EVERY SIGNATURE MATTERS - THIS BILL MUST PASS!

EVERY SIGNATURE MATTERS - THIS BILL MUST PASS!
CLICK - GOAL - 100,000 NEW SIGNATURES! 75,000 SIGNATURES HAVE ALREADY BEEN SUBMITTED TO GOVERNOR CUOMO!

CLICK!

Tuesday, May 23, 2017

History Repeating Itself - Arming The Terrorists!

 


"....What was missing was any hint of a rebuke to the Saudi theocracy for its toxic behavior. By every measure, Saudi Arabia is among the most despotic countries on earth. Freedom House, the venerable human-rights watchdog, has for years given Saudi Arabia its worst possible rating. The government “restricts almost all political rights and civil liberties through a combination of oppressive laws and the use of force,” Freedom House notes in its 2017 report.
 

Political parties are forbidden, and organized political opposition exists only outside the country. Political dissent is criminalized. Activists who challenge the kingdom’s record on political inclusion or call for constitutional changes are treated harshly. . .

Islam is the official religion, and all Saudis are required by law to be Muslims. A 2014 royal decree punishes atheism with up to 20 years in prison. The government prohibits the public practice of any religion other than Islam. . . .

Women are not treated as equal members of society, and many laws discriminate against them. They are not permitted to drive cars . . . and must obtain permission from a male guardian in order to travel within or outside of the country. . . .

The religious police enforce a strict policy of gender segregation and often harass women, using physical punishment to ensure compliance with conservative standards of dress in public.

But there was no suggestion in Trump’s address that Saudi Arabia’s brutal repression is of particular concern to the United States. Nor was there any mention of the fact that Saudi money is deployed worldwide to promote Wahhabism, the fundamentalist strain of Islam that fuels extremist intolerance. (It wasn't so long ago that Trump himself called Saudi Arabia "the world's biggest funder of terrorism.)

Rather than allude to any of that, the president flattered his hosts. He praised their “encouraging statement of tolerance, respect, empowering women, and economic development.” He assured them that he had not come “to lecture [or] to tell other people how to live.” The words “freedom,” “liberty,” and “democracy” didn’t cross his lips. He said nothing of the kingdom’s prisoners of conscience, scores of whom are publicly whipped or beheaded each year.

Trump might have put his bully pulpit to better use. He could have urged clemency for Raif Badawi, the pro-democracy blogger who was sentenced to 1,000 lashes and 10 years in prison for the crime of defending free speech and pluralism on his website, the Saudi Free Liberals Forum. Badawi’s cause has been championed by 18 Nobel laureates, by Amnesty International, by a bipartisan group of U.S. senators. But not by President Trump.

At most, Trump’s remarks in Riyadh — carefully read off a Teleprompter, with few ad libs — were a wash. He was clear on the menace of radical Islam, which was to the good. But he was equally clear about his unwillingness to deploy American power, even the power of American ideals, to crush that menace....."


 Via Jeff Jacoby ---The Boston Globe


US–Saudi Arabia AWACS Sale

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The sale of AWACS (Airborne Warning and Control System) surveillance planes to Saudi Arabia by the United States administration of President Ronald Reagan was a controversial part of what was then the largest foreign arms sale in US history. The sale saw objections from a majority of Americans, prominent US Senators, the State of Israel and the Israel lobby.[1]

The sale included the five E-3 Sentry AWACS aircraft and eight KE-3 refueling aircraft, with spare parts and support, delivered between June 1986 and September 1987.[2]

Contents

AWACS


USAF E-3 Sentry in flight

The United States Air Force began using the E-3 Airborne Warning and Control System aircraft in 1977 following ten years of prototype design, development, and testing.[3] The U.S. currently has a fleet of 32 E-3s, the largest in the world. NATO possesses 17, the United Kingdom has seven, Saudi Arabia has five, and France has four.[4]

The E-3 is a modified Boeing 707 commercial jetliner characterized by the strikingly large thirty-foot rotating antenna mounted on its roof. This antenna can detect and track other aircraft within an area of 175,000 square miles (450,000 km2), flying at any altitude or over any terrain, allowing the AWACS to detect aircraft that remain hidden from ground radar.[5] The planes' mobility is a crucial feature, providing for the use of this sophisticated detection equipment whenever and wherever needed; AWACS can be deployed quickly into military conflict "regardless of intensity" according to Boeing, who claims AWACS are the "world’s standard for airborne early warning systems."[6]

