There is a familiar American pattern, and it is ugly in its predictability. Trump courts applause with swagger, toys with danger, cuts corners in the name of “strength,” and when the wreckage arrives, someone else is left holding the bag. In Donald Trump’s case, the bag is almost certainly going to be handed to Israel, to the Zionists, and, if history is any guide, to the Jews themselves. The deal may be sold as a triumph. The fallout will be sold as somebody else’s fault.
This is the central fraud of Trump’s Middle East posture: the theatrics are his, the slogans are his, the grandiose promises are his — but the blame is always transferable. He wants the credit for toughness without the discipline of statecraft, the glory of “peace” without the burden of outcomes.WHEN the Iran track collapses, if the Middle East erupts, if America is embarrassed, if allies are betrayed, he will not stand there and say, “I misread everything.” No. He will look for a scapegoat. And the oldest, easiest scapegoat in Western civilization is still available on the shelf.
That is what makes this moment so dangerous for Israel and for Jews everywhere. Not merely the possibility of a bad agreement with Iran, but the political architecture around failure. Trump does not operate like a statesman who accepts responsibility; he operates like a showman who survives by blame-shifting. The minute the “deal” starts unraveling — and these deals so often unravel — the story will not be “Trump was naïve.” The story will be “Israel meddled,” “the Zionists pushed too hard,” “the Jews wanted war,” “the lobby demanded too much,” “the allies ruined it.” The accusation does not need to be coherent. It only needs to be useful.
And that is the point. Trump does not need to hate Jews to be dangerous to Jews. He only needs to be reckless, vain, and desperate to preserve his own myth. History is full of leaders who, when cornered, discovered that blaming the Jews was the cheapest form of political insurance. Trump is not a thinker; he is an accumulator of resentments. He has spent years training a coalition to believe that every failure is somebody else’s sabotage. That is the raw material of antisemitic politics: not always explicit hatred, but the constant preparation of a scapegoat.
Israel should understand this better than anyone. There is no such thing as a bad deal that stays isolated. A weak agreement with Iran is not merely a diplomatic mistake; it is an invitation to future chaos. Tehran will pocket every concession it can, buy time, reposition itself, and wait for the next American president, or the next crisis, or the next moment of Western fatigue. And when that happens, the blame will not be assigned to the man who signed the paper with too much bravado and too little seriousness. It will be assigned to the people who were never invited to write the paper in the first place.
This is how the trap is set. First comes the overpromise. Then comes the compromise dressed up as victory. Then comes the predictable Iranian cheating, the regional escalation, the diplomatic humiliation. And finally comes the great American ritual of deflection: someone must have “undermined” the plan. Someone must have “pushed him too far.” Someone must have “made it impossible.” In Washington, that someone is often Israel. In the fever swamps, it is the Jews.
The tragedy is that Trump’s style invites exactly the sort of moral laziness that antisemitism feeds on. He reduces everything to transaction and vanity. He thinks alliances are loyalty tests, not strategic necessities. He treats adversaries as if they were reality-show contestants. He thinks the world is impressed by noise. But the Middle East does not care about noise. Iran does not fear bluster; it exploits it. And when the inevitable consequences arrive, the man who sold himself as the master negotiator will need a villain more than he needs the truth.
So yes, Israel and Jews should beware. Not because every criticism of Israel is antisemitic — it is not — but because in the Trump era, criticism can be weaponized, and bad outcomes can be converted into ethnic accusation with astonishing speed. A failed deal becomes an accusation. An Iranian provocation becomes a talking point. An Israeli objection becomes “sabotage.” And suddenly the ancient poison is back in circulation, wrapped in modern populist packaging.
The worst may not be the deal itself. The worst may be the aftermath: the blame, the resentment, the conspiracy, the ugly old story told in a new American accent. That is the danger Trump brings to the table. Not only bad policy, but a political culture in which Jews are made to pay for other people’s fantasies.
 |
| REPUBLISHED |
No comments:
Post a Comment