EVERY SIGNATURE MATTERS - THIS BILL MUST PASS!

EVERY SIGNATURE MATTERS - THIS BILL MUST PASS!
CLICK - GOAL - 100,000 NEW SIGNATURES! 75,000 SIGNATURES HAVE ALREADY BEEN SUBMITTED TO GOVERNOR CUOMO!

EFF Urges Court to Block Dragnet Subpoenas Targeting Online Commenters

EFF Urges Court to Block Dragnet Subpoenas Targeting Online Commenters
CLICK! For the full motion to quash: http://www.eff.org/files/filenode/hersh_v_cohen/UOJ-motiontoquashmemo.pdf

Sunday, October 19, 2014

The Sociopaths Embedded in the Rabbinate - An Ongoing Pandemic!

WATCH VIDEO OF FREUNDEL IN COURT:
http://www.wjla.com/articles/2014/10/evidence-detailed-in-court-against-d-c-rabbi-accused-of-filming-women-undressing-at-synagogue-108200.html

Barry Freundel

 Witness: Freundel Innovated “Practice Dunking” To Record Candidates for Conversion


by Steven I. Weiss

Arrested Rabbi Created Unique Requirements for Female Converts
Part 2 of an investigative series by The Jewish Channel.

The rabbi arrested Tuesday on charges of voyeurism was recording women in the ritual bath of his synagogue going back to at least 2012, according to a woman who spoke with law enforcement Wednesday — in a practice that appears to be widespread and particularly focused on candidates for conversion. In a multi-part investigation conducted over more than a year by The Jewish Channel, at least six women told TJC of the process they underwent for conversion training with Rabbi Barry Freundel, pointing to several anomalies in his training methods — including an effort to get them alone in the ritual bath prior to conversion, in a practice they referred to as “practice dunking.”

Until last year the highest-ranking rabbi in the country on the question of who can be considered an Orthodox Jew in America, Freundel maintained a set of practices with converts that sources alternately described as “creepy,” “weird,” “inappropriate,” and, in the words of one rabbi, “treating his candidates for conversion like personal servants” and “an enormous ethical violation” in the words of another. One convert accused Freundel of an attempt at “extortion.”

Freundel was arrested Tuesday morning at his home in Georgetown. Instantly becoming national news, Freundel has been the pulpit rabbi at Kesher Israel, known as the synagogue where prominent D.C. players like Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew, The New Republic’s Leon Wieseltier, and former Senator Joseph Lieberman would attend services.

But Freundel also has played a much larger role in the global Jewish community. Freundel for years chaired the conversion committee of the largest body of Orthodox rabbis in the country, the Rabbinical Council of America (RCA), where he also designed and oversaw the RCA’s system of 13 regional rabbinical courts for conversion, and was the RCA’s point-person for negotiations with the Israeli Chief Rabbinate toward implementing universal standards for Orthodox Jewish conversion in 2006.

 In these positions, Freundel maintained what many rabbis described as “great power” over both the conversion process broadly, and many thousands of individual converts and candidates for conversion specifically.

Part 1 of this investigation, published as a partnership among The Jewish Channel and The Daily Beast, revealed documents that show violations of marital fidelity and kosher laws by Freundel. Part 2 will discuss Freundel’s innovation of “practice dunking” for conversion candidates. Subsequent installments in the series will explore other aspects of Freundel’s conduct, especially as related to congregants.

Among the unusual aspects of Freundel’s conversion routine was his request that many candidates do a “practice dunk” in the ritual bath, or mikvah. Several women told TJC they had worried that this was an episode of sexual exploitation — but only realized in retrospect what was likely to have occurred after Freundel’s Tuesday arrest for voyeurism.

In a typical conversion, a woman enters the ritual bath nude as a process of spiritual cleansing, a process familiar to many Orthodox women who do the same thing every month. A conversion bathing differs in that three rabbis observe the “dunking.” But while a typical conversion maintains a woman’s modesty by keeping the woman outside the rabbis’ field of vision while she enters the ritual bath, with the rabbis typically only seeing the top of the woman’s head, Freundel’s added practice dunks modified this process.

