE STAND

Donald Trump told Stormy Daniels 'you remind me of my beautiful daughter,' court hears

 


Monday, May 06, 2024

"Every individual with firsthand knowledge or reasonable cause for suspicion of child abuse has a Torah obligation to promptly notify the proper civil authorities."

 

Rabbi Perr Z"L - He was one of the first rabbis to stand strong against child molesters in Jewish education.

 "The undersigned, affirm that any individual with firsthand knowledge or reasonable basis to suspect child abuse has a religious obligation to promptly notify the secular law enforcement of that information. These individuals have the experience, expertise and training to thoroughly and responsibly investigate the matter. Furthermore, those deemed “mandated reporters” under secular law must obey their State’s reporting requirements.

Lives can be ruined or ended by unreported child abuse, as we are too often tragically reminded. The Torah’s statement in Leviticus 19:16, “Do not stand by while your neighbor’s blood is shed” obligates every member of the community to do all in one’s power to prevent harm to others. In conclusion, every individual with firsthand knowledge or reasonable cause for suspicion of child abuse has a Torah obligation to promptly notify the proper civil authorities."


Rabbi Yechiel Perr

Sunday, May 05, 2024

The Pathetic Realisim of Today - How did this happen, this sea change in American consciousness?

 

Jews may win Nobels, but the Gazan terrorists are the geniuses New Nazis!

 

What subterranean think tank created the plan to force it to stand alone against the world after brutalizing it in a manner unthinkable to the civilized mind?



Pro-Palestinian protesters maintain an encampment on Columbia University campus on April 24, 2024.  (photo credit: JEENAH MOON/REUTERS)
Pro-Palestinian protesters maintain an encampment on Columbia University campus on April 24, 2024.

Jews may have a lion’s share of the Nobel Prizes, but I’m beginning to think that the smartest people on Earth are Palestinians. Make that Gazan Palestinians. No, Gazan Palestinian terrorists. Only geniuses could make a proud, strong country like Israel a universal pariah in six short months; Israel, a country full of freedoms and democratic ideals, much admired, armed, educated, and moneyed, courted by even its most powerful Arab neighbors. What subterranean think tank created the plan to force it to stand alone against the world after brutalizing it in a manner unthinkable to the civilized mind?

And how did that brain trust prepare the ground for such a coup? Perhaps long before October 7, these meddling geniuses took note of growing worldwide antisemitism, sowed seeds of the same in American and European universities and streets, while magnifying Israel’s fractured politics. Presto! An army of activists were nestled in their palm ready, eager for deployment.

Most American students, like those who mounted an antisemitic protest at Columbia University in April, will tell you that Israel is guilty of genocide, which trumps all other guilts. It would help if these instruments of social justice knew what the word meant, especially to Israelis and Jews. 

How Hamas terrorists turned Israel into a pariah

It would also help if they did some due diligence and read Hamas’s genocidal charter, calling for the elimination of the Jewish people “from the river to the sea,” a fundamental phrase conveniently obscured or falsely denied by its authors. Meanwhile, attacks from the South, attacks from the North, and death by urban terrorism plague Israel daily, and none of these cap-and-gown warriors raise a fuss.

Do they listen when respected, worldwide experts report that the Israelis employ more methods to prevent civilian injury than any other army in all of military history? According to the UN, a normal war statistic would reflect nine times as many civilian as combatant deaths, while Israel statistically reflects 1.5 civilian to each combatant death.

 

A STUDENT protester waves a Palestinian flag above Hamilton Hall on the campus of Columbia University in New York City on Tuesday.  (credit: MARY ALTAFFER/REUTERS)
A STUDENT protester waves a Palestinian flag above Hamilton Hall on the campus of Columbia University in New York City on Tuesday.
 

But the young adults-made-children incapable of hard analysis by authoritarian, proselytizing professors do not believe it. Their minds are closed, their reading perversely curated. Across the US, cowards cancel the Jewish concert, book talk, speech, fundraiser. By their mealy-mouthed protestations about the safety of the public and their employees, they endorse the shutting down of museums, the defacement of paintings, the blocking of highways because it is easier to cancel Jews than it is stand up to the intimidation of bullies, even intellectually juvenile ones.

How did this happen, this sea change in American consciousness? We are less religious than ever before, that’s part of it. We are barely connected to community, apart from the ephemeral, endlessly seductive type online. We marry less, have fewer children, are not especially tied to our jobs. Having in our slumberous excess discarded a heritage of ideals and law, we are rootless, empty, prey to whoever wants to fill our heads with their self-serving ideas. Even those clinging to the old ways will not be saved by them. The propagandists are legion, and we are all lost. In a world where “the best lack all conviction, while the worst are filled with passionate intensity” (thank you, W.B. Yeats), there is no path out of darkness.

The God of the Jews instructed His people to be “a light unto the nations.” But it seems a multitude of American Jews cower before the escalating antisemitism of our time. They remain silent in the shadows but whisper their despair only to each other. They grieve the taking of hostages but fail to defend Israel’s prosecution of a just war. This must end. Voices must be raised and shouted from the rooftops.

If they do not, some day a new, braver generation may rise up, one fierce in rebellion against its elders, quick to spot hypocrisy and corruption and act against them. If the beatniks and the hippies could rise up against the gray flannel that smothered and cowed young people in the 1950s and ‘60s and transform the world, this new generation in a reborn age might breathe back reason into us.