The Saudi AWACS bear Arabic writing on their exterior with a translation below, "Royal Saudi Air Force". The roof-mounted antenna is an AWACS plane’s dominant feature; it is a smooth black disk with a white stripe down the center, and it rotates constantly. The antenna is about a fifth of the length of the plane and it sits higher above the roof than the plane’s roof sits above the ground. Another noticeable difference from a commercial 707 is the lack of passenger windows. Colonel Walt Kowalik said about the lack of windows, "We don't want 'em ... we don't want our people looking out of windows. We want them concentrating on what's in front of them."[5] An Associated Press writer described blue carpet and "subdued" lighting, "as in a movie theatre."[5]
 

Reaction in the United States

Only months old, the Reagan Administration announced its plans to sell five of the U.S.-made AWACS to Saudi Arabia. The proposal, part of the largest foreign arms sale ever[7] was not received warmly on Capitol Hill where Congressional consent was required. The AWACS proposal was also harshly rejected by Israel and disapproved of by a majority of Americans. Upon formal introduction of the AWACS proposal to Congress in the fall of 1981, many Senators reacted coldly. "This is one of the worst and most dangerous arms sales ever," proclaimed Massachusetts Senator Edward Kennedy. Senator Donald Riegle said, "We are being asked to submit to a kind of blackmail; the price gouging of oil."[8] These Senators feared that the AWACS sale was not designed to promote stability, as would be claimed by the Administration, but to secure U.S. oil resources. Such a deal would mean technology for oil access, and as Kennedy said, a potentially dangerous deal at that. Senator Bob Packwood, who as a Republican was a member of Reagan’s party, was also a leader of opposition to the AWACS deal in the Senate. Packwood spelled out the danger he saw in arming Saudi Arabia:

"They have displayed a hostility that must be interpreted as their deliberate intentions to promote continued instability in the Middle East." Packwood questioned the choice of Saudi Arabia as an arbiter of peace saying, "Let’s think about which nations have been seriously committed to negotiating peace in the Middle East and which have not shared that commitment."[9] With the recently ended American hostage crisis in Iran fresh in mind, Americans were reluctant to sell military equipment to anyone. In fact, a May 1981 poll showed that 52% of those surveyed opposed arms sales to any country, and only 19% wanted the U.S. to sell AWACS to Saudi Arabia.[10]

Considering Israel

Israel, feeling its security directly threatened, was the most strongly opposed to the AWACS deal of anyone involved. Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin expressed "profound regret and unreserved opposition" to the Saudi AWACS proposal.[11] Experts on Israeli defense said that AWACS could track every move of the Israel’s air force, denying it the chance to launch a "surprise first strike, the basis of Israeli defense doctrine."[11] While Israel's "unreserved opposition" was based on the real security threat it faced, its "profound regret" could have been rooted in perceived betrayal by the United States. A protector of Israel since the Six-Day War, the U.S. was planning to sell military surveillance planes to Saudi Arabia, a country hostile towards Israel. A Boston Globe editorial from May 4, 1981 recognized this contradiction as well as other threats posed by the AWACS sale, noting, "the intention to sell AWACS planes to Saudi Arabia constitutes not only a manifest contradiction of Reagan's campaign promise to enhance Israel's security, but also serves to further destabilize the Mideast, a region whose stability was supposed to be a strategic priority of the Reagan foreign policy." The sensitivity of Congress to the threats against peace and stability, was matched by its sensitivity to Israel's concerns.

The Reagan Administration actively sought to diminish Israel's voice and influence over the deal. In public speeches, Administration officials admonished Israel for getting involved in a U.S. foreign policy matter. Secretary of State Alexander Haig said the President must be "free of the restraints of overriding external vetoes," and went on to say that were the AWACS deal blocked by Israeli influence, there would be "serious implications on all American policies in the Middle East. ... I'll just leave it there."[8] Reagan himself declared, "It is not the business of other nations to make American foreign policy."[12]

Winning support

In order to gain support for the AWACS deal in Congress and in the country, the Administration lobbied strongly on behalf of it. Though it continually stated the AWACS deal would benefit US "interests" in the Middle East, the Administration also gave promises of the AWACS planes' importance in securing peace. In a speech to Congress, Alexander Haig said that if the AWACS sale was blocked, "our security, the security of Israel and peace itself (might) be endangered,"[13] Reagan himself promoted the AWACS sale saying, "By contributing to the stability of the area, it improves Israeli security."[12] The Administration even commissioned former government officials to speak about AWACS as part of the peace cause. Richard Nixon's Secretary of State Henry Kissinger said "it is essential for the peace process in the Middle East."[14] Congress approved the AWACS sale, and as part of the then-largest arms export ever, the planes were a symbolic commitment to the US/Saudi relationship.