On at least six occasions discussed first-hand with The Jewish Channel and The Daily Beast, Freundel demanded that the women take an earlier, “practice” dunk in the mikvah, without any rabbis present. It’s a situation that left at least two women who would not be named feeling “confused,” and in one case “concerned,” but Freundel insisted that it was necessary.

Emma Shulevitz shared her story with detectives and prosecutors Wednesday morning after realizing that details of her practice dunking were relevant to the criminal investigation. While she was undergoing Freundel’s conversion training in October of 2012, Shulevitz told TJC in a phone call, “Freundel had called me the night before, this was after five months of being in the conversion process with him…he called to say, ‘can you do a practice dunk in the mikvah tomorrow.” Shulevitz described the process that followed, in which when she actually undressed and entered the ritual bath, Freundel “waited in the waiting rooms,” where she thought he could not see her. But prior to that time, while she was dressed, “he went into the bathroom with me.” In the bathroom, Shulevitz saw an alarm clock and “I thought it was a little bit weird to have an alarm clock in the mikvah.” It has been widely reported that law enforcement alleges Freundel used a special alarm clock with a hidden camera to capture images of nude women preparing to enter the ritual bath.



“I put my water bottle for drinking on the counter in front of that clock, and he said, ‘oh, don’t do that, don’t put that on the counter,” Shulevitz said. Having never been to a mikvah before, Shulevitz didn’t know if Freundel’s requests were regular practice. Since then, however, “I’ve been to other mikvahs and no one tells you what you can put where.”

At least five other women have told The Jewish Channel that they were similarly asked to do a practice dunk in the years between 2008 and 2012, and that they complied.

Bethany Mandel said she did a practice dunk while converting in 2011, and that “I know someone who was asked to do two, I know someone who was asked to do none.” Mandel said Freundel explained his reasoning for requiring the practice dunks, that he required them because of an experience with a prior convert, who in nervousness over the dunking process “stood up and turned around, and like full-frontal exposed herself to the rabbis…he wanted to do practice dunks so that people wouldn’t expose themselves on [ritual bath] day.” Two converts who requested anonymity for fear of having their conversions questioned said they had similar experiences. They said that they had little problem with it at the time, because the lack of any rabbi present meant they couldn’t understand how they could be exposed in a sexual manner. That attitude changed for some on Tuesday. “Now that I know there was a camera [in the ritual bath], looking back, I feel like there was something very strange about [Freundel's demand],” one convert said. Her conversion took place in 2012, too.

For Shulevitz, reading press reports about the alarm clock and embedded camera led her to seek out law enforcement to provide her testimony.

An RCA member rabbi who is an expert on conversion said that he had never heard of any rabbi requesting a candidate do practice dunks, and that “every conversion I’m familiar with” has simply involved that one ritual immersion at the end of the conversion process, when a female ritual bath attendant is typically present, and modesty is sought with three rabbis witnessing the process. The rabbi said “if you asked me, not in the context of Barry Freundel, if you asked me if that’s a good idea, I wouldn’t dismiss it completely,” and that he’d endorse any innovations in the conversion process “that could attenuate the nervousness [of a conversion candidate], I would do it.” However, “obviously in context of [Freundel's arrest]” the rabbi said, he’d perhaps evaluate the practice-dunking ritual differently, stressing that he did not yet have enough knowledge of Freundel’s arrest to pass judgment.

Tuesday, October 14, 2014

Police arrest Georgetown rabbi on voyeurism charge



A prominent modern Orthodox rabbi at a Georgetown synagogue was arrested by D.C. police on Tuesday morning and charged with voyeurism, according to a department spokeswoman.
Barry Freundel, 62, of the Kesher Israel Congregation in Georgetown, was being held in police custody Tuesday and would likely have an initial appearance in D.C. Superior Court on Wednesday. Police confirmed that his arrest came during a search of his home on O Street NW, about five blocks from the synagogue.
The police spokeswoman, Gwendolyn Crump, confirmed the arrest but declined to provide details of the allegation. Freundel’s home phone was not answered Tuesday afternoon. His arrest was first reported by Washingtonian magazine.
Freundel is one of the region’s most respected rabbis and leader of Kesher Israel, which belongs to the modern Orthodox school, a branch of Judaism that emphasizes Jewish law and tradition while trying to accommodate modern trends such as the rise of women in leadership. Kesher’s board is led by a woman.
He has taught at Baltimore Hebrew University, the University of Maryland and Georgetown University School of Law and has served as a consultant to the National Institutes of Health on ethical issues. According to Kesher’s Web site, he also heads the conversion committee of the Rabbinical Council of America and is vice president of the region’s Vaad, which oversees kosher rules at Jewish institutions.
Freundel has been rabbi at Kesher Israel since 1987.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voyeurism