But where will they get this wisdom? Imagine all the books that might teach them are suppressed, canceled, while the entire world suffers the same disease of willful ignorance. The heel of intolerance will be on their necks. How will their souls come to understand that they have been muted, restrained, and that if they rebel, they will blossom? Who will guide them there?

Damn sure they’re going to need some Jews. May enough of us survive!■

 

https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-799565?

Friday, May 03, 2024

Religion doesn’t need to be abolished—merely fixed - No miracles allowed - The truth really does matter - Reality is more magical than miracles

 

10 Brilliant Insights from Daniel Dennett 

 

אִם יֹאמַר לְךָ אָדָם יֵשׁ חָכְמָה בַּגּוֹיִם, תַּאֲמֵן, הֲדָא הוּא דִכְתִיב (עובדיה א, ח): וְהַאֲבַדְתִּי חֲכָמִים מֵאֱדוֹם וּתְבוּנָה מֵהַר עֵשָׂו. יֵשׁ תּוֹרָה בַּגּוֹיִם, אַל תַּאֲמֵן, דִּכְתִיב: מַלְכָּהּ וְשָׂרֶיהָ בַגּוֹיִם אֵין תּוֹרָה.

איכה רבה ב׳:י״ג

 

A glimpse of a mind jammed to the rafters with ideas. 

 


Article Lead Image

Daniel Dennett, who died in April at the age of 82, was a towering figure in the philosophy of mind. Known for his staunch physicalist stance, he argued that minds, like bodies, are the product of evolution. He believed that we are, in a sense, machines—but astoundingly complex ones, the result of millions of years of natural selection.

Dennett wrote more than a dozen books, some of them aimed at a scholarly audience but many of them directed squarely at the inquisitive non-specialist—including bestsellers like Consciousness Explained, Breaking the Spell, and Darwin’s Dangerous Idea. Reading his works, one gets the impression of a mind jammed to the rafters with ideas. As Richard Dawkins put it in a blurb for Dennett’s last book, a memoir titled I’ve Been Thinking: “How unfair for one man to be blessed with such a torrent of stimulating thoughts.”

Dennett spent decades puzzling over the existence of minds. How does non-thinking matter arrange itself into matter that can think, and even ponder its own existence? A long-time academic nemesis of Dennett’s, the philosopher David Chalmers, dubbed this the “Hard Problem” of consciousness. But Dennett felt this label needlessly turned a series of potentially-solvable problems into one giant unsolvable one: He was sure the so-called hard problem would evaporate once the various lesser (but still difficult) problems of understanding the brain’s mechanics were figured out.

Can we build from an account of rudimentary, strained aboutness all the way to human consciousness?

Because he viewed brains as miracle-free mechanisms, he saw no barrier to machine consciousness, at least in principle. Yet he had no fear of Terminator-style AI doomsday scenarios, either. (“The whole singularity stuff, that’s preposterous,” he once told an interviewer for The Guardian. “It distracts us from much more pressing problems.”)

As keen as the workings of his mind may have been, Dennett was among the least pretentious of scholars. As one journalist noted, he dressed “like a Maine fisherman”; for many years, he and his wife, Susan, spent their summers in a farmhouse a five-hour drive north of Boston. His passions extended beyond science and philosophy: He mastered at least five musical instruments—for a time he earned money as a jazz pianist—and, in spite of his avowed atheism, sang Christian hymns like “O Hearken Ye” like a practiced choirboy.

To give a sense of the breadth and depth of Dennett’s thinking, we have compiled here 10 snippets from his writings and from interviews he gave over the years.

The mind is a “user-illusion” that we mistake for reality
And what is this self? Not a dedicated portion of neural circuitry but rather like the end-user of an operating system. … Curiously, then, our first-person point of view of our own minds is not so different from our second-person point of view of others’ minds: We don’t see, or hear, or feel, the complicated neural machinery churning away in our brains but have to settle for an interpreted, digested version, a user-illusion that is so familiar to us that we take it not just for reality but also for the most indubitable and intimately known reality of all. That’s what it is like to be us. We learn about others from hearing or reading what they say to us, and that’s how we learn about ourselves as well. This is not a new idea, but keeps being rediscovered apparently. The great neurologist John Hughlings Jackson once said, “We speak, not only to tell others what we think, but to tell ourselves what we think.”
From Bacteria to Bach and Back (2017)

Free will is a fantasy, but a welcome one
The traditional view of free will, as a personal power somehow isolated from physical causation, is both incoherent and unnecessary as a grounds for moral responsibility and meaning. The scientists and philosophers who declare free will a fiction or illusion are right; it is part of the user-illusion of the manifest image. That puts it in the same category with colors, opportunities, dollars, promises, and love (to take a few valuable examples from a large set of affordances). If free will is an illusion then so are they, and for the same reason. This is not an illusion we should want to dismantle or erase; it’s where we live, and we couldn’t live the way we do without it. But when these scientists and philosophers go on to claim that their “discovery” of this (benign) illusion has important implications for the law, for whether or not we are responsible for our actions and creations, their arguments evaporate.
From Bacteria to Bach and Back (2017)