US arms sale to Saudi Arabia, 2010

 

On October 20, 2010, the US State Department notified Congress of its intention to make the biggest arms sale in American history—an estimated $60.5 billion purchase by Saudi Arabia, trumping the former US-Saudi AWACS sale. The package represents a considerable improvement in the offensive capability of the Saudi armed forces. Israel did not raise objections to the sale, except to say that it was "not thrilled about it." At the time, a senior administration official stressed: "This is a big development, because it's part of a larger regional strategy and the maintenance of a strong US presence in the region. We're paying attention to the needs of our allies and what everyone in the region believes is a flexing of muscles by a more aggressive Iran. One way to deal with that is to make our allies and friends strong."[15]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/US%E2%80%93Saudi_Arabia_AWACS_Sale

1 comment:

UOJ gets Results said...

http://www.marbitz.com/accountable/orthodox_crime.html

There are, to our great shame, Orthodox Jews who have committed serious financial (& other) crimes and the days when that could be hidden are now, thanks to the Internet, long gone. If we care about protecting our families & communities from corruption, we've got to respond with clarity & determination.

Unfortunately not everyone in the Orthodox world seems to understand it that way. A disturbing number of frum individuals & orgs assume that any outwardly religious Jew who is tried or convicted of a financial crime must somehow be perfectly innocent & the victim of a dishonest & antisemitic court, not to mention a deeply corrupt Federal Administration.

In advocating such versions of the events, one risks making heroes out of people who are unrepentant criminals. Worse, an entire generation of Jewish children will grow up convinced that the most benevolent government in the history of our exile lacks basic rule of law & whose judges are nothing more than puppets of dark interests. Think about the consequences: if the government is as crooked as some Jews would have us believe, then may we not conclude it is reasonable to "take back" what's "rightfully" ours (through tax evasion or welfare fraud)? Will that not further break down any psychological resistance to financial crime that still exists in the frum community?

In the 1970's, R' Shimon Schwab wrote an article (included in "Selected writings: C.I.S.) in response to criminal convictions of "frum" Jews engaged in white collar crimes:

Certainly we are not sitting in judgment of the persons who are publicly accused & we have to wait whether the indictments will be borne out by irrefutable evidence. However, the Chillul Hashem is there in the worst possible way. “Rabbi” so & so, who sits in court with his velvet Yarmulka in full view of a television audience of millions of viewers, is accused of having ruthlessly enriched himself at the expense of others, flaunting the laws of G-d & man, exploiting, conniving & manipulating - in short, desecrating all the fundamentals of Torah Judaism. And this sorry onslaught on our Jewish sensitiveness is repeated by similar allegations, proven or unproven, involving more prominent men who are stigmatized as orthodox Jews, sometimes even with so-called rabbinic diplomas.

...The Chillul Hashem of a few individuals provides excuses for the doubter & encourages the desecration of Torah learning, education & influence. To defraud & exploit our fellowmen, Jew or gentile, to conspire, to betray the Government, to associate with underworld elements all these are hideous crimes by themselves. Yet to the outrage committed there is added another dimension, namely the profanation of the Divine Name & that means the profanation of all that is to be held sacred by us as well as - in their heart of hearts - by the perpetrators themselves. What a sorry picture that is.
...Suppose I have cheated my neighborhood or my Government & then I stand in the midst of a congregation of honest & decent men & women to recite the Kaddish which is the prayer for Kiddush Hashem in the world. What audacity! What a shame! Can there be a worse contradiction than the strict Sabbath observer who may also be a stickler for Kashrus & who at the same time violates the spirit of Shabbos & Kashrus during the week with non-kosher money manipulations?

...Therefore, no white-washing, no condoning, no apologizing on behalf of the desecraters. Let us make it clear that anyone who besmirches the sacred Name ceases to be our friend. He has unwittingly defected from our ranks & has joined our antagonist, to make us all suffer in his wake. And - noblesse oblige - the more prominent a man has become in orthodox Jewish circles the more obligated he must feel to observe the most painstaking scrupulousness in his dealings with the outside world.