"Nobody is going to seek help for pedophilia until they get caught. And getting caught involves committing a crime. And committing a crime against a child who will never be ‘right’ again...”







Discussion of Pedophilia Turns Heated


In an Op-Ed essay last Monday, Margo Kaplan set out to correct what she said were misconceptions about pedophilia, writing that pedophiles aren’t all child molesters and that an attraction to children is not itself a crime, but rather a mental illness.The article caused a stir, attracting over 1,200 reader comments.

 Many of these responses were rejected by our moderation staff, particularly for vicious attacks against both the author and commenters who expressed some measure of sympathy for pedophiles. In our moderation, we tried to create a space where readers would feel safe to freely discuss their views on this contentious subject.“I anticipated strong responses, so that was no surprise,” said Ms. Kaplan, who teaches law at Rutgers University. “People commonly confuse pedophilia with child sexual abuse. 

So if you even mention something that sounds empathetic to the mental disorder of pedophilia, people might incorrectly think you are excusing child sexual abuse.”She also noted the feelings of rage, disgust and discomfort that surround discussions about the disorder. “It combines our discomfort with mental disorders and our disgust with sexual deviance — it really hits the jackpot of social animosity,” she said.When comments were closed on Tuesday afternoon, 993 of the 1,237 comments submitted were published.Reader reaction to the Op-Ed essay was mostly negative, but a wide range of views was expressed.

 Ms. Kaplan said that was also the case in her email inbox, which, unlike the Times moderation platform, does not have a profanity filter.“But, along with a lot of hostility, I have heard from individuals who were very supportive, one or two of whom had either personally struggled or had family members or close friends who struggled with pedophilic disorder,” she said. “They had lived with this secret and felt they had nowhere to turn for treatment or help.”Among those applauding Ms. Kaplan’s call for increased civil rights for pedophiles was Resident Alien from D.C., who believes “witch trials” against pedophiles destroy the lives of many people who aren’t criminals.

 “Paedophiles who restrain themselves, do not commit any illegitimate act and are determined never do anything (beyond smiling or patting a child on the head) are not criminals and are not a threat,” he said.Whether or not civil rights should be expanded for pedophiles remained a point of contention. 

“Nonsense,” hey nineteen in Chicagowrote. “An adult who feels sexual attraction to prepubescent children is indistinguishable from an adult who does not feel this attraction, right up until s/he acts on her/his sexual attraction.

In the article, Ms. Kaplan argued that pedophiles shouldn’t lose a job, or be denied a job if they are seeking treatment. However, Josh Hill argued, “Once you give pedophiles legal protection as handicapped individuals, it will become too difficult to keep them from jobs in which they might come into contact with children.”A reader called Dalgliesh echoed a common theme in the comments, writing: “When a pedophile’s treatment inevitably fails, how do you treat the victim? Somehow, I seem to care a lot more about the children than their adult predators. But, hey, maybe that’s just me.”For others, the article stirred painful memories.

 Jay in New York City said he was sexually abused for 14 years starting at age 3. At 59, he suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder along with chronic illnesses he associates with his abuse. “If anyone should be angry and judgmental toward pedophiles it is someone like myself,” he said. “Pedophilia destroys the life of the pedophile, as well as their victims. Let’s get these people treatment, and try to spare BOTH.”Even so, the notion that pedophiles suffer from a mental illness felt to many like an excuse for their behavior. “Is it possible society has tipped too far in our acceptance of mental illness?” asked eswope, a psychologist in Hawaii.