Consciousness runs on multiple parallel tracks at once
According to the Multiple Drafts model [of consciousness], all varieties of perception—indeed, all varieties of thought or mental activity—are accomplished in the brain by parallel, multitrack processes of interpretation and elaboration of sensory inputs. Information entering the nervous system is under continuous “editorial revision.” For instance, since your head moves a bit and your eyes move a lot, the images on your retinas swim about constantly, rather like the images of home movies taken by people who can’t keep the camera from jiggling. But that is not how it seems to us. People are often surprised to learn that under normal conditions, their eyes dart about in rapid saccades, about five quick fixations a second, and that this motion, like the motion of their heads, is edited out early in the processing from eyeball to … consciousness.
Consciousness Explained (1991)

Darwinian evolution has extraordinary explanatory power
Let me lay my cards on the table. If I were to give an award for the single best idea anyone has ever had, I’d give it to Darwin, ahead of Newton and Einstein and everyone else. In a single stroke, the idea of evolution by natural selection unifies the realm of life, meaning, and purpose with the realm of space and time, cause and effect, mechanism and physical law. But it is not just a wonderful scientific idea. It is a dangerous idea. My admiration for Darwin’s magnificent idea is unbounded, but I, too, cherish many of the ideas and ideals that it seems to challenge, and want to protect them. … The only good way to do this—the only way that has a chance in the long run—is to cut through the smokescreens and look at the idea as unflinchingly, as dispassionately, as possible.
Darwin’s Dangerous Idea (1995)

No miracles allowed
The two related philosophical problems I was trying to solve—at least in outline—can be rendered quite straightforwardly. First, how can it be that some complicated clumps of molecules can be properly described as having states or events that are about something, that have meaning or content? And second, how can it be that at least some of these complicated clumps of molecules are conscious—that is, aware that they are gifted with states or events that are about something? You and I have thoughts and ideas and hopes and fears and we know that we do, and we can tell others about them. How is that possible? … Can we build from an account of rudimentary, strained aboutness all the way to human consciousness? That is the task that any physicalistic or materialistic theory of the mind must execute. No miracles allowed.
I’ve Been Thinking (2023)

Cultural evolution can mimic biological evolution 
The concept of cultural replicators—items that are copied over and over—has been given a name by Richard Dawkins, who proposed  [in his 1976 book The Selfish Gene] to call them memes, a term that has recently been the focus of controversy. For the moment, I want to make a point that should be uncontroversial: Cultural transmission can sometimes mimic genetic transmission, permitting competing variants to be copied at different rates, resulting in gradual revisions in features of those cultural items, and these revisions have no deliberate, fore-sighted authors. The most obvious, and well-researched, examples are natural languages. The Romance languages—French, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, and a few other variants—all descend from Latin, preserving many of the basic features while revising others. Are these revisions adaptations? That is, are they in any sense improvements over their Latin ancestors in their environments? There is much to be said on this topic, and the “obvious” points tend to be simplistic and wrong, but at least this much is clear: Once a shift starts to emerge in one locality, it generally behooves local people to go along with it, if they want to be understood.
Breaking the Spell (2006)

Religion doesn’t need to be abolished—merely fixed
Does religion “poison everything,” as my dear, late friend Hitch [Christopher Hitchens] insisted on saying? Only in a very attenuated sense, I think. Many things are quite harmless in moderation and poisonous only in quantity. I understand why Hitch emphasized this view; as a foreign correspondent he had much first-hand, dangerous experience with the worst features of religion, while I know of all that only at second hand—often from his reportage. I, in contrast, have known people whose lives would be desolate and friendless if it weren’t for the non-judgemental welcome they have received in one religious organization or another. I regret the residual irrationalism valorized by almost all religion, but I don’t see the state playing the succoring, comforting role well, so until we find secular successor organizations to take up that humane task, I am not in favor of ushering churches off the scene. I would rather assist in transforming these organizations into forms that are not caught in the trap of irrational—and necessarily insincere—allegiance to patent nonsense.
“Letting the Neighbours Know,” a chapter in The Four Horsemen: The Conversation that Sparked an Atheist Revolution (2019)

Behavior is predictable
Here is how it works: First you decide to treat the object whose behavior is to be predicted as a rational agent; then you figure out what beliefs that agent ought to have, given its place in the world and its purpose. Then you figure out what desires it ought to have, on the same considerations, and finally you predict that this rational agent will act to further its goals in the light of its beliefs. A little practical reasoning from the chosen set of beliefs and desires will in most instances yield a decision about what the agent ought to do; that is what you predict the agent will do.
—The Intentional Stance (1987)

The truth really does matter
The real danger that’s facing us is we’ve lost respect for truth and facts. People have discovered that it’s much easier to destroy reputations for credibility than it is to maintain them. It doesn’t matter how good your facts are, somebody else can spread the rumor that you’re fake news. We’re entering a period of epistemological murk and uncertainty that we’ve not experienced since the middle ages.
The Guardian, Feb. 12, 2017

Reality is more magical than miracles  
Some people don’t want magic tricks explained to them. I’m not that person. When I see a magic trick, I want to see how it’s done. People want free will or consciousness, life itself, to be real magic. What I want to show people is, look, the magic of life as evolved, the magic of brains as evolving in between our own ears, that’s thrilling! It’s affirming. You don’t need miracles. You just need to understand the world the way it really is, and it’s unbelievably wonderful. We’re so lucky to be alive! The anxiety that people feel about giving up the traditional magical options, I take that very seriously. I can feel that anxiety. But the more I understood about the things I didn’t understand, the more the anxiety ebbed. The more the joy, the wondrousness came back.
—Interview in the New York Times Magazine, Aug. 27, 2023

https://nautil.us/10-brilliant-insights-from-daniel-dennett-567922/?utm_source=pocket-newtab-en-us

Thursday, May 02, 2024

“The responsible authorities :-)))) - are working on a plan for the gradual recruitment of haredim into the IDF, and initial plans are due to be completed within several weeks. LOL! OMG!

 


State to Supreme Court: ‘Planning underway for immediate enlistment of haredim’/Bench Kvetchers

 

State responded to Supreme Court on recruitment of haredim: ‘Authorities are formulating a plan for gradual recruitment of haredim.’

The law does not enable imposing sanctions for not meeting draft targets. Draft Office

The State responded to the Supreme Court on Wednesday, saying that the IDF and the Ministry of Defense are formulating action plans for the immediate recruitment of haredim, as well as actions that will also affect longer term recruitment.

Discussions examined various alternatives for preparing the security forces to accept members of the haredi community, taking into account the diverse complexities related to the size of the population, its characteristics, and the needs of the ongoing war.

The Supreme Court of Justice was provided an update that, “The responsible  :-)))) authorities are working on a plan for the gradual recruitment of haredim into the IDF, and initial plans are due to be completed within several weeks. The state has emphasized that it will update the Supreme Court with the details, in anticipation of the discussion on appeals submitted on this issue.

Two weeks ago State Attorney, Gali Baharav-Miara, approved for the government to have separate representation in the Supreme Court on the Draft Law.

Approval was given after Cabinet Secretary Yossi Fuchs asked the Deputy State Attorney, Gil Limon, to authorize the government to have separate representation in the Supreme Court hearing on the petitions filed against the draft exemption for the haredi sector.

According to Fuchs, the Supreme Court of Justice avoided stipulating that haredim must be recruited according to the issued orders, and the answer submitted on behalf of the legal counsel – and not according to the Prime Minister's opinion – also stated that a supplementary affidavit must be submitted to the Supreme Court.

Fuchs mentioned Netanyahu's request to give the government 30 days to formulate agreements concerning the haredi draft, including the required administrative work, saying "The court has accepted the Prime Minister's request, and therefore any directive of the State Attorney to take action in order to recruit yeshiva students is contrary to the Supreme Court's decision."

"There is no way of bridging the fundamental gap between the State Attorney’s position and the government's position, both on the recruitment issue and the support issue, and it deems fit that in such a far-reaching public issue – even more so, in the midst of a war – separate legal representation for the government in these petitions must be approved," wrote Fuchs.

 

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/389252?utm_source=activetrail&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl


Wednesday, May 01, 2024

Who Is the Most Famous Circus Clown? ---- Soldiers? Meh! Bench Kvetchers Keeps Him In Power!

Rabbi Yitzhak Yosef

Number 1
Rabbi Yitzhak Yosef - His performance style was characterized by his ability to evoke deep emotions from his audience, often making them laugh and cry at the same time.
Emmett Kelly

2 - Emmett Kelly

Emmett Kelly is considered one of the most famous circus clowns of all time. He is best known for his character "Weary Willie," a hobo clown that he played for over 50 years. Kelly's performance style was characterized by his ability to evoke deep emotions from his audience, often making them laugh and cry at the same time. 
 

Chief rabbi: In whose merit were we saved? The Chief of Staff's?

 

Rabbi Yitzhak Yosef slams heads of hesder yeshivas, who demanded he rescind his statements.

 

Chief rabbi under fire for crediting yeshivas, not army, with Israel’s survival in war

 

Critics slam Rabbi Yitzhak Yosef, with one retorting that by that logic, the rabbi himself ‘should go to jail with his supporters for their failure on October 7’


Rabbi David Stav, the chairman of the modern Orthodox Tzohar organization, which offers religious services to Israelis and is seen as an alternative to dealing with the ultra-Orthodox-dominated Chief Rabbinate, also condemned Yosef’s comments.

 
Rabbi David Stav,

“There is no contradiction between recognizing the importance of the Torah and those who study, and the duty to obey the Torah’s orders and go to war to save Israel from its enemies,” he said.

He added that the chief rabbi’s “words of disdain against the IDF chief of staff and soldiers in the midst of the war are ungrateful and blasphemous.”

*

Sephardic Chief Rabbi Yitzhak Yosef spoke Saturday night about the missile barrage on Israel, saying that the Torah learners are the ones protecting the citizens of Israel.

"Thirteen thousand missiles were thrown at the country - what miracles. By whose merit is it? In the merit of the Chief of Staff? In the merit of the Torah learners, the yeshiva students. This is the correct perspective," he said.

"A few hesder yeshiva deans...called on me to rescind my statements. I said that I will not rescind them. Anyone who does not believe in this is a heretic."

Last month, Rabbi Yosef drew ire for comments on the Draft Law, when he said, "There are young men who are serving in reserves there, not everyone merits to learn Torah. We all merited to be yeshiva students who are exempted from the army? But the Tribe of Levi is exempted from the army. They do not draft them, under any circumstances. No matter what. If they force us to join the army - we will all travel abroad. We will buy tickets...there is no such thing."