In the end, many readers were doubtful that treating pedophiles as mentally ill would prevent any crime. “Nobody is going to seek help for pedophilia until they get caught. And getting caught involves committing a crime. And committing a crime against a child who will never be ‘right’ again,” wrote Dorothy in Massachusetts.

READ MORE:
http://www.nytimes.com/times-insider/2014/10/13/discussion-of-pedophilia-turns-heated/?_php=true&_type=blogs&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=c-column-top-span-region&region=c-column-top-span-region&WT.nav=c-column-top-span-region&_r=0

Monday, October 13, 2014

“You look around and most of the deaths in the world are from contagious diseases. Not ISIS.”



Last month The Hollywood Reporter published an illuminating investigation on immunization trends in Los Angeles County, which revealed that vaccination rates on the city’s wealthy west side, in neighborhoods like Beverly Hills and Santa Monica, had plummeted, as incidents of whooping cough surged. The piece had the virtue of offering New Yorkers yet another opportunity to feel smugly superior to their counterparts in L.A., because of course here on the East Coast we like our science to come from scientists, not from former Playboy models and people who feel entitled to pontificate about public health because they drink kefir.


“I thought, Whooping cough? Who gets whooping cough anymore?” she said. The episode compelled her to start asking about vaccination early on. “No application to any school asks, ‘Are you an anti-vaxxer?’ but these schools want to keep the anti-vaxxers out.” So, she said, “I ask people and if they get into the whole anti-vaxxer deal, I say, ‘Fine, we can’t work with you.’ ” You’re not, as she put it, “going to Horace Mann like this.”

There is enough appeal in anti-vaccination thinking among members of the affluent class that certain pediatricians in the city, as they have elsewhere around the country, have made it a policy in recent years to refuse to see children whose parents won’t have them immunized. A few years ago Pediatric Associates of NYC, which has branches in Murray Hill in Manhattan and Prospect Heights in Brooklyn, chose this course, David Horwitz, a partner in the practice told me, in large part because it simply became untenable to have unvaccinated children sitting in waiting rooms.

Within the American Academy of Pediatrics there has been a rancorous debate about whether doctors should see un-immunized patients, and the academy’s position has leaned toward an inclusive approach. But, Dr. Horwitz said, “we were spending a lot of time talking to parents who weren’t immunizing and who were terribly ill informed. A lot of people would continue to come back and come back and come back and we were spending so much time talking about vaccinations that we weren’t dealing with other things,” he said.“We ultimately felt ethically uncomfortable seeing people who don’t vaccinate.

 We are advocates for children, not their parents.”

READ ENTIRE ARTICLE:


***MUST WATCH VIDEO - EBOLA***

Sunday, October 12, 2014

NY Times Comes to the Defense of…Pedophilia?

They told us we were using what’s known as the slippery slope fallacy and they mocked us mercilessly for it. You dumb conservatives don’t even know how to use logic! You claim that legalizing gay marriage will lead to all this other stuff, but it’s pure hogwash! Well, now the chickens have come home to roost. Polygamy was just decriminalized in Utah, one of the first predictions to come true following the debate over gay marriage. Now, if this editorial from the New York Times is any indication, pedophilia could be the next big issue on the liberal social agenda.
You can always count on the liberal media to humanize the most dastardly predilections enjoyed by the freaks of the world. To start generating sympathy for pedophiles everywhere, the paper wants you to think back to your first childhood crush. Pedophiles are just like you, the argument goes. They just never grew out of that first crush. They developed some kind of mental illness that persists through adulthood. That’s all. We need to help these people, not condemn them.
Oh boy. If it seems unlikely that many would buy into this line of reasoning, you may be in for a nasty surprise. When you have a country ungoverned by any moral authority other than “what seems right at the time,” you open the door to any number of possibilities. If you don’t think that the same people who put a woman’s convenience above a child’s right to life will also put a pedophile’s rights above those of children, you’ve got another think coming. Liberals thrive on standing up for the tiniest minorities they can fine. And they are proficient at introducing gray areas into matters that were black and white only a few years ago.