"All of these secular people who do not understand this - they need to understand that without the Torah, without the yeshivas - there would be no existence, they would not have success in the army. Whatever is successful, the army, it is only in the merit of the soldiers.... sorry, the Torah learners. The soldiers are successful in the merit of the Torah learners. Rabbis, everyone needs to say this with pride. Yes, we busy ourselves with Torah, and the Torah is what protects us."

 

https://www.timesofisrael.com/chief-rabbi-under-fire-for-crediting-yeshivas-not-army-with-israels-survival-in-war/?utm_source=The+Daily+Edition&utm_campaign=daily-edition-2024-04-28&utm_medium=email

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/389110?utm_source=activetrail&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

Sunday, April 21, 2024

“‘How do I know it is all true?’ חותמו של הקדוש ברוך הוא אמת – the seal of the Holy One, blessed be He, is truth.

 ***

(ו) חֲנֹ֣ךְ לַ֭נַּעַר עַל־פִּ֣י דַרְכּ֑וֹ גַּ֥ם כִּי־יַ֝זְקִ֗ין לֹֽא־יָס֥וּר מִמֶּֽנָּה׃

(6) Train a child in the way they ought to go; they will not swerve from it even in old age.

 When I was in high school, the yeshiva tore out the 30 or so pages on evolution in the biology textbook. I checked the index which somehow they missed, so I trotted down to the library to read everything I could on evolution. I survived and thrived, but I never forgave the hanhala for not realizing there will be a time this information will be available to everyone. Klainer kep (small heads) PM ***

 

תּוֹרַת ה' תְּמִימָה, מְשִׁיבַת נָפֶשׁ; עֵדוּת ה' נֶאֱמָנָה, מַחְכִּימַת פֶּתִי.

https://youtu.be/auzUaf9z08U?si=N773O88BEBYRh_BU

The Fifth Question Many are Afraid to Ask

 
 
The Fifth Question Many are Afraid to Ask

The full-page advertisement above appeared in the past few editions of Hamodia Newspaper and Bina Magazine, both media publication for the Ultra-Orthodox world.

It reads:

“‘How do I know it is all true?’
The question hovers in the mind of many children, who may be embarrassed or too afraid to voice it. 3326 years after Matan Torah, the very basics of Emunah need reinforcement.”

According to the project’s website, in the last few years they have hosted classes and presentations for more than 15,000 people.

Here is a selection of some of the classes that took place:

  • Los Angeles – Substantiation of the Revelation at Sinai, 300 attendees
  • Borough Park – The Sinai Event Really Happened, 150 attendees
  • Zurich & Manchester – Torah’s Divine Origin, 75 attendees
  • Williamsburg – How We Know Our Torah is Real, 30 attendees
  • Toronto – The Revelation at Sinai, 40 attendees
  • Zurich – Present Day Korachs… Several pesukim to prove Torah can only be Min Hashomayim, 200 attendees
  • Monticello, NY – Sustaining Emunah in Hashem and Torah from Sinai, 400 attendees
  • Tustan, NY –The Sinai Story Is Really True, 75 attendees
  • Manchester, UK –Rambam on Our Trust in M. Rabenu, 120 attendees
  • Manchester, UK – Torah-Min-Hashamayim, 230 attendees
  • Lakewood, NJ – “Torah Min Hashamayim” Q&A Session, 120 attendees

The fact that this advertisement targets the Ultra-Orthodox and Chasidic communities, where for many the mere question is considered taboo, reveals, to my mind, the deep underlying challenge Judaism and the broader Jewish community is facing. One would think that the Ultra-Orthodox would be the last segment within the broader Jewish community open to admitting the weakness in its own ranks. Nevertheless, there is a reason this advertisement targets the Chareidi and Chasidic communities.

On some level, Ultra-Orthodoxy is able to acknowledge the problem because it still believes it has answers to “prove” that tradition is literally true. But herein lies the problem for the broader Jewish community. The approach used by the Ultra-Orthodox to address these questions will sound silly, even embarrassing to many in the Modern Orthodox communities. How, then, are they to deal with the questions? After all, as the saying goes, “Don’t ask questions to which you don’t want to know answers.”

Ironically, this problem forces the more scientifically and academically educated communities to avoid and even deny the existence of questions, and they end up even less engaged than the Ultra-Orthodox community in these important questions.

This is why I founded Project TABS - TheTorah.com. Like my Chareidi brothers and sisters, I too believe that there is a crisis of faith and engagement in our world and it needs to be addressed head on.

 Where I disagree with the Ultra-Orthodox approach is that I don’t think the responses can or should be given in a way that tries to negate or avoid modern scientific and academic approaches.

 חותמו של הקדוש ברוך הוא אמת – the seal of the Holy One, blessed be He, is truth. I believe that the truth frees us – not that it frees us from Torah but it frees us to appreciate Torah in its true context.

Rabbi David D. Steinberg is the co-founder and director of TheTorah.com - Project TABS. He learned in Manchester Yeshiva, Gateshead Yeshiva, and Mir Yeshiva. Steinberg took the Ner Le’Elef 
 
https://www.thetorah.com/blogs/the-fifth-question-many-are-afraid-to-ask

Friday, April 19, 2024

I speak now to our enemies, who sacrifice their own families in order to destroy ours: Fear us. Fear the men who value peace, but are dragged to war. Fear the men whom you’ve forced to leave their families, and who would do anything to return to them. Fear the warriors you have created with your senseless cruelty, with your hate. With your passion for blood and violence. Fear those who don’t fear you, who see you for what you are.

 

I am a father and a soldier. I have a message for our enemies (Jewish Ones As Well -Those Who Mock Us For Sacrificing Our Lives For Our ONE Jewish Country)

 

To those who sacrifice their own families in order to destroy ours: Fear us. Fear the men who value peace, but are dragged to war 
 
 
With my son, moments before returning to Southern Gaza in January 2024
 
 

The last few moments. Moments of peace, of love, of home. Fleeting moments, moments that never remain. Moments I had experienced countless times already, too many times.

My bag was packed. My boots were at the door. Uniform hung on the chair, rifle leaned against the table. Nothing to do but wait. We had been expecting an Iranian attack for some time, but who knew what would actually happen. The week passed by, Shabbat came and went silently. And then, the first reports came in: A confirmed launch. War.

For the next few hours we all held our breath, and then the booms began. Some ran to their shelters; others ran to the windows to watch the lights overhead. Some cowered in fear as shockwaves shook their apartments. I did none of these things.

To some, the booms meant definite war. It meant their kids not going to school, or their work being closed. Or flights being canceled. It meant possibly spending days in the bomb shelter. 

To me, the booms meant one thing. I felt it as I stood by my son’s crib, looking down at his beautiful, perfect face. The booms meant that I would once again have to leave him. Leave him to go to a place I might not come back from. I had flashbacks to the first few weeks of his life, when I held him in my arms, uniformed and backpacked. Kissing him goodbye, I turned, tears in my eyes, and walked toward the vehicle that would take me back to Gaza. And here I was again, after two short months home, facing the same heart-wrenching moment. 

How could I possibly explain to him that I was protecting him by leaving him? That I was protecting his mother, and his grandparents? Or his future friends at school? If something happened to me, God forbid, would he understand? Would he forgive me? What do you do when duty and honor tell you to go but your heart screams at you to stay? You tell yourself that nothing in this world matters more than your child but then you willingly leave them. How is that possible?

I’m not special. Fathers all over the country make this decision, and I’m certain it tears them apart, just like it does me. But we go anyway. Most of us come home; to that hug, that kiss, that “I love you,” that smile. But some of us don’t, and the hug waits, the smile disappears.

As another boom hit, my phone rang, and my heart sank. At that moment, I didn’t care about the mission, or the context, or what was at stake; I just wanted to stay. To hold him, to tell him that Abba is here, that everything is ok. But deep down I knew that I couldn’t, and as I answered the call, the countdown of my last few hours at home, the last few hours with my wife and son, began. 

I speak now to our enemies, who sacrifice their own families in order to destroy ours: Fear us. Fear the men who value peace, but are dragged to war. Fear the men whom you’ve forced to leave their families, and who would do anything to return to them. Fear the warriors you have created with your senseless cruelty, with your hate. With your passion for blood and violence.  Fear those who don’t fear you, who see you for what you are. Your atrocities have only strengthened our resolve, your brutality has only fueled our determination. You seek to destroy an unbreakable people, with an unbreakable spirit. We will win this war. We will return victorious to and for our children. And you will not stand in our way. 

* * *

Postscript: My unit is already back home, awaiting further orders.

https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/last-moments-at-home-and-a-message-to-our-enemies/


Avi Kahn is a father and husband living in Bet Shemesh. He made Aliyah from Columbus, Ohio in 2015 and served in the IDF as a Lone Soldier in the Paratrooper Brigade. He has fought on multiple fronts in the current war, including Kfar Aza on October 7th, Southern Gaza, and Israel's Northern border.

Thursday, April 18, 2024

Imagine If Rabbi Doron Perez, Father of fallen IDF officer Captain Daniel Perez, Was Told By The Brainless Rabbi Don Segal (Or Other Torah Moral Midgets), That His Son Died For Nothing - That If He Would Have Been In A Yeshiva He Would Have Helped Israel - Not Being In The IDF!

Father of fallen hostage: My son fought with incredible bravery


Rabbi Doron Perez, whose son was killed in action on October 7th and his body taken to Gaza, speaks about receiving the final news last month and urges the world not to allow soldiers to be forgotten during prisoner exchange negotiations.


Rabbi Doron Perez, Chairman of World Mizrachi and father of the fallen IDF soldier Captain Daniel Perez, spoke with Arutz Sheva - Israel National News about the ordeal of losing his son.

“From 6:45 in the morning until 9:01, he was in his tank with his crew, fighting with incredible bravery. Families we didn't know visited us while we mourned to say that his tank might have made the difference for them. When the second wave of terrorists came, that crew rushed their tank directly at them. It was two and a half hours of incredible heroism.”

At the beginning, Daniel Perez was declared missing and later his definition changed to hostage. Only a few months later, on March 16th, did the IDF declare that Captain Daniel Perez was dead, that he was killed in action on October 7th and that his body is being held by the Hamas terror organization in the Gaza Strip.

When the army officials asked Rabbi Perez to meet, he knew what the knock at his door meant: “I could read between the lines that it wasn't good news. You're never ready for something like that, but we were as ready as we could be. They weren't certain at first, because all they had was a video, but after review by doctors, the ISA, and the Chief Rabbinate, it was declared that there was no doubt it was him, and that he was dead.”