The vile op-ed goes on to explain that pedophilia is not a choice, but rather it is as inbred into a person’s DNA as schizophrenia, left-handedness, or, of course, homosexuality. It’s so obvious what they’ve done here that conservatives everywhere should be ashamed. Once the left won the battle over the origins of homosexuality, it gave them free reign to drag that same argument over into the arena of pedophilia. Now, what do we do? Agree that homosexuality is inborn but pedophilia is a choice? Where do you draw the line?

The truth is that it doesn’t really matter whether being attracted to children is a choice or not. Being a sociopath isn’t a choice, either, but that doesn’t mean they get a pass on murder. The same is true of pedophilia. If it’s simply some disease of the mind, that’s fine. That’s actually really unfortunate for those who have it. But are we going to stand by and watch while leftist lawmakers bend the law to accommodate this mental illness?
According to the author of this op-ed, we need to examine discrimination laws and change them to ensure that pedophiles don’t become victims of the system. Maybe. Maybe we should also change them to allow businesses to discriminate against hiring liberals. Clearly, their brand of insanity makes them dangerous to children, Christians, and the future of America.

- See more at: http://unfilteredpatriot.com/ny-times-comes-to-the-defense-of-pedophilia/#sthash.f7MLb1jc.dpuf

Wednesday, October 08, 2014

To the Ignoramuses of all Stripes on the Planet....


Growing Up Unvaccinated

I had the healthiest childhood imaginable. And yet I was sick all the time.

Baby getting a vaccination
You can provide your child with a perfect diet, but if you don't do this, he or she will still be prone to old-fashioned illnesses.
Iam the ’70s child of a health nut. I wasn’t vaccinated. I was brought up on an incredibly healthy diet: no sugar till I was 1, breastfed for over a year, organic homegrown vegetables, raw milk, no MSG, no additives, no aspartame. My mother used homeopathy, aromatherapy, osteopathy; we took daily supplements of vitamin C, echinacea, cod liver oil.
I had an outdoor lifestyle; I grew up next to a farm in England’s Lake District, walked everywhere, did sports and danced twice a week, drank plenty of water. I wasn’t even allowed pop; even my fresh juice was watered down to protect my teeth, and I would’ve killed for white, shop-bought bread in my lunchbox once in a while and biscuits instead of fruit, like all the other kids.
We ate (organic local) meat maybe once or twice a week, and my mother and father cooked everything from scratch—I have yet to taste a Findus crispy pancake, and oven chips (“fries,” to Americans) were reserved for those nights when Mum and Dad had friends over and we got a “treat.”
As healthy as my lifestyle seemed, I contracted measles, mumps, rubella, a type of viral meningitis, scarlatina, whooping cough, yearly tonsillitis, and chickenpox. In my 20s I got precancerous HPV and spent six months of my life wondering how I was going to tell my two children under the age of 7 that Mummy might have cancer before it was safely removed.
So the anti-vaccine advocates’ fears of having the “natural immunity sterilized out of us” just doesn’t cut it for me. How could I, with my idyllic childhood and my amazing health food, get so freaking ill all the time?
My mother would have put most of my current “crunchy” friends to shame. She didn’t drink, she didn’t smoke, she didn’t do drugs, and we certainly weren’t allowed to watch whatever we wanted on telly or wear plastic shoes or any of that stuff. She lived alternative health. And you know what? I’m glad she gave us such a great diet. I’m glad that she cared about us in that way.
But it just didn’t stop me getting childhood illnesses.

My two vaccinated children, on the other hand, have rarely been ill, have had antibiotics maybe twice in their lives, if that. Not like their mum. I got many illnesses requiring treatment with antibiotics. I developed penicillin-resistant quinsy at age 21—you know, that old-fashioned disease that supposedly killed Queen Elizabeth I and that was almost wiped out through use of antibiotics.*
My kids have had no childhood illnesses other than chickenpox, which they both contracted while still breastfeeding. They, too, grew up on a healthy diet, homegrown organics, etc. I was not quite as strict as my mother, but they are both healthier than I have ever been.
I find myself wondering about the claim that complications from childhood illnesses are extremely rare but that “vaccine injuries” are rampant. If this is the case, I struggle to understand why I know far more people who have experienced complications from preventable childhood illnesses than I have ever met with complications from vaccines. I have friends who became deaf from measles. I have a partially sighted friend who contracted rubella in the womb. My ex got pneumonia from chickenpox. A friend’s brother died from meningitis.
Anecdotal evidence is nothing to base decisions on. But when facts and evidence-based science aren’t good enough to sway someone’s opinion about vaccinations, then this is where I come from. After all, anecdotes are the anti-vaccine supporters’ way: “This is my personal experience.” Well, my personal experience prompts me to vaccinate my children and myself. I got the flu vaccine recently, and I got the whooping cough booster to protect my son in the womb. My natural immunity—from having whooping cough at age 5—would not have protected him once he was born.
I understand, to a point, where the anti-vaccine parents are coming from. Back in the ’90s, when I was a concerned, 19-year-old mother, frightened by the world I was bringing my child into, I was studying homeopathy, herbalism, and aromatherapy; I believed in angels, witchcraft, clairvoyants, crop circles, aliens at Nazca, giant ginger mariners spreading their knowledge to the Aztecs, the Incas, and the Egyptians, and that I was somehow personally blessed by the Holy Spirit with healing abilities. I was having my aura read at a hefty price and filtering the fluoride out of my water. I was choosing to have past life regressions instead of taking antidepressants. I was taking my daily advice from tarot cards. I grew all my own veg and made my own herbal remedies.
I was so freaking crunchy that I literally crumbled. It was only when I took control of those paranoid thoughts and fears about the world around me and became an objective critical thinker that I got well. It was when I stopped taking sugar pills for everything and started seeing medical professionals that I began to thrive physically and mentally.
If you think your child’s immune system is strong enough to fight off vaccine-preventable diseases, then it’s strong enough to fight off the tiny amounts of dead or weakened pathogens present in any of the vaccines.
But not everyone around you is that strong, not everyone has a choice, not everyone can fight those illnesses, and not everyone can be vaccinated. If you have a healthy child, then your healthy child can cope with vaccines and can care about those unhealthy children who can’t.
I would ask the anti-vaxxers to treat their children with compassion and a sense of responsibility for those around them. I would ask them not to teach their children to be self-serving and scared of the world in which they live and the people around them. (And teach them to love people with autism spectrum disorder or any other disability supposedly associated with vaccines—not to label them as damaged.)
Most importantly, I want the anti-vaxxers to see that knowingly exposing your child to illness is cruel. Even without complications, these diseases aren’t exactly pleasant. I don’t know about you, but I don’t enjoy watching children suffer even with a cold or a hurt knee. If you’ve never had these illnesses, you don’t know how awful they are. I do. Pain, discomfort, the inability to breathe or to eat or to swallow, fever and nightmares, itching all over your body so much that you can’t stand lying on bedsheets, losing so much weight you can’t walk properly, diarrhea that leaves you lying prostrate on the bathroom floor, the unpaid time off work for parents, the quarantine, missing school, missing parties, the worry, the sleepless nights, the sweat, the tears, the blood, the midnight visits to the emergency room, the time sitting in a doctor’s waiting room on your own because no one will sit near you because they’re rightfully scared of those spots all over your face.


Those of you who have avoided childhood illnesses without vaccines are lucky. You couldn’t do it without us pro-vaxxers. Once the vaccination rates begin dropping, the drop in herd immunity will leave your children unprotected. The more people you convert to your anti-vax stance, the quicker that luck will run out.
This piece originally appeared on Voices for Vaccines.

 This post has been updated to clarify that the quinsy the author contracted, not the author herself, was resistant to penicillin. (Return.)resistant to penicillin. (Return.)



Tuesday, October 07, 2014

"For 16 years your daughters were being raped and....."


Op-Ed: BBC Feasts on Israel, Silent on Rapes in Rotherham

If only the BBC had taken its eyes off Israel for a moment...


The BBC has been so busy with Israel that it has had no time to protect its own daughters. This is the crux of journalistic malpractice.

Journalism’s main role is to keep us informed. When it departs from that duty, there is chaos. Rotherham, for example.

That’s where more than 1,400 English girls were repeatedly raped over a period of 16 years. The girls were mostly Christian and white. The rapists were mostly Pakistanis living in or around the same northern England town, population 250,000, and since these crimes were committed by Muslims, or “Asian men” – hence, your cover-up.