Apart from his own loss, Rabbi Perez shares the pain of other families of hostages. “There are going to be 133 people who will not be at the Seder this year. I've never known such pain in my life, and to know that there are other families feeling that is mind-boggling. We must do everything to bring them back.”

He referred to an important step in the process of negotiating a prisoner exchange deal. “It's harder to see male soldiers as a matter of humanitarian exchange, and we are worried that they might be forgotten. I said there's no greater humanitarian act in the world than a young man or woman who puts their life on the line to save people from an illegal invasion. In a world of political agendas, it's important that our children not fall by the wayside.”

He gives his advice for the approaching holiday: “The Haggadah, in which we read the story of the Exodus at the Seder, isn't just nostalgia - it's happening now. This year, we will once again taste both of the bitter herbs and bread of affliction of of those in Gaza, and the taste of freedom represented by the Passover sacrifice, which it's supposed to be the last taste in our mouths at the end of the night.”

 

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/388598?utm_source=activetrail&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

Wednesday, April 17, 2024

Baruch Hashem "Pilot N" - was not a Bench Kvetcher -According to Pilot N, without the work his squadron did, “some of the threats would have reached Israel, God forbid.”

 

IAF pilot to 'Post': Defense op was most meaningful flight of my career

 

At approximately 10 p.m. on Saturday night, N and his fellow pilots were alerted that it was time to take to the skies.



 N AND his copilot prepare their aircraft for takeoff. N was an active member of Israel’s defense systems that were activated Saturday night when Iran targeted Israel with hundreds of drones and missiles. (photo credit: IDF SPOKESPERSON'S UNIT)
N AND his copilot prepare their aircraft for takeoff. N was an active member of Israel’s defense systems that were activated Saturday night when Iran targeted Israel with hundreds of drones and missiles.   

 

“This past Saturday, I flew on the most meaningful flight I have ever made,” Maj. N, an Israel Air Force (IAF) pilot in Squadron 122 who has been on reserve duty since October 7, told The Jerusalem Post on Monday.

He was referring, of course, to Israel’s broad defense operation amid the multifaceted airstrikes launched by the Islamic Regime, titled Iron Shield.

While N was faced with disappointment on Friday when he told his wife that he would not be coming home that night – or that entire weekend, for that matter – he was filled with both “excitement” and “focus,” once he was briefed on the historic operation he would be partaking in.

The IDF – and, indeed, the world – understood quite early on that an Iranian attack was imminent. Israel’s defense systems needed only to be prepared.

At approximately 10 p.m. on Saturday night, N and his fellow pilots were alerted that it was time to take to the skies.

 Israel Air Force jet after intercepting Iranian drones and missiles. April 14, 2024. (credit: IDF SPOKESPERSON'S UNIT)
Israel Air Force jet after intercepting Iranian drones and missiles. April 14, 2024
 
 

“I’ve been a pilot for over 20 years, and I have participated in many operations, both in and out of Israel. This was the most meaningful flight [yet],” he said. “Since October 7, we, like all of the air force, moved to the highest alertness level, whether it be relating to Gaza or further threats.”

That night, Israel deployed Eitam, Shavit, and Oron aircraft to detect, report, and ultimately help remove airborne threats.

Eitams are Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS) surveillance planes outfitted with more than $100 million worth of radar and command-and-control systems.

Shavits are intelligence-gathering planes with high altitudes, long flight ranges, and advanced system capabilities. They can detect the operation of electronic systems hundreds of kilometers away and in remote areas.

Orons are high-performance, low-maintenance aircraft equipped with advanced radar and intelligence systems that create real-time, comprehensive intelligence images. This was the type of aircraft N flew on Saturday night.

“We worked to recognize the threats and let the [Operations Division] and the fighter pilots know what the biggest threats were,” N explained. “The controllers in the back speak with the fighter pilots.

'It was like a computer game'

“We were in a very strategic location in the middle of the sky. We were the first to recognize and see what was coming. It was like a computer game.

 Israel Air Force jet after intercepting Iranian drones and missiles. April 14, 2024. (credit: IDF SPOKESPERSON'S UNIT)
Israel Air Force jet after intercepting Iranian drones and missiles. April 14, 2024. 
 

“I told them, ‘This target is on its way. We need to down this,’” he continued. “You suddenly realize, ‘My god, what am I doing? I cannot mess this up.’ Luckily, our team of controllers are such professionals. We passed messages on to them. It was excellent cooperation.”

According to him, without the work his squadron did, “some of the threats would have reached Israel, God forbid.”

Indeed, IDF Spokesperson R.-Adm. Daniel Hagari revealed, following the operation, that 99% of the aerial threats were shot down, and none of the 200 drones and 30 cruise missiles dispatched got through to Israeli territory at all.

The intel gathered by N and his teammates was ultimately the information that allowed aircraft, David’s Sling, or the Arrow missile systems to down the looming airborne threats. The Iron Dome, which defends well against Hamas and Hezbollah’s simple rockets, is less relevant for drones and fancier long-range missiles.

N, when asked how he felt after the operation, said that he was not able to sleep for days after.

“Only now, three days later, do I understand what I experienced there,” he said. “I experienced what it was like to participate in something far bigger than myself. I needed to protect the country in the most pure place physically. I feel that this was very meaningful and that I physically safeguarded Israel from the 60 tons of weapons.”