Polite Society can’t handle the truth.

I learned about all this not from The New York Times (of course not), but it was Rich Lowry in the New York Post who opened my eyes.

I share this one paragraph as follows:

“An independent report released last week says, ‘It is hard to describe the appalling nature of the abuse that child victims suffered. They were raped by multiple perpetrators, trafficked to other towns and cities in the north of England, abducted, beaten and intimidated.’”


So it is when Sharia comes to town.
So the story is coming to light just now. Local authorities were afraid to rock the boat. They chose to ignore the scandal in their midst for fear of being termed bigots. So the raping continued. A woman who finally cried foul was denounced for being Islamophobic. She was sent to sensitivity school.

We are now learning that “UK police arrested parents trying to stop Muslims from raping their children.” So it is when Sharia comes to town.
The men and women who run Rotherham are finally being asked to answer for their sin of neglect. There is finger pointing. 

These happen to be small-timers, small-time burghers and politicians who can easily be intimidated and corrupted.

But where was prime time? Where was the BBC? During all that time – 16 years! --where was Orla Guerin and the rest of the BBC’s army of resolute reporters? We know this. They weren’t in Rotherham. If they’d been in Rotherham perhaps 100 rapes could have been stopped. Perhaps 10? Or perhaps only one, and even that would have been enough to claim a slice of triumph in the name of journalism.
Instead, Orla Guerin and the rest of the BBC were in Israel. They rotated one staffer after another to cover every inch of the Gaza war. They wept for the “innocent civilians” of Gaza, virtually all of whom, according to recent surveys, support Hamas and favor continued terror and warfare. So much for innocence.

Have there been tears for the girls of Rotherham? If so, occasional viewers like me haven’t noticed. We have, however, noticed that the BBCcan be spot on against every move within the Land of Israel, 1,000 miles away, but can’t find a map for Rotherham, 10 miles away. (Relative figures.)

If a Jewish family in Jerusalem desires to extend its backyard by two feet, the entire world of journalism collapses upon the Jewish State. Swiftly theBBC gathers up its reporters and rushes to the scene with cameras zooming in upon every nuance of the dispute…indeed, every dispute.

If it involves Israel, the issue being however big or small, there you will find the BBC…if the NY Times doesn’t get there first.

No such luck for the girls of Rotherham.

I suggest as powerfully as I can, that this overindulgence, this gluttonous feasting upon Israel, is wholly or partly responsible for the crimes of Rotherham. Pure and honest and bold investigative reporting could have stopped the outrage. If only the BBC had taken its eyes off Israel for a moment.

This obsession against Israel is a sickness afflicting the entire media and the cost is astonishing for all that is not being reported elsewhere.

Humanity…civilized society, pays for these crimes of journalistic neglect. Rotherham is a fact but it is also a symptom.

Instead of 10 crews to cover EVERYTHING about Israel, how about sparing one crew of reporters to cover ANYTHING in your own neighborhoods, BBC.

That could have made a difference between life and death in Rotherham.

Or perhaps Orla Guerin could have shed one tear less for Gaza and one tear more for her own English sisters.

Change Pakistanis to Israelis and see how quickly Miss Guerin would pounce on the story.

This is not to say that the BBC stands alone in the docket. The Guardian and the rest of England’s editors and reporters – where we you? For 16 years your daughters were being raped and, for the sake of diversity, you were mute, and even today you hardly have the courage to name the criminals Pakistani Muslims.

Shame on you.

Jack Engelhard writes a regular column for Arutz Sheva. NEW …”The Bathsheba Deadline,” now on Kindle, soon in paperback, the “heroic” and “rousing thriller” they tried to ban for exposing media bias against Israel, written by Novelist Engelhard who viewed all the corruption and obsession against Israel from inside-the-newsroom. The novel saw it all coming ahead of time, Hamas, ISIS. Everything. Engelhard’s most famous work is the int’l bestseller “Indecent Proposal” that was translated into more than 22 languages and turned into a Paramount motion picture starring Robert Redford and Demi Moore.  Website: www.jackengelhard.com