After they all landed safely, the pilots and controllers, along with their commanders, met for a debriefing, as the Air Force does regularly.

“A truly honest debriefing is central to us,” N said. “We are always looking to improve. We are ready for any threat. We are always practicing, always sharpening our knives.

“Not for a single moment do we forget the hostages,” N concluded tearfully. “Our main goal is to return them. I wish only for freedom for our hostages, that they return healthy and well, and that all the soldiers, reservists or not, come back home, amen.”

Squadron 122 was, as N described it, an “irreplaceable and crucial part of this operation.”

https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/defense-news/article-797337?

Tuesday, April 16, 2024

When A Moral Society Collapses You Get O.J. Museums & Donald Trump! *The white Ford Bronco that O.J. Simpson fled in is one of the most popular exhibits at the museum*

 


The O.J. Simpson White Bronco Is Now a Museum Piece. In Tennessee.

 

The vehicle that Simpson fled in as 95 million Americans watched on television is on display at the Alcatraz East Crime Museum in Pigeon Forge, Tenn.

 

 

A white Ford Bronco in a museum, next to an old-fashioned 1930s style car.
The white Ford Bronco that O.J. Simpson fled in is one of the most popular exhibits at the museum.


Tyler Starrett was on vacation with his family in Pigeon Forge, about 35 miles from Knoxville in eastern Tennessee, when they learned on Thursday that O.J. Simpson had died.

So they changed plans. They had heard that one of the key artifacts of the Simpson case happened to be on display nearby at the Alcatraz East Crime Museum: the 1993 white Ford Bronco that Simpson fled from the police in, just days after the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson, his former wife, and Ronald L. Goldman. They could not resist.

“If the Bronco is here in Pigeon Forge, why don’t we go see it?” Starrett, 23, said.

Starrett is too young to have been among the 95 million television viewers who watched the low-speed chase unfold on June 17, 1994, when a swarm of police cars followed the white Bronco over some 60 miles of Southern California freeways, with Simpson holding a gun to his head in the back seat. But he was among those who visited the museum to see the vehicle in person on Thursday, as a three-minute clip of the police chase played on loop in the background.

Pigeon Forge, best known for Dollywood, Dolly Parton’s theme park, is at first glance not an obvious home for such a relic. But in recent years, this town has increasingly become a place for attractions and museums dedicated to the offbeat and believe-it-or-not interests of an American tourist — including the Alcatraz East Crime Museum, which is housed in a prisonlike building designed to be a cross between the Tennessee State Prison just outside Nashville and the original Alcatraz, in San Francisco Bay.

Inside the museum, the white Bronco is one of several notorious vehicles.

It sits alongside the 1968 Volkswagen Beetle that was owned by the serial killer Ted Bundy, the 1933 Essex-Terraplane used by the bank robber John Dillinger and the so-called death car from the 1967 movie “Bonnie and Clyde,” riddled with bullet holes. (A Pigeon Forge snow globe featuring the museum, the Bronco and the Beetle can be purchased for $10.99 in the gift shop.)

“There are events in history that will always stick in people’s minds, and I think the O.J. chase is one of those for a large number of people,” said Ally Pennington, the artifacts and projects manager for the museum.

The chase, captured by news helicopters and broadcast live on television, gripped the nation. Networks interrupted Game 5 of the N.B.A. finals and prime-time shows, and brought star news anchors back to their newsrooms to narrate the scene.

 

A white Bronco on a freeway chased by more than a dozen patrol cars.
A swarm of police cars slowly chased the Bronco, which was traveling about 40 miles per hour.

Simpson, a former football star, eventually surrendered at his Los Angeles home. He was later acquitted of both sets of murder charges after an equally high-profile criminal trial, but was found liable for their deaths in a civil suit several years later.

The Bronco is among the most popular and most prominent exhibits at the privately owned museum, which opened in 2016 after a similar crime museum closed in Washington. The vehicle belonged to Al Cowlings, Simpson’s friend and former teammate, who was driving it about 40 miles per hour as Simpson fled the police.

The car was previously featured on a 2017 episode of the reality television show “Pawn Stars,” on which Mike Gilbert, a former agent for Simpson, said he purchased the car in part to keep it from potentially being used by a tour company. He unsuccessfully sought more than $1 million for it on the show.

The museum declined to say who allowed for the display of the car, citing privacy concerns.

“Different generations have different responses to it, because obviously people who watched the chase live and who were around for that respond differently,” Pennington said. She added, “Most people are just shocked to see it because it is the white Bronco from the O.J. chase and it’s such an iconic moment in history.”

Never far from the museum’s mind, Pennington said, are the victims of the crimes featured in the exhibits, or the pain experienced by those who survive them. She said that while Simpson’s death might change aspects of a temporary display recognizing the 30th anniversary of the tragedy, it planned to focus on the victims.

On Thursday, the museum had taped a label acknowledging Simpson’s death on a plexiglass case next to the Bronco that displays a set of his golf clubs. At least two visitors learned of his death from the sign.

“It was pretty wild — you’d have people arguing about it, you know, at Waffle House,” David Hardigree, who was visiting from Northern Kentucky, recalled of the Simpson trial, and the debates over whether he was guilty or not.

But his visit on Thursday, he said, was just “ironic timing.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/12/arts/television/oj-simpson-white-bronco-museum